AIC quotes Flashcards

1
Q

The _ don’t want _

A

Germans , War

  • Speaker: Arthur Birling
  • Meaning: Birling’s arrogant dismissal of impending conflict, showcasing ruling-class ignorance.
  • Plot Lead-up: Birling’s speech about his confidence in capitalism and stability.
  • Relevance to Play: Establishes dramatic irony (WWI begins two years later), discrediting capitalist ideology.
  • Literary Devices: Dramatic irony (audience knows war is imminent), hubris.
  • Author’s Intent: Criticize the ruling class’s detachment from reality and foreshadow their moral failures.
  • Context: Pre-WWI complacency among industrialists; Priestley wrote post-WWII, highlighting capitalist shortsightedness.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

you’ll have to get _ to that _ as i had

A

used just

  • Speaker: Mrs. Birling
  • Meaning: Normalizes male infidelity as an inevitable part of patriarchal marriage.
  • Plot Lead-up: Sheila confronts Gerald about his affair.
  • Relevance to Play: Reinforces systemic oppression of women.
  • Literary Devices: Imperative tone, irony (Mrs. Birling perpetuates cycles of oppression).
  • Author’s Intent: Expose how patriarchy traps women into complicity.
  • Context: 1912 gender roles confined women to domesticity; Priestley advocates for equality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A man has to mind his own _

A

business

  • Speaker: Arthur Birling
  • Meaning: Justifies capitalist self-interest over social responsibility.
  • Plot Lead-up: Birling defends firing Eva Smith.
  • Relevance to Play: Summons the Inspector, symbolizing accountability.
  • Literary Devices: Irony (Birling’s “business” harms others), foreshadowing.
  • Author’s Intent: Condemn laissez-faire capitalism’s dehumanizing effects.
  • Context: Industrialists prioritized profit over worker welfare; Priestley promotes collective responsibility.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why sholdnt they try for higher_

A

wages

  • Speaker: Eric Birling
  • Meaning: Challenges capitalist exploitation of workers.
  • Plot Lead-up: Gerald justifies Eva’s sacking to preserve profits.
  • Relevance to Play: Delivers Priestley’s socialist message.
  • Literary Devices: Rhetorical question, didacticism.
  • Author’s Intent: Advocate for workers’ rights and fair pay.
  • Context: 1945 audience post-WWII Labour landslide; Priestley endorses socialist reforms.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

these young _ counting their _

A

women pennies

  • Speaker: Inspector Goole
  • Meaning: Highlights women’s economic precarity under capitalism.
  • Plot Lead-up: The Inspector condemns the Birlings’ treatment of Eva.
  • Relevance to Play: Links class and gender oppression.
  • Literary Devices: Symbolism (“pennies” = poverty), pathos.
  • Author’s Intent: Humanize working-class struggles and critique systemic inequality.
  • Context: 1912 women lacked financial independence; Priestley supports welfare reforms.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

you might be said to have been _ of her

A

jealous

  • Speaker: Inspector Goole (to Sheila)
  • Meaning: Reveals societal pressure on women to compete for male approval.
  • Plot Lead-up: Sheila’s role in Eva’s dismissal from Milwards.
  • Relevance to Play: Critiques patriarchal standards of female self-worth.
  • Literary Devices: Accusatory tone, psychological insight.
  • Author’s Intent: Expose how patriarchy pits women against each other.
  • Context: Women’s value tied to marriageability; Priestley condemns superficiality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

only escaped with a torn _

A

blouse

  • Speaker: Narrator (about Sheila’s friend)
  • Meaning: Men’s predatory behavior at the Palace Bar.
  • Plot Lead-up: Eva’s descent into prostitution.
  • Relevance to Play: Shows systemic sexual exploitation of women.
  • Literary Devices: Euphemism (“torn blouse” = assault), imagery.
  • Author’s Intent: Condemn normalized violence against women.
  • Context: Lack of legal protections for women; Priestley demands societal change.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

it happened to a friend of mine … had gone off to _

A

Canada

  • Speaker: Gerald Croft
  • Meaning: Gerald’s euphemistic justification for keeping Eva as a mistress.
  • Plot Lead-up: Gerald’s “rescue” of Eva from the Palace Bar.
  • Relevance to Play: Exposes upper-class exploitation of vulnerable women.
  • Literary Devices: Passive voice (downplays agency), euphemism.
  • Author’s Intent: Critique patriarchal entitlement and hypocrisy.
  • Context: Mistresses were socially tolerated but morally condemned; Priestley rejects double standards.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

girls of that _

A

class

  • Speaker: Sybil Birling
  • Meaning: Sybil’s contempt for working-class women.
  • Plot Lead-up: Sybil denies Eva charity, leading to her suicide.
  • Relevance to Play: Highlights class-based cruelty.
  • Literary Devices: Derogatory tone, dehumanization.
  • Author’s Intent: Expose ruling-class hypocrisy (charity vs. disdain).
  • Context: Victorian/Edwardian charity often paternalistic; Priestley advocates for structural equality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

i was in that state where a _ easily turns _

A

chap nasty

  • Speaker: Eric Birling
  • Meaning: Eric downplays his sexual assault of Eva.
  • Plot Lead-up: Eric’s confession about exploiting Eva.
  • Relevance to Play: Condemns toxic masculinity and entitlement.
  • Literary Devices: Euphemism (“that state” = drunkenness), generalization (“a chap”).
  • Author’s Intent: Show how patriarchy excuses male violence.
  • Context: Lack of accountability for sexual violence; Priestley demands justice.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Not really. I intended to _

A

pay it back

  • Speaker: Eric Birling
  • Meaning: Eric’s dishonest justification for stealing money.
  • Plot Lead-up: Eric’s theft of £50 from his father.
  • Relevance to Play: Exposes ruling-class corruption.
  • Literary Devices: Verbal irony (audience doubts his intent), self-deception.
  • Author’s Intent: Criticize capitalist greed and moral bankruptcy.
  • Context: Wealthy elites often evaded consequences; Priestley endorses accountability.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

millions and millions of _ smiths and _ smiths

A

Eva John

  • Speaker: Inspector Goole
  • Meaning: Eva symbolizes all exploited workers and women.
  • Plot Lead-up: Inspector’s final warning before leaving.
  • Relevance to Play: Universalizes the play’s socialist message.
  • Literary Devices: Symbolism (Eva = every worker), hyperbole.
  • Author’s Intent: Urge collective action against inequality.
  • Context: Post-war Labour movement; Priestley advocates for systemic reform.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

we are members of one _

A

body

  • Speaker: Inspector Goole
  • Meaning: Advocates socialist unity through Christian ethics.
  • Plot Lead-up: Inspector’s closing speech.
  • Relevance to Play: Core moral message of the play.
  • Literary Devices: Metaphor (“one body” = society), religious allusion.
  • Author’s Intent: Align socialism with Christian values to persuade audiences.
  • Context: 1945 Christian socialism influenced Labour policies; Priestley bridges faith and politics.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

_ and _ and anguish

A

fire blood

  • Speaker: Inspector Goole / Sheila
  • Meaning: Warns of consequences for ignoring social responsibility.
  • Plot Lead-up: Sheila repeats the Inspector’s warning after his exit.
  • Relevance to Play: Links capitalist exploitation to war and suffering.
  • Literary Devices: Apocalyptic imagery, foreshadowing (WWI/WWII).
  • Author’s Intent: Condemn war profiteering and capitalist greed.
  • Context: WWII-era audiences understood war’s horrors; Priestley ties capitalism to conflict
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

the _ younger generation they cant even take a _

A

famous , joke

  • Speaker: Arthur Birling
  • Meaning: Mocks socialist ideals of the younger generation.
  • Plot Lead-up: Birlings dismiss Sheila and Eric’s guilt.
  • Relevance to Play: Shows ruling-class resistance to change.
  • Literary Devices: Sarcasm, generational contrast.
  • Author’s Intent: Highlight entrenched capitalist attitudes.
  • Context: 1945 generational divide; Priestley endorses youth-led reform.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what about this _ring

A

about

  • Speaker: Gerald Croft
  • Meaning: Reduces Sheila’s autonomy to marital status.
  • Plot Lead-up: Gerald attempts to reconcile with Sheila.
  • Relevance to Play: Exposes women’s limited choices.
  • Literary Devices: Symbolism (ring = patriarchal control), manipulation.
  • Author’s Intent: Criticize marriage as women’s only “escape.”
  • Context: Women’s financial dependence on men; Priestley advocates for equality.
18
Q

not yet its too _

A

soon

  • Speaker: Sheila Birling
  • Meaning: Sheila’s hesitant rejection of Gerald’s proposal.
  • Plot Lead-up: Sheila questions Gerald’s sincerity.
  • Relevance to Play: Shows women’s trapped position in patriarchy.
  • Literary Devices: Hesitant tone, symbolism (delay = lack of agency).
  • Author’s Intent: Highlight systemic barriers to female independence.
  • Context: Limited divorce rights in 1912; Priestley critiques marital oppression.