Aggression Flashcards
What does IDA include?
Ethical issuesGender, cultural or historical biasReal world applicationsDeterminismReductionismNature/Nature
What is aggression?
An act carried out with the intention to harm another person.
What is person-oriented aggression?
When the goal is to cause harm to another. This can be through physical or verbal means. It can also occur through showing hostility to another.
What is instrumental aggression?
The goal is to obtain some kind of reward or preferred outcome. This can be played out through coercion of another person.
What is reactive aggression?
A response to a hostile or aggressive situation. Aggression is shown often in response to provocation.
What is sanctioned aggression?
Aggressive behaviour which is either legal or permitted because the ultimate outcome is seen as justifiable.
What does social learning theory say?
That learning can occur simply through observing others-also known as models- in our environment.
What does Bandura say about social learning theory?
That learning occurs from observing others. The mind, behaviour and the environment all play a role in learning behaviour. We learn through observation of models, which may lead to imitation of that behaviour.
What is the advantage of Bandura’s approach to social learning theory?
It deals with the major criticism of behaviourist approach, which ignores mental processes, by taking account of cognitive processes.
What are the four conditions for social learning?
Attention: The individual notices someone in their environmentRetention: The individual remembers what they have observedMoto Reproduction: The individual replicates the behaviour shown by the modelMotivation: The individual seeks to demonstrate the behaviour that they have observed.
What is vicarious reinforcement?
Learning NOT as a result of direct reinforcement, rather an individuals observation of another person’s experiences.
What type of models exist?
Live models; physically present in our environment e.g. mother, teacher, pop star etc.Symbolic Models; e.g. people in films, books, cartoons etc
When is symbolic modelling thought to have a greater effect?
It is considered to have a greater effect on cultures where media is widely available.
Who did the Bobo doll studies?
Albert Bandura
What did the Bobo Doll studies investigate?
It investigated the effects of observing aggressive behaviour
What type of study what the bob doll studies?
It was a laboratory study
What were the aims of the Bobo doll studies?
To demonstrate that if children were witnesses to an aggressive display by an adult they would imitate this aggressive behaviour when given the opportunity.
What were the hypotheses of the Bobo doll studies?
- Children exposed to aggressive models will reproduce aggressive acts resembling those of the mdoels2. Children exposed to non-aggressive models will reproduce less aggressive acts3. Children will imitate the behaviour of a same-sex model to a greater degree than a model of the opposite sex4. Boys will be more predisposed than girls towards imitating aggression
What were the participants in the bobo doll studies?
36 boys & 36 girls, between 37-69 months (mean was 4 years & 4 months) All from Stanford University nursery school, and consent were given by the parents. Children were matched on the bases of their pre-existing aggressiveness.
Who were the models in the bobo doll studies?
One male adult and one female adult.
What were the three conditions of the bobo doll studies?
Aggressive condition, non-aggressive condition and the control group. Each had 24 participants.
What was the aggressive conditions in the bobo doll studies?
24 children observed an adult being aggressive to a bobo doll.
What was the non-aggressive conditions in the bobo doll studies?
24 children observed an adult playing and ignoring a bobo doll.
What was the method used in the bobo doll studies?
- Children were taken to a room with toys in it and either an aggressive or non aggressive model entered the room2. Mild aggression arousal; shown toys they couldn’t play with3. Children observed in another room to see if they imitate behaviour.
What were the results of the bobo doll studies?
- Aggressive group participants reproduced physical & verbal aggression used by model2. Boys produced more physical aggression3. Participants more likely to imitate same-sex model4. Participants were shocked & surprised at female model displaying physical & verbal aggression
What conclusions were drawn from the bobo doll studies?
That learning can take place by observation (supports SLT) as reseach demonstates children will imitate behaviour of others in absence of reward/reinforcement. Children more likely to learn from same sex models (gender differences of aggressive behaviours being imitated)
What did Bandura and Walters find in later bobo doll studies?
Found that children who saw the model being rewarded for aggressive acts showed a high level of aggression in their own play. Those who saw the model being punished showed a low level of aggression in their play. This showed learning by vicarious reinforcement.
How did Bandura later extend the bobo doll studies?
He wanted to find out if punishment had prevented learning or punishment prevented performance of the behaviour. He repeated the study into the role of punishment, but hen offered rewards to all the children for performing the model’s aggressive behaviours. He found the latter to be true, as when offered rewards all three groups showed the same level of imitation.
What were the strengths of the research method used in the bobo doll studies?
It is possible to control extraneous variables, such as making sure that children are matched on aggressiveness so that you can be more certain that it is the IV that caused the aggression shown.
What are the limitations of the research method used in the bobo doll studies?
Reducing behaviour to a simple set of variables may make it meaningless, so we can’t really relate the findings to everyday life- aggression has multiple causes. A lab experiment is a contrived experiment & children may not behave as they normally do.
Why is it difficult to generalise the findings of the bobo doll studies?
- American culture is more aggressive than some cultures, so their may be a cultural bias2. Participants are children so may not be relevant to adolescent or adult behaviour3. Middle-class children used, and they were at Stanford which is a high status and prestigious uni, so can’t generalise tow ider society.
What type of data was collected in the Bobo doll studies?
Quantitative data was collected, for example number of times a child imitated specific acts of violence.
What were the strengths of using quantitative data in the bobo doll studies?
Makes it easier to analyse the data because you can directly compare children in the different conditions. Using such data you can draw a bar char, and do statistical tests to determine if the difference is significant.
What were the limitations of using quantitative data in the bobo doll studies?
Doesn’t explain why some children did imitate the model whilst others didn’t, which could have possibly be found by interview. It also could mask certain trends, for example there were occasions where the children with the aggressive model was less aggressive than the children with the non-aggressive model.
Does the Bobo doll studies suggest that aggression is nature or nurture?
It suggests that aggression can be learned, but there is some evidence that levels of aggression may be innate as the boys were more aggressive than the girls.
What were the ethical issues of the bobo doll studies?
- They taught children to become more aggressive and deliberately provoked them2. The children may have been alarmed watching an aggressive models3. Issues with informed consent with children
Why could the bobo doll studies lack ecological validity?
- People may well not do the same things to a real person as they would a doll2. It doesn’t really help understanding long-term aggression
What study did Bandura do with a clown?
He tried the same study as the bobo doll studies, but used a film where a woman beat a live clown; when the children went into a room with a live clown, they punched, kicked and hit him with hammers just as they had seen in the film.
What is the real world applications of the bobo doll studies?
It is very important in explaining media effects on aggression,
How does social learning theory say children learn aggression?
Through observation of role models. They learn the consequences of aggression by watching others being reinforced or punished (vicarious reinforcement). Thus they learn the behaviours and they also learn whether and when such behaviours are worth repeating.
What did Bandura claim was necessary for social learning to take place?
The child must form mental representations of events in their social environment. The child must also represent possible rewards and punishments for their aggressive behaviour in terms of expectancies of future outcomes. When appropriate opportunities arise in the future, the child will display the learned behaviour as long as the expectation of reward is greater than expectation of punishment.
What is necessarily for reproduction of behaviour in social learning theory?
- Maintenance through direct experience2. Self-efficacy expectancies
What is maintenance through direct experience in social learning theory?
If a child is rewarded for a behaviour, they are likely to repeat the same action in similar situations in the future.
What is self-efficacy expectancies in social learning theory?
IN addition to forming expectancies of the likely outcomes of their aggression, children also develop confidence in their ability to carry out aggressive actions.
What did Philips (1986) find in support of social learning theory?
He found that daily homicide rates in the US almost always increased in the week following a major boxing match, suggesting viewers were imitating behaviour they watched and social learning is evident in adults as well as children.
What is the strengths for social learning theory in regards to aggression?
- Supporting research2. Research has high reliability3. Cultural evidence.
What are the weaknesses of social learning theory in regards to aggression?
- Lacks ecological validity2. Reductionist3. Demand characteristics4. Ethical issues.
What did Patterson et al find in support of aggression? (1989)
He demonstrated that role models are important in the development of anti-social behaviour (in all genders) and that parents are the most important role model. They found that very aggressive children are raised in homes of high aggression, little affection and little positive feedback.
What other study did Bandura do on social learning theoryand the influential role of the entertainment industry?
They found that viewing aggression by cartoon characters produces as much aggression as viewing live or filmed aggressive behaviour by adults.
Why does Bandura’s research have high reliability?
Because his research was predominately carried out in the laboratory where he had complete control over the IV (whether there was positive/negative reinforcmenet) and the DV. This suggests that if the research was carried out again then the same results could be achieved.
What cultural evidence is there for social learning theory?
In the Kung San of the Kalahari desert aggression is rare. Parents do not reward or punish aggressive behaviour they try to distract children, whilst the mundugmor show the opposite pattern, in which violence is the norm and status is determined by the amount of aggression shown. Suggests SLT can be applied universally.
What did Flnagan (2000) discover that criticises social learning theory?
He suggests that testosterone has been cited as a primary cause of aggression and other genetic and neuroanatomical structures are involved. SLT does not stress the importance of biological factors, so suggests it is reductionist.
What are neurotransmitters?
Chermicals stored next to the synapse
How do nerve impulses cross the synapse?
When the action potential reaches the axon terminal it hits a little gap. This is known as a synapse. Chemicals are storned next to the synapse (neurotransmitters), when the AP hits the chemicals they were released into the gap and they jump across. This is an all or nothing response.
Why is crossing the synapse an all or nothing response?
To cross the synapse enough AP must arrive at the terminal in the axon otherwise there will not be enough transmitter released to fire the impulse across.
How is serotonin thought to be linked to aggression?
Thought to reduce aggression by inhibiting the amygdala and therefore the responses to emotional stimuli that might otherwise lead to an aggressive response.
What are low levels of serotonin in the brain associated with?
An increased susceptibility to impulsive behaviour, aggression and even violent suicide.
What study did Mann et Al (1990) do on neural explanations for aggression?
Gave 35 healthy subjects dexflenfluamine which is know to deplete serotonin. Using a questionnaire to assess hostility and aggression levels, they found that dexflenfluamine treatment in males (but not females) was associated with an increase in hostility and aggression scores.
What study did Raleigh et al (1991) do on neural explanations for aggressions?
Using Vervet monkeys, they found that those on high tryptophan diets (which increases serotonin levels in the brain) exhibited decreased levels of aggression and vice versa.
What did Popova et al (1991) do on neural explanations for aggression?
Showed that in animals bred for domestication and docile temperaments show over time increased levels of serotonin.
What are the evidence for the role of serotonin in aggression?
- Evidence from non human studies supports the importance of serotonin2. Evidence from antidepressants. If low levels of serotonin are associated with low impulse control and aggressive behaviour, drugs that clinically raise serotonin levels should produce a concurrent lowering in aggression.
What study did Bond (2005) do on neural explanations for aggression?
Established in clinical trials that antidepressant drugs which elevate serotonin reduce irritability and impulsive aggression.
What is an alternative theory to low levels of serotonin as a cause of aggression?
That low serotonin metabolism (the ability to recycle serotonin at the synaptic clef), which in turns leads to developing a greater number of serotonin recepters.
What did Arora and Meltzer (1989) find about neural explanations for aggression?
Found that victims of violent suicide had increased numbers of serotonin receptors in the prefrontal cortex.
How does alcohol affect serotonin?
Alcohol consumption interferes with the metabolism of serotonin in the brain.
What did Badawy (2006) find about neural explanation for aggression?
Found a link between alcohol consumption and aggressive behaviour, but this is only correlational, and other factors, such as alcohol depression because of depression (linked to low serotonin levels) confuse the issue.
How is Dopamine thought to be linked to aggression?
The link between dopamine and aggression is not as well established but it is thought that increases in dopamine will produce an increase in aggressive behaviour.
What did Lavine (1997) find about neural explanation for aggression?
Increases in dopamine activity via the use of amphetamines have also been associated with aggressive behaviour.
What did Buitelaar (2003) find about neural explanation for aggression?
Antipsychotics, which reduce dopamine activity in the brain, have been shown to reduce aggressive behaviour in violent delinquents.
What is the problem with using dopamine levels as an explanation for aggression?
Evidence is inconclusive about the causal role of dopamine in aggression; recent research suggests that its influence might be as a consequence.
What did Couppis and Kennedy (2008) find about neural explanation for aggression?
Found in mice that, a reward pathway in the brain becomes engaged in response to an aggressive event that the dopamine is involved in as a positive reinforce in this pathway. Individuals will seek out an aggressive encounter to receive a rewarding sensation.
What are the neural explanations for aggression?
The levels of serotonin and Dopamine, which are neurotransmitters.
How is testosterone thought to be linked to aggression?
The male sex hormone testosterone is thought to influence aggression from young adulthood onwards due to its action on brain areas involved in controlling aggression.
What did Dabbs et al (1987) find about hormonal explanations for aggression?
Tested the salivary testosterone in violent and non-violent criminals. Violent criminals had higher testosterone levels.
What did Lindman et al (1987) find about hormonal explanations for aggression?
Young males who were aggressive when drunk had higher testosterone levels than those who did not act aggressive.
What is the problem of using testosterone as an explanation for aggression?
There is inconsistent evidence. Studies which show a positive correlation have used a small sample and have used male prisoners.
What distinction did Mazur (1985) make?
He distinguished between aggression and dominance. In humans the influence of testosterone on dominance is likely to be expressed in more varied and subtle ways.
How is cortisol thought to be linked to aggression?
Cortisol appears to have a mediating effect on other aggression-related hormones such as testosterone.
What did Dabbs et al (1991) find on hormonal explanations for aggression? (Cortisol)
Cortisol increases anxiety and therefore inhibits aggression and increases social withdrawal.
What did Virkkunen (1985) find on hormonal explanations for aggression?
There are low levels of cortisol in habitual violent offenders
What did Tennes and Kreye (1985) find on hormonal explanations for aggression?
There are low levels of cortisol in violent schoolchildren.
What did McBurnett et al (2000) find on hormonal explanations for aggression?
He did a four year study of boys with behaviour problems. Boys with low cortisol levels began antisocial acts at a younger age and exhibited three times the number of aggressive symptoms.
What are the hormonal explanations for aggression?
The role of testosterone and cortisol.
What did Sandberg do (1971)?
First identified what is known as 47 XYY karyotype.
What is 47 XYY Karotype?
It is possible for a male to have an extra Y sex chromonsome making them XYY
What did Court-Brown (1965-67) find on the XYY Karotype?
Found that of a sample of 314 in a high security hospital, 15 were found to have chromosomal abnormalities, including 9 who had an extra Y chromosome. The incidence of XYY in the general population is 1/100, suggesting that having an extra Y chromosome may have predisposed these men to increased aggressive behaviour.
What did Court-Brown conclude about those with XYY?
They would be best kept hospitalised due to an increase likelihood of aggressive behaviour.
What did Milunsky (2004) find on XYY Karotype?
That although XYY people are on average taller than the general population, there is no evidence of increased aggression.
What did Ratcliffe et al (1994) find on XYY Karotype?
That they did not have a higher than average testosterone levels.
What study did Rutter et al (1990) do on genetic explanations for aggression?
Carried out a meta-analysis of twin studies on criminality and found that:Dizygotic twins have concordance rates between 13-22%Monzygotic Twins have concordance rates between 26-51 %
What do twin studies suggest about the causes of aggression?
The differences beween dizygotic twins, who grew up in the same environment is likely due to genetics. BUt as monozygotic twins do not show a 100% concordance rate it cannot just be genetics.
What study did Mednick, Gabrielli &Hutchings (1987) do on genetic explanations for aggression?
They studied the criminal records of all Danish children adopted outside their biological family between 1924 and 1947. They found that having a criminal biological father increased the risk of criminality, but the highest risk was for those with a criminal biological father and a criminal adoptive father.
What is the problem with heritability studies?
They studied criminality, rather than aggressiveness and not all crime is violent. IN fact Mednick et all reported that the largest effect in their study was for non violent crime.
What did Dmitri Belyaev (1950) do?
Tried to reduce the silver fox to make them esier to breed; found that after 18 generations the animals were tame. The silver fox breeding programme was also able to breed extremely vicious silver foxes.
What did Cairnes (1983) do on genetic explanations for aggression?
Found it is possible to breed highly aggressive male and female mice, but this aggressiveness only occurred during mid life.
Why are mice often used in genetic studies?
Because their genes are homologous to those of humans, meaning they produce the same proteins, which are used in a similar way.
What is the MAO-A gene?
Associated with increased aggression. It produces monoamine oxidase, a chemical that is involved int he breakdown of the neurotransmitters serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine in synapses.
Why is the MAO-A thought to influence aggression?
It is thought that having too little of the MAO-A gene leads to the brain being flooded with too much serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine, which eventually leads to a lowered sensitivity to these neurotransmitters. Low sensitivity is equivalent to low activity.
What study did Moffat et al (2002) do on genetic explanations for aggression?
Conducted a longitudinal study of 422 males in New Zealand. He studied their history of abuse and criminal convictions, their penchant for violence and any symptoms of antisocial personality disorder. His findings showed that there was a link between MAO-A and the risk of being convicted of a violent crime, but only when participants also suffered abuse as children.
Why was XYY Karotype thought to increase aggression in the 1960-70s?
A popular theory was that males who have inherited an extra Y chromosome are more ‘male’ and therefore more aggressive. However, this has been shown to be incorrect.
What is cuckoldry?
A man may unwittingly invest resources in rearing children that are not his own
What is direct guarding?
Restricting a partner’s movements
What are negatives inducements?
Financial control, threat of violence is they are unfaithful or even so much as look at another man
What is uxorocide?
Wife killing
What is sexual coercion?
Partner rape
What is jealousy?
Emotional response to anticipated loss of affection and/or status
What is infidelity?
Unfaithfulness of sexual partners.
What is often cited as the cause of violence in interpersonal relationships?
Male sexual jealousy as a result of real or suspected infidelity.
What did Daly and Wilson find about domestic abuse?
Verbal aggression and non-lethal physical violence against mates is often similar in men and women, but spousal homicide by women is less frequent and often due to defense against a jealous abusive husband. Young wives/girlfriends are also more likely to be killed them older ones.
What did Guttmacher (1955) find about domestic abuse?
In a study of 36 Baltimore spousal homicides, 25 were attributed to jealousy and the wives were the victims in 24 of these cases
What did Hilberman and Munson (1978) find about domestic abuse?
In a study of battered women, 57/60 attributed the violence to their husband’s extreme jealousy and possessiveness.
What did Whitehurst (1971) find about domestic abuse?
In 100 cases of spousal violence, the husbands’ frustration over their inability to control their wives and accusations of infidelity were the most reported causal factors.
What do evolutionary psychologists propose as an explanation to sexual jealousy and the resulting violence?
A man can never be certain that he is the father of his wife’s children unless he prevents her having relationships with other men. This can explain why male sexual jealousy is often cited as a cause of domestic violence. Therefore men are always at risk of cuckoldry. The adaptive functions of sexual jealousy would be to deter a mate from sexual infidelity.
What did Buss (1988) suggests about mate retention and violence?
That males have a number of strategies that have evolved specifically for the purpose of keeping a mate. These include:1. Restricting their partners autonomy (direct guarding)2. Negative inducements in the form of violence or threats of violence to prevent her from strayingThose who are perceived by their partner to be threatening infidelity are more at risk of violence than those who are not.
What did Dobash and Dobash (1984) find about domestic abuse?
That the majority of cases of battered women cite extreme jealousy as the key cause of violence towards them.
What did Daly et al (1982) find about domestic violence?
That male sexual jealousy is claimed to be the single most common motivation for killings in domestic disputes in the US
What did Dell (1984) find about domestic violence?
That 17% of all cases of murder in the UK are linked to sexual jealousy.
What was found in a summary of eight studies of same sex killings involving love triangles?
They found that 92% were male-male murders and only 8% female-female murders.
What was the aim of Shakelford et al (2005) study on aggression in relation to evolutionary psychology?
To investigate male retention strategies with married couples.
What was the method of Shakelford et al (2005) study on aggression in relation to evolutionary psychology?
A survey method, with a sample of 461 men and 560 women in the USA. Male participants answered questions about their use of mate retention techniques, and were assessed on how often they performed each of 26 different types of violent act against their partners. Female PP answered questions concerning their partner’s use of retention techniques.
What was the results of Shakelford et al (2005) study on aggression in relation to evolutionary psychology?
Men’s use of intersexual negative inducements and direct guarding was positively correlated with their violence scores. Use of emotional manipulation as a specific tactic appeared to consistently predict men’s violence against women. Female results confirmed this trend. Females reported that those who used mate retention strategies were most likely to use violence. Age of relationship made no different.
What was the conclusion of Shakelford et al (2005) study on aggression in relation to evolutionary psychology?
There findings are consistent with the claim of evolutionary psychology that mate retention strategies are evoked when a particular adaptive problem is faced, in this case the belief that the wife in unfaithful.
What did Takahashi et al (2006) find about aggression in relation to evolutionary psychology?
Used brain imaging techniques to investigate the activity in the amygdala and hypothalamus whilst subjects imagined scenes depicting sexual infidelity and emotional jealousy. They found that men much greater activity when presented with scenes depicting sexual infidelity in their mate.
In what ways could aggressive behaviour be seen as adaptive?
Gain territory and resources Defending against attacks: aggression to prevent loss of resources and status necessary for reproductive fitness iInflicting cost on same sex-rivals: aggression between same sex members to aid in the competition for resources and mates Negotiating status and power hierarchies: aggression to gain prestige and dominance among same-sex members Deterring rivals from future aggression: aggression to maintain dominance and fear in othersDeterring mates from infidelity: aggression against opposite-sex members to maintain fidelity of desired long-term mates and ensuring paternity
Why is a male more likely to be aggressively jealous?
HUman males cannot risk wasting investment on offspring who are not their own so they should show more jealous violent aggression relating to female fidelity.
Why might a female be aggressively jealous to a partner?
If a male is unfaithful the female partner risks losing his time, resources, energy, protection and commitment to her children.
What did Daly and Wilson find about male-male aggression?
Cross-culturally, human violent aggression and homicide is far more common in males, against other males. Homicide is more common in poor and unmarried men than richer, married ones.
What did Buss and Dedden (1990) find about female-female aggression?
It is more verbal against other women to maintain status and reduce the attractiveness of competitors, especially by using verbal criticism of the physical unattractiveness of other females and their promiscuity to lower their appeal in the eyes of men.
What did Daly et al (1982) find about infidelity and aggression?
The detection or suspicion of infidelity is a key predictor of partner violence.
What did Goetz et al (2008) find about infidelity and aggression?
That a consequence of men’s perception or suspicions of their wives sexual infidelity is partner rape.
What did Camilleri (2004) find about infidelity and aggression?
That sexual assault of a female by a male partner was directly linked with the perceived risk of her infidelity.
What did Sheilds and Hanneke (1983) find about infidelity and aggression?
Found that female victims of partner rape were more likely to have engaged in extra-marital sex.
According to evolutionary psychology what is the purpose of violence towards pregnant partners?
When a women is pregnant with another man’s child then the purpose of violence is to terminate the pregnancy and therefore eliminate potential offspring and also leave her free to bear offspring for him.
According to evolutionary psychology how can men guard against their partner’s infidelity?
- Providing benefits to the women, money, housing etc. 2. Use violence or threats of violenceHowever this could result in the unintended outcome of death.
What did Camilleri & Quinsey (2009) find about infidelity and aggression?
Men convicted of raping their partners were more likely to have experienced cuckoldry risks prior to their offence compared to men convicted of non-sexual partner abuse.
What did Burch and Gallup (2004) find about violence towards pregnant partners?
That frequency of violent acts towards pregnant mates was roughly double than towards those who were not pregnant, with sexual jealousy characterising those who committed violence against their pregnant partners.
What did Taillieue and Brownride (2010) find about violence towards pregnant partners?
Found that women abused while pregnant were more likely to be carrying the child of a man other than her current mate
What did Valladares et al (2005) find about violence towards pregnant partners?
Nicaraguan study found that half of the sample of pregnant women physically abused by their partners had suffered blows directed at their stomachs to increase the probability of an abortion.
What are the limitations of evolutionary explanations of partner violence?
Cannot explain why different people react in different ways to the same problem. Androcentric- women also use mate retention strategies and behave violentlyThere are cultural difference in uxoricide rates and the degree of anxiety felt in response to infidelityDoes it justify violence? ReductionistDeterminist
Why could it be argued that the evolutionary explanation is not gender biased?
The evolutionary explanation account for male and female differences in their experiences of infidelity and jealousy as due to different selective pressures.
What does the power-threat hypothesis state?
That groups which pose a threat to the majority are more likely to be discriminated against and subjected to violent action, such as lycning.
What does Sosis (2004) believe about the costly signalling theory?
That engaging in a painful religious ritual has been favoured by natural selection as it signals commitment to membership, and deters people who are not true believers joining these groups.
What is considered to be the adaptive value of warfare?
. TerritoryGenocide (removal of competition)Mating success (status)Kin selection
What did Chagnon observe about warfare?
Naturalistic observation of the Yanomamo tribe in the Amazon rainforest, frequent fighting between villages over abduction of women. Success in battle lead to high status, so successful warriors had more wives and children. Young men who had not killed were arely married.
What did Pinker (1997) find about warfare?
In WW2 Germans raped women in concentration camps.
What did Divale and Harris (1976) find about aggressive displays?
That displays of aggressiveness and bravery are attractive to females
What did Chagnon (1988) find about aggressive displays?
That male warriors in traditional socieites tend to have more sexual partners and more children suggesting a direct reproductive benefit.
What could be the benefit of costly displays of aggression?
Signals of commitment- displays such as scars and mutilations mean commitment to the group, and minimises the likelihood of males absconding to another group.
What is the problem with the view that warfare is evolutionary adaptive?
In recent human history, prolonged warfare results in significant losses on both sides, which could suggest that warfare is actually maladaptive. Does not explain astonishing levels of cruelty in war. It can’t be ‘in the genes’ as we only adapted to fight when we were no longer nomadic and we were protecting our ‘site’.
What did Palmer and Tilley (1995) find about aggressive displays?
Male gang members have more sexual partners than normal males
What could be the adaptive value of sports events?
- Success in sports can be linked to status and therefore greater potential access to resources2. For the fans this is affiliation with a dominant group and superiority over subordinate groups, a greater place in social hierarcy, and being more attractive by proxy.
How could aggression in sport events be seen as adaptive?
Aggression is linked with victory in some team sports and as such a display of real or ritualised aggression may increase chances of victory either physical dominance or intimidation. Even in minimial contact sports, teams ‘sledge’ or ‘psych out’ t heir opponents to gain the upper hand.
What did Maxwell & Viscek (2009) find about aggression in sports event?
Questioned 144 rugby union players about their aggression in the game. Those high in professionalism placed more emphasis on winning and were more likely to use unsanctioned aggression.
What did Cialdini et al (1976) find about aggression in sports events?
“basking in reflected glory”- after a uni football team had performed well, students more likely to wear uni scarves and sweaters.
How could sport events be territorial?
Statistically speaking, sport teams playing at home win more than when they play away. When hooliganism in football was at it’s highest, a common feature of it would be for away fans to go to the town/city early and to ‘take’ opposition fans traditional areas (like a pub near the ground)
What is xenophobia?
An irrational or unreasoned fear of that which is perceived to be foreign or strange.