advanced implant options Flashcards
bone loss timelinewith extractions
rehab options?
bone resorb patterns of max and man
bone types
integration times based on bone type
properties of bone grafts
osteogenesis, osteoinduction, osteoconduction
osteogenesis
- viable cells contribute to new bone formation
osteoinduction
- proteins, factors, hormones modulate host cells
osteoconduction
- matrix/scaffold onto which new bone can form
autogenous bone graft
- from?
- preffered? properties?
- donor sites
- forms?
- Cortical vs. Cancellous?
- Same individual
- Gold standard : Osteogenic, osteoinductive, & osteoconductive
- Extra-oral vs. intra-oral donor sites
- Intra-membraneous vs. cartilaginous
- Block vs. particulate forms
- Cortical vs. Cancellous
cons of autogenous
- Need for second operative site
- Insufficient amount of bone
cortical autogenous graft advantages
more bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs) & better structural support
cancellous autogenous graft advantage
more osteoblast precursor cells for greater osteogenic potential
healing time of autogenous graft
Healing time 3~7months
extra oral autogenous donor sites
skull, ribs, illiac crest, tibia
intra oral autogenous sites
man symphasis
ramus
Symphysis vs Ramus
as donor sites
allogratft
- From?
*properties - Types of Allografts?
- From other individuals of the same species
- Cadavers
- Tissue bank
* Osteoinduction & osteoconduction - Types of Allografts
- Freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA): 6-15 months
- Demineralized freeze-dried (DFDBA) 6 months
- Irradiated bone (2.5 million rads)
allograft advantages
- available?
- Eliminates?
- Reduced?
- Decreases?.
- Fewer?
- Ready availability
- Eliminate second surgery
- Reduced anesthesis & surgical time
- Decrease blood loss
- Fewer complication
allograft disadvantages
- Associated with the use of
tissues from another person - Immune responses
xenograft
- from?
- what is it?
- Highly?
- Rapid revitalized through?
- resorbtion?
- Different species
- Anorganic bone treated to remove its organic component
- Highly osteoconductive
- Rapid revitalized through new blood vessels
- Slowly resorbing matrix structure (6 months ~)
alloplasts properties
* Natural or Synthetic?
* Mostlywhat property?
* Variety of?
* Crystalline or amorphous?
* Granular or molded?
* take longer to?
- Natural or Synthetic
- Mostly osteoconductive
- Variety of textures, sizes, and shapes
- Crystalline or amorphous
- Granular or molded
- take longer to absorb
Type of Alloplastic Bone Graft material
I. Ceramic : HA, TCP
II. Calcium Carbonate : Bio Coral
III. Biocompatible composite polymer
IV. Bioactive glass ceramic : Bio-glass
barrier membrane characteristics
Biocompatible?
Stability for?
Manipulable?
closure form?
Biocompatible
Stability for space maintenance
Manipulability
Primary closure throughout healing period is essential to GBR outcome
non-resorb barrier membranes
GOldstandard for?
Optimal?
Polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE, TR e-PTFE), or titanium mesh
* Titanium Reinforced PTFE Membranes (TR e-PTFE), Ti-Enforced microporous (ePTFE)
Gold standard for GBR
Optimal graft containment
nonresorb barrier mem cons
flap management
- 2nd surgical procedure to remove membrane
natural resorb barrier membranes
made of?
- degrades?
- Limited ability to?
- retention time frame?
Natural: collagen of animal origin
- Enzymatic degradation
- Limited ability to maintain space
- 4 to 6 months of retention
types of resorb barrier mem and resorb time frames
synthetic resorb barrier mem, made of?
- Degradation by?
- rate of membrane resorption?
Synthetic: poly(lactic) and poly(glycolic) acid copolymers
- Degradation by hydrolysis
- Highly variable rate of membrane resorption (pH & material composition)
types f synthetic resorb barrier mem
available bone augmentation procedures
GBR
onlay block graft
what is GBR
ingrowth of
osteogenic cells
while preventing
migration of
unwanted cells
GTR
GTR = Regeneration of periodontal apparatus
Regeneration of alveolar bone, PDL, & cementum
GTR vs GBR
GTR = Periodontal regeneration ( to SAVE teeth !)
Same principle: exclusion of gingival connective tissue cells
from the wound and prevention of epithelial downgrowth.
These procedures allow cells with regenerative potential
(periodontal ligament [PDL], bone cells, and possibly
cementoblasts) entry into the wound site first.”
GBR = Bone regeneration ( to PLACE implants !)
tenting screws with ti mesh
ti enforced mem
type of max sinus bone graft placement procedures
lateral window or intracrestal
Lateral Window Sinus Lift procedure indication
- Less than 4 mm native maxillary alveolar bone
Intracrestal Sinus Lift indication
- More than 4mm native maxillary alveolar bone
lat sinus lift visualized
what technique
distraction osteogenesis
summer technique
Indications: bone types/height?
Results:
sub-sinus bone height? elevation? how much elevation without mucosal impairment is possible?
variatrion of basic sinus floor elevation
Indication:
* Type III or IV bone
* Minimum bone height of 5mm
Results:
* ↑initial sub-sinus bone height, ↑ elevation
* 4-6mm elevation w/o impairing mucosa is possible
balloon mod for sinus lift
Catheter filled with saline
Swelling the balloon
push out sinus membrane
histo?
limiting factor of modified sinus lift
Membrane can support elevation in the sinus cavity of 4-8mm
avantages of modified sinus lifts
invasive?
surgical staging?
graft?
complications?
Septum?
Minimally Invasive
Usually single surgery
Little or no graft needed¹
Less postoperative complication
Septum Presence
disdavntages of mod sinus lifts:
* lack of?
* limited elevation?
* uncertainty of?
Lack of direct visual control
Elevation height may be limited to 1-2mm
Uncertainty of microperforation of Schneiderian membrane
firts steps to summer technique
access?
bone?
Apical Deformation of ?
Crestal Access
Compacting bone
* Laterally & apically
Apical Deformation of sinus floor
second step to summers
Bone graft placed at osteotomy site
* Serve as damper during floor fracture
* Gradual ↑pressure leads to lifting of sinus membrane
what is done once summer is completed
place implant
how much can be lifted?
types of grafts
atuogenous
allograft
xenograft
no graft
graft complications
Infection
sinus status?
Fistula?
Lack of?
increase?
Perforation?
Infection
Pain, sinusitis
Hemosinus
Fistula
Lack of Primary stability
increases membrane lesion if lifted >5mm
Perforation of membrane
Reiser et al membrane perforations
* ≤2mm (small): prognosis, shape?
* ≥ 2mm (+implant exposed to sinus): prediction, shape?
- ≤2mm (small)
Good prognosis
Membrane retains dome shape - ≥ 2mm (+implant exposed to sinus)
Difficult to predict
Lack of shape and loss of space
Pikos mem perf
* 5-10mm
what used to close?
* >10mm
mem?
Pikos
* 5-10mm
Collagen membrane to close the tear
* >10mm
Cross-linked type I collagen membrane
Kasabah et al
* Large Perforation
Absolute Contraindication to?
Foreign bodies create?
Absolute Contraindication to continuation of surgery!
Foreign bodies create pathologies of mucos
Osteotomes in low-density bone
* Compression wil?
* improves?
Osteotomes can enhance primary stability in low-
density bone
* Compression will laterally condense bone¹
* Denser interface improve initial bone-to-implant contact²
residual ridge size and perforations
Residual ridge of 3mm Perforation=85%³
Residual ridge of 6mm Perforation=25%
* Risk factor for perforation do correlate with residual ridge height
predictable results with mod sinus liftwith initial bone height?
Predictable result may be correlated to
* Initial residual bone height of 4-6mm
invasiveness of modded sinus lift
Less invasive than lateral approach sinus lift
mem tear occurance in mod sinus lift
* Small size defect:
* Osteotomy -sized defect:
Infrequent occurrence of membrane tears
* Adequate bone graft mass elevating the membrane
* Small size defect: good prognosis
* Osteotomy -sized defect: discontinue implant surgery
Successful creation of sub-antral space
- Gentle tissue manipulation / accurate pre op x-ray
- May need little or no graft with implant insertion
Ridge Expansion Technique
where?
results?
Dental implant placed where?
Additional space filled with?
Longitudinal Osteotomy on Alveolar bone
Lateral reposition of buccal cortex
Resulted in ↑alveolar width
Dental implant placed between buccal and lingual cortex
Additional space filled with bone graft materials.
where is ridge expansion more commonly performed? why?
More common performed on Maxilla > Mandible
Thinner cortical plate
Softer medullary bone
ridge expansion technique forms
immeadiate and delayed
Techniques are Location / Bone type based!
Immediate Ridge Split (Single Stage)
which arch?
why?
Maxilla
Thinner cortical plate
Softer medullary bone
Delayed Ridge Split (2 Stage) used in which arch? why?
Mandible
Lower flexibility
Thicker cortical plate
Risk of mal-fracture
Limiting Factors of ridge expansion:
Minimum alveolar ridge width:
width around implant necessary? which regions?
Minimum alveolar ridge width: 2-4mm ( prefer ≥3mm)
1mm width around implant is necessary: Buccal and palatal region
ridge expansion
implant placement?
treatment time?
cost?
Barrier membrane?
Simultaneous implant placement
Reduced treatment time
Reduced cost of surgery
Barrier membrane usually not
needed
d
disadvantages of ridge expansion:
Bone?
Difficult on?
Cannot Correct?
Only ↑’s?
Implant placed tends to situated where? why?
Bone loss
Difficult on single tooth site
Cannot Correct Vertical defect
Only ↑alveolar width
Implant placed tends to situated facially¹ due to remodeling and resportion of buccal plate
immeadiate ridge split steps
delayed ridge split steps
Summary of ridge splits
Immediate ridge split: excellent result in?
Delayed ridge split: where?
Expected width gain?
better arch? why?
Immediate ridge split: Excellent implant osseointegration result
Delayed ridge split: Consideration for mandible
Expected width gain: ~3mm or more
Maxilla is more applicable: Due to bone type (3 or 4)
Grafting Treatment Planning
Success rate of?
Major bone grafting can have a failure
rate as high as?
Immediate loading?
staged?
Success rate of 90% or greater*
Major bone grafting can have a failure rate as high as 30%
Immediate loading is not recommended
Two-stage delayed loading protocol needed
when zygomatic implants would be used diagrammed
Various Options for Maxillary Rehab
Zygoma Implant
Indications for Zygoma Implant
Sufficient anterior bone + severely resorbed posterior 1
Insufficient anterior bone (need ant graft) + severely resorbed posterior
Partial Edentulous Maxilla with unilateral or bilateral loss
of posterior teeth + severe resorption
Zygoma implant + Minimum of 2 regular implant
Consideration for Zygoma Implant
sinuses?
radio?
Traditional use of zygoma implants dictates room for?
Consideration for Zygoma Implant
Clinically symptom free and pathology free sinuses
Proper radiographic imaging for maxillofacial
region
Traditional use of zygoma implants dictates room for at least TWO conventional implants at anterior maxilla
Prosthetic Consideration of zygo implants
Surgical Anatomical Consideration of zygo implants
Usually at?
Slightly?
Confirm?
Head position will dictate?
Usually at premolar region
Slightly more palatal
Confirm implant head position
Head position will dictate future abutment screw position
Concept of AP-Spread for zygo implants
loading time frames
Surgical considerations for implant loading
Consider taper implant for?
Final torque >
ISQ value >
Consider taper implant for increased initial implant stability
Final torque >35Ncm
ISQ value >60
restorative considerations for implant loading
Minimum handling during?
what should be eliminated
Occlusal contacts?
cateilver in immeadiate?
Consider final abutment?
Minimum handling during healing phase
Load Distribution, cantilever / lateral forces eliminated
Occlusal contact at first 2-3 months
No cantilever of all types in immediate function protocol
Consider final abutment at time of implant placement
Pre-operative Radiographic Exam
Recommended Radiographs?
Panorex:
Intraoral PA:
Lateral Cephalometric:
CT:
Panorex: Anatomic structure and pathology detection
Intraoral PA: supplement Panorex
Lateral Cephalometric: Sagittal relationship of jaws
CT: Bone volume (width and height) assessment
Contraindications of zygo implants
sinus?
pathology of?
Underlying?
Relative contraindications?
Acute sinus infection
Maxillary or zygoma pathology
Underlying uncontrolled systemic disease
Relative contraindications
chronic infectious sinusitis
bisphosphonates
smoking
Extra-Sinus Approach
Some European clinicians are placing zygoma implant using extra-
sinus approach and claimed to have no problem