Aggression Flashcards
What is the hypothalamus responsible for
The hypothalamus is responsible for the regulation of the autonomic nervous system, which in turn regulates responses to emotional circumstances.
What is the amygdala responsible for?
The amygdala is responsible for attaching emotional significance to sensory information.
What is the limbic system?
The limbic system is believed to be hierarchical with signals being passed from the lower systems to the higher systems in the prefrontal cortex where feelings are monitored and interpreted, which then triggers a physical response.
The prefrontal cortex in relation to aggression
The prefrontal cortex is crucial for regulating social behaviour and aggressive responses. Damage to the prefrontal cortex would reduce the inhibition of the amygdala resulting in higher levels of aggression.
Kluver and Bucy (1939)
Kluver and Bucy (1939) were early researchers who, using Rhesus monkeys, removed the main areas of the limbic system including the amygdala, hippocampus and surrounding cortical areas. They found that the monkeys displayed an absence of emotional, motor and vocal reactions normally associated with stimuli or situations eliciting fear and anger. Lesioned monkeys also lost the social understanding of group hierarchies and would try to fight the more dominant and larger members of the group. This research demonstrates the importance of the limbic system in regulating aggressive responses.
One of the main criticisms of research using animals to provide evidence for aggression in humans is the differences between animal and human physiology and the question of whether we can extrapolate research findings from animals to human aggressive behaviour. Despite humans and monkeys both possessing similar neural structures, we cannot be sure that the processes involved in mediating aggression in humans are the same as those shown in animals such as the Rhesus monkey.
Gospic et al (2011)-The Ultimatum game
• 2 players- the proposer; the responder
• Way, wop over pettentiesplit money in a certain
• If the responder accepts the money is split as
proposed
• If the responder rejects the offer, both receive
nothing
There is supporting evidence which demonstrates the importance of the limbic system in the regulation of aggression….
There is supporting evidence which demonstrates the importance of the limbic system in the regulation of aggression. For example, Kluver and Bucky 1939 through their study which included rhesus monkeys and the removal of parts of the limbic system such as the amygdala and hippocampus in these monkeys’ established changes in these monkeys. One such example of a change in behaviour is the newly found absence of emotional, motor and vocal reactions which are normally displayed when in a fearful/angry situation. Moreover, the monkeys also lacked social understandings of the group and so attempted to fight with larger, more dominant monkeys. Therefore, through their study we are able to appreciate the limbic system and its vital role in the maintenance of normal reactions when exposed to a stimulus which would illicit a particular emotion and so action as a result, an important and innate process needed for survival.
However, a major limitation of the study is the use of monkeys, a type of animal to illustrate human behaviours such as an aggression.…
However, a major limitation of the study is the use of monkeys, a type of animal to illustrate human behaviours such as an aggression. Humans and animals have significantly different physiological and so there is an issue of extrapolating such findings to explain aggression in humans. Although, both humans and monkeys have similarities between structures, the processes involved when aggression is displayed, we are unsure of and so cannot be sure that they are similar in the two species. For this reason, further implications are introduced if we were to extrapolate and incorporate these findings in the creation of laws and social practices.
Ferrari et al. (2003)
♦ They allowed adult male rats to fight with another rat at a specific time for ten days. On the eleventh day, the rat wasn’t allowed to fight.
♦ However, researchers found that the rat’s dopamine levels had raised by 65%, and his serotonin levels were reduced by 35%.
♦ Despite the fact that the rat was not fighting, the experience had changed the rat’s brain chemistry.
There is supporting evidence for the serotonin hypothesis…
There is supporting evidence for the serotonin hypothesis. For example, Virkkunen et al (1994) found levels of serotonin to be significantly lower in offenders. Similarly, Ferrari et al (2003) found that after a mouse displayed aggressive behaviour multiple times serotonin levels were shown to have decreased by 35% whilst dopamine levels increased by 65%. This supports the biological claims in which aggression is shown to be as a result of hormonal imbalances as illustrated by the findings of the studies. For this reason, we can place our confidence in the neural hypothesis and so confidently draw conclusions.
However, these studies merely establish a correlation in which cause and effect cannot be distinguished.…
However, these studies merely establish a correlation in which cause and effect cannot be distinguished. The research raises the question of whether lower levels of serotonin cause aggression or if they are as a result of expressing aggression. For this reason, the findings are limited and so further research is required for us to fully understand the role of serotonin in aggression. Nevertheless, this research does demonstrate the complexity of the role of serotonin in aggressive behaviour.
Moreover, the serotonin hypothesis has practical application; from the hypothesis we are able to advice those experiencing high levels of aggression…
Moreover, the serotonin hypothesis has practical application; from the hypothesis we are able to advice those experiencing high levels of aggression. For example, foods that increase serotonin levels such as walnuts and bananas can be advised to increase serotonin levels and thus, decrease aggression levels. Therefore, we are able to apply the hypothesis to predict and treat increased aggression in individuals. Furthermore, there are positive societal implications; if we are able to effectively treat aggression by increasing serotonin levels, violent crime rates and the number of individuals institutionalized along with the levels of institutionalised aggression would decrease. Additionally, such advice could help improve life quality Aswell as having both a direct and indirect effect on the economy.
Hormonal Mechanisms in Aggression:
Testosterone
- Testosterone is an androgen (male sex hormone) present in significantly larger concentrations in men, compared to women, and is responsible for the production of male facial characteristics and reproductive organs, being secreted from the pineal gland.
- There may be a link between decreased testosterone levels and decreased levels of aggressive behaviour, a positive correlation demonstrated by castration studies.
•Nelson (1995)
• Nelson (1995) found that there was a positive correlation between levels of testosterone circulating in the body and aggressive behaviour in female and male prisoners.
• Wagner, Beuving and Hutchinson (1979)
• Wagner, Beuving and Hutchinson (1979) show that if a mouse is castrated, overall levels of aggression tend to reduce, as testosterone is produced in the testes. If a castrated mouse receives testosterone aggression levels increase.