Agency Flashcards
Partnership Formation
- a partnership is form when 2 or more people associate to carry on as co-owners a business for profit
- no requirement formal writing or that the parties subjectively intend to form a partnership, just that they intended to run a business together
- Intent can be implied from their conduct- sharing profits
Authority In Partnership
- Every partner is an agent of the partnership and acts of one will bind the partnership
- Actual Authority: authority partner reasonably believes he has based on communication between the partnership and the partner by either the partnership agreement or consent of partners. If act is within ordinary course of business, partners may confer actual authority with a majority vote
- Apparent Authority: authority that a third party would reasonably believe a partner has by being held out by the partnership as a partner- if in ordinary course of business action will bind the partnership even if there is no actual authority if the other person believes they have authority
Partnership Dissolution
- Right to Resign: resignation is dissociation- change in relationship of partners caused by a partner ceasing to be associated with the partnership. Dissociation occurs on a number of events, but also with the express will to withdraw.
- Issue: whether the dissociation is caused dissolution and whether the dissociation is wrongful
- Generally partner may dissociate at will without penalty
- Wrongful dissociation: if if the dissociation is in breach of express provision of partnership agreement (definitive term or undertaking) if wrongful, they are liable for any partnership for any damages and may not partake in winding up
- If no particular duration or undertaking- partnership is at will
- At will partnerships: express will to withdraw automatically triggers dissolution
- Winding up: if express, will automatically triggers dissolution, partnership continues through dissolution through winding up and can vote at any time by unanimous vote to continue
- Right to contingent fees: hinges on timing if the outgoing partner is entitled. If the fee is owed during winding up, they are entitled
Personal Liability in Partnership
- Partners are jointly and severally liable for all obligations of the partnership. Must 1) serve the partner 2) judgment creditor must first seek satisfaction from the partnership then from the partners personally if not covered by partnership assets
Duty of Obedience
- If agent of the partnership/corp you have a duty to obey all reasonable instructions and not act outside of authority. Selling property without consulting the corp is lacking consult with partners
Titled Property
- Partnership property if 1) titled in partnership name, 2) titled in name of more than one partner and the title states the capacity of the partner or 3) was purchased with partnership funds.
- Presumed Separate: 1) no mention of capacity or partnership, 2) purchased with separate funds
- Common Law: if no title, apply CL factors: 1) acquired or improved with partnership funds or 2) whether it is closely related to partnership business
Fiduciary Duty of Loyalty
- Duty of Loyalty requires
1) Account for all profits or other benefits derived by the partner in connection with partnership business
2) Not deal with the partnership as one with an adverse interested
3) Not compete with partnership - Breach: failure to do any of the above results in breach, if profits gained by partner, must account to business for lost profits
Agency
- Agency is a consensual relationship that arises when the principal manifests and intention that the agent shall act on their behalf
- To form both the principal and the agent must consent to relationship
- Formalities: no writing required, just the principal must have contractual capacity and agent must have minimal mental capacity
Independent Contractor
- Most important factor of determining whether a person is an employee or IC, is whether the principal has the right to control the manner and method in which the worker does their job: employ-subject to the supervision of principal, IC: follow their own discretion
Liability to 3rd Party Seller
- Issue: whether the agent had authority to enter into the transaction and under what circumstances they are liable
- DO authority definition and analysis
- Generally, both the p and are liable on a contract entered into by an authorized agent on behalf of an undisclosed p to the third party
- Liability to each other: the a must be compensated and reimbursed of expenses or losses incurred while discharging the a’s duties. P owes a duty to indemnify them for any legal liability reasonably incurred while acting for the p unless the liability was due to a own fault
Authority
- Actual: the agent reasonable believes they have authority based on dealings between themselves and the principal
- Apparent: arises when the principal holds out another as having authority and the third party believes it exists
1) Express: specifically contained in the communication from p to a that grants authority
2) Implied: that which they reasonably believes he has based on the action of the p - Ratification:
Issues
1) Tort and third party liability committed by an agent
2) Contract liability to third party entered into by agent
3) Responsibilities between parties
Respondent Superior/Vicarious Liability
The principal is liable for torts committed by the agent if
1) There is a principal-agent relationship
2) Tort committed in scope of the relationship
Principal Agent Relationship
First element for principal agent relationship
Agency: ABC
1) Assent: informal agreement b/w principal with capacity and agent- voluntary and assenting
2) Benefit: agent at work on behalf of or for the benefit of the principal
3) Control: principal must have the right to control the agent by having power to supervise agent’s performance
Subagent
- SUBAGENT: Principal instructs agent and there is another helper: is principal now liable? The principal will be liable if there is assent, benefit, and control
- Typically with a subagent there is no assent or control, only benefit so no vicarious liability
Borrowed Agent
principal who borrows employer #2 agent and commits tort, is principal liable? If assent, benefit, and control between the borrowing principal and the borrowed agent
- Typically: Assent and benefit is found, but there is no right to control a borrowed agent , so no vicarious liability – Independent Contractor
Independent Contractors
- Difference between agents and control: no right to control, no power to supervise the manner of their performance- so never any vicarious liability
Exceptions for Vicarious Liability
1) Inherently dangerous activities: if tort during inherently dangerous activity- demolition
2) Estoppel: if you hold out your independent contractor with appearance of agency- wearing their uniform
Scope of Relationship
Second element for principal agent relationship
Test for Scope: Based on weight
1) Scope of employment- conduct within the job description
2) **Where & When: folic and detour
Frolic: new and independent journey- outside of scope
Detour: mere departure of assigned task- in scope
3) Intended to Benefit Principal- any benefit, even partial, will be within scope
Intentional Torts: Vicarious Responsibility
- Generally outside of the scope of employment
- Except:
1) Authorized by the principal
2) Natural from the nature of employment- security guards or bouncers
3) Motivated by a desire to serve the principal
Types of Authority
- Actual
- Apparent
- Ratification
Actual Authority: Express
Express authority can be oral or private
Except if the contract itself must be in writing, then the authority to enter into the contract must also be in writing- usually the conveyance of land for more than one year
Revocation/termination: either the P or A can terminate, actual authority dies with the death or incapacity of principal and estate is not liable for the contract, unless there was a durable power of attorney
Durable Power of Atty: written expression of authority to enter into transaction with conspicuous survival language
Narrowly construed: narrowly tailored to the words used
Actual Authority: Implied
Necessity: actual implied authority to do all tasks which are required to accomplish the expressly authorized task- close the deal can rent conference room
Custom: performed by the agent’s title or position
Prior Acquiescence: authority to do all tasks agent believes authorized by prior acts- if they have done them in the past without objection, they can keep going
Apparent Authority
Factors: 1) Principal cloaks agent with the appearance of authority and 2) the third party relies on that authority
Example: Charles owns an antique store. A shipment of antique clocks arrives from London. Charles tells his employee Dufus not to sell a special grandfather clock. Charles goes to lunch. Dufus sells the clock. Is Charles bound on the sales contract? Yes, the principal is liable on its authorized contracts. In this case, there was no express or implied authority. But, there will be apparent authority because Charles did cloak Dufus with apparent authority and the third party may rely on that authority. Therefore Charles is reliable because the principal cloaked and the third party relied