Agency & Partnerships Flashcards
What is agency?
Agency is a fiduciary relation that
* results from the manifestation of consent, by one person (principal) to another (agent)
* that the other shall act on his behalf and subject to his control
* and consent by the other to so act.
Control in Agency
- The agent must act subject to the principal’s control, but the degree of control exercised by the principal doesn’t have to be significant or extensive.
- Sufficient if principal specifies tasks agent should perform.
Capacity in agency
- Principal must have contractal capcity.
- Agent doesn’t need contractual capacity (can be minor, but must have some mental capacity)
Writing Requirement for Agency
- Appointment of an agent doesn’t require writing unless the agency is for more than one year.
- However, statute of frauds may be required for a specific task becuase of the equal dignities rule.
Is consideration needed to create an agency relationship?
No.
Agency creation by Estoppel
An agency may be created through estoppel - requires third-party reliance on the principal’s communication.
fiduiciary duty
The higest duty that the law can impose.
Think principally about the interest of the principal. Consists of:
* duty of care
* duty of loyalty
* duty of obedience.
* express contractual duties
fiduciary duty of care
- Reasonable care under the circumstances
- Sliding scale depending on special skills of agent
fiduciary duty of loyalty
- Basically a duty of fairness toward principal.
- Agent cannot put their interests or the interests of third parties above the interests of the principal.
fiduciary duty of obedience
- Agent must obey all reasonable directions of their principal.
- If the agent disobeys a reasonable direction, the agent will be liable to the principal for any loss that the principal suffers.
- Could be considered an aspect of duty of loyalty.
Principal’s remedies against agent
- Contract remedies (if agent compensated) (damages/disgourgement)
- Tort remedies
- Constructive trust
- Action for secret profits
- Withhold compensation
- Terminate agency
subagent and coagent
subagent - a person appointed by an agent to perform functions that the agent has consented to perform on behalf of the agent’s principal. An agent has absolute liability to the principal for breaches by a subagent. If the principal authorized the agent to appoint the subagent, the subagent owes the principal the same duties as the agent owes the principal.
coagent - another agent of the principal. Employees of a single organization are presumed to be coagents, not subagents
principals duty to agent
Principal’s Duties
* Not fiduciary in nature.
* Compensation
* Cooperation
* Indemnity/reimbursement
* Express contractual duties
Agent’s Remedies
* A compensated agent has the usual contract remedies against the principal (but has a duty to mitigate damages).
* possessory lien
Actual authority
Express: Authority that’s conveyed by the principal in words (oral or written). Mistake is no defense for the principal.
Implied: Authority that the agent reasonably believes they possess based on the principal’s words/actions. Inlcudes authority:
* Incidental to express authority
* Arising out of custom known to the agent
* Resulting from prior acquiescence by the principal
* To take emergency measures
* To delegate authority in cases of ministerial acts, where circumstances require, where performance is impossible without delegation, or where delegation is customary
* To pay for and accept delivery of goods where there is authority to purchase
* To give general warranties as to fitness and quality and grant customary covenants in land sales, collect payment,and deliver where there is authority to sell AND
* To manage investments in accordance with the “prudent investor” standard
* to conduct actions pursuant to the title or
position given to them by the principal.
Termination of Actual Authority
Termination of actual authority may occur by
* occurance of a contractually defined event
* lapse of reasonable time
* change in circumstances such as insolvency/change of law/destruction of subject matter
* agent’s breach
* unilateral termination by either party
* operation of law (such as death) with notice
Irrevocable agencies
an agency cannot be terminated by principal nor operation of law if the agency was given to protect the agent’s (or a third party’s) rights and it is supported by consideration.
Apparent authority
1) the third party dealing with the agent has a reasonable belief in the agent’s authority
2) the belief was generated by some act or omission by the principal, “holding out” the agent as possessing the authoirty.
In an apparent authority situation, you need to discuss what transpired between the principal and the third party.
Apparent authority through agent exceeding actual authority
There are situations where the agent exceeds their authority, yet the principal is still bound. These inlcude:
* Prior Acts: Where the principal previously permitted the agent to exceed their express or implied authority and knows that the third party is aware of this.
* Position of Power: The power is implied by the position or title that the princial has bestowed upon the agent, if such title/position customarily confers the power in question.
Apparent authority through Principals omissions
Generally, a principal will not be bound if they did not hold the agent out as having authority. Two exceptions
* Imposters: negligently permitted by principal will create agency by estoppel for any victim 3rd party.
* Lingering Apparent Authority: Agent used to have authority no longer does but principal has not actually or constructively notified third parties who have previosuly dealt with former agent, or has not recovered written evidence of authority.
- Death of Prinicpal: The majority view is that death or incompetency of the principal does not automatically terminate the agent’s apparent authority.
Inherent Authority
Inherent authority is derived solely from the agency relationship and results in the principal being bound even though the agent had no actual or apparent authority to perform the particular act.
Imposed by courts.
Inlcudes:
* Respondeat Superior
* Conduct similar to that authorized
Authority by ratification
Agent did not have authoirty to do something but the principal subsequently validates the act either:
* expressly: through oral or written affirmation, or
* Impliedly by affirming or accepting the benefit, or by silience if there was a duty to disaffirm.
- requires that the prinicipal knew the material facts, had capacity, and accepted the entire transaction (cannot impliedly ratify a part only)
Limits on principal’s ability to ratify
- Generally, a “principal” may ratify anything unless: (1) performance was illegal at the time of ratification, (2) the third party has withdrawn, or (3) there has been a material change in circumstances
- The majority rule is that a principal may not ratify if they were not disclosed by the agent (the third party either did not know there was a principal, or did not know their identity).
When is the Principal liable on the contract?
Principal is bound where valid authority existed (actual authority, apparent authority, or ratification)
When is the third party liable on the contract?
Third party is bound to principal if valid authority existed and principal enforces.
Third party is bound to agent if principal was unidentified or undisclosed and agent enforces contract, but principal is still entitled to contract benefits.
When is the Agent liable on the contract?
If principle is undisclosed or partially disclosed, the principal is still liable, but so is the agent.
Agent is only not liable if the principal was fully disclosed.
Prinicipal direct Tort liability
In addition to vicarious liability, a principal may be directly liable for their own negligence in hiring, retaining, or supervising the agent. A principal may also be directly liable for an agent’s tort if they gave the agent actual authority to commit the tort or ratified the tort, or in other circumstances involving independent contractors
Principal’s vicaious Tort liability Respondeat Superior
1) is the agent an employee of the principal? Principals usually not liable for independent contractors. Employee if principal holds the right to control the manner in which the agent performs their work.
2)** was the tort committed within the scope of employment?** If no, Principal not liable.
Principal’s vicaious Tort liability to independent contractors
Principal may still be liable if:
1) the activity involved inherently dangerous, 2) the duty nondelegable, or
3) the principal knowingly selected an incompetent independent contractor.
The Right to Control and the employee/employer relationship
A party will be considered an employee of the principal rather than a contractor if the principal holds the right to control the manner in which the agent performs their work.
Factors for right to control:
* The degree of skill required on the job
* Whose tools and facilities are used
* The period of employment
* The basis of compensation (time/job)
* The relationship of work to the business purpose
* Whether the person has a distinct business
* The characterization and understanding of the parties.
* The customs of the locality regarding supervision of work
Meaning of the scope of employment
Was the conduct “of the kind” that the agent was hired to perform?
* similar or incidental to that which was authorized
Did the tort occur “on the job” (that is, within the time and space limits of the employment)?
* Detour – minor departure from scope of employment – Employer Liable.
* Frolic – major departure from scope of employment – Employee Liable.
Was the conduct motivated at least in part to serve the principal?
* The employee’s invitation to passengers, unless expressly authorized by the employer, is generally held to be outside the scope of the employment relationship.
* The employer is not liable for torts caused by the use of substantially different (more dangrous) instrumentalities from those authorized
* If the employee makes a trip with two purposes, it will be within the scope of employment if any substantial purpose of the employer is being served.
**Principal can validly ratify agent’s tortuous actions only if they have all material facts. **
Principal’s vicaious liability for intentional torts.
The general rule is that the employer is not liable for the intentional torts of an employee unless:
* Employee is acting to further the employer’s purposes(overzealous)
* Force is authorized in the employment (bouncer)
* Friction is generated by the employment (bill collector)
Liability for “borrowed” employes
The key issue is who has the primary right of
control over the employee. That principal is liable.
Employer-Employee by Estoppel
Where a principal creates the appearance of an employer-employee relationship upon which a third party relies, that principal will be estopped from denying the relationship and will be liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior
Vicarious Tort liability through Apparent authority
A principal is vicariously liable where an agent appears to deal or communicate on behalf of the principal and the agent’s apparent authority enables the agent to (1) commit a tort or (2) conceal its commission.
Stages to consider for principal contract liability
Is a principal liable to a third party on a contract entered into by an agent?
* Did the agent have actual or apparent authority at the time of the contract, or did the principal ratify the contract later?
* If so, the principal is liable on the contract (but usually, the agent is not).
Stages to consider for principal Tort liability
Is an employer liable for a tort committed by an employee?
* Was the tort committed by an employee in the scope of employment?
* If so, the employer (master) and employee (servant) are jointly and severally liable to the third party.
What is a Partnership?
- A partnership is an association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit.
- Doesn’t matter if they didnt intend to form a partnership.
- Profit Sharing = rebuttable presumption of partnership.
- simply loaning money does not create a partnership
- A “person” may be an individual, trust, corporation, partnership, or other entity.
- Co-ownership = control
- Other idicators inlcude capital contributions, mutual agency, property held in joint tenancy or in common, parties designation as partnership, the venture undertaken is extensive, sharing of gross returns.
- can rebut with no right to control or no requirement to join in losses.
- No writing requirement under partnership law, but equal dignity rule applies
- General partnership is the default form.
Other requirements:
* Contracting capacity
* Legality of purpose
* Express or implied consent of all partners.