ADHD Flashcards
Problems when it comes to researching ADHD
- have to be careful!
- a lot of talk about it in the media, especially when it comes to medicating children
- potential side effects
- the ‘label’ of ADHD
- big debate as to whether it is a real disorder or not?
Wang et al (2016) - negative media publicity
- background
- impact of negative publicity on ADHD disorder medication in Taiwan
- explored trends in ADHD medication between 2000-2011 and whether negative media coverage of Ritalin in Jan 2010 impacted prescriptions throughout the country
Media story - Ritalin = ‘children’s cocaine’
- reported the many adverse side effects causing panic among children diagnosed with ADHD and their parents
Wanted to see if this had a nationwide effect
Wang et al (2016) - negative media publicity
- results
Compared with ADHD P’s first diagnosed before the negative media coverage, ADHD P’s first diagnosed after the negative media coverage were less likely to be prescribed medication to manage their ADHD
- SO the negative coverage did affect stimulant prescriptions for ADHD throughout Taiwan
- parents - less willing to let their kids receive stimulant treatments?
- physicians - also starting to question the safety claims of stimulants so became more reluctant to prescribe them?
ADHD - a real disorder or not?
Big debate over whether it is a real disorder or not
- is this because of the growing number of medicated children for the disorder
- is it a real disorder or are children just behaving according to their age?
Barkley et al (2002) - ADHD is a real disorder
- consortium of 70 ADHD researchers
- concerned about the inaccurate portrayal of ADHD in media reports may be causing P’s to not seek treatment as well as promoting a poor public perception
- ALL of the major medical associations and governmental health agencies recognise ADHD as a genuine disorder because the scientific evidence indicating it is so overwhelming
- state that there is SO much evidence on the behavioural inhibition and sustained attention, impairments in major life activities as well as neurological studies showing differences in brain activities/areas
ADHD - a real disorder?
- evidence from growing links with neurological and genetic components
- evidence of behavioural patterns worldwide
- this is something! –> not just an inconvenience!!!!!
ADHD - Prevalence
- UK - affects approximately 4% of children
- these rates differ internationally - between 1-20%
- 40% of children with ADHD continue to meet the diagnostic criteria into adulthood!
(people initially thought you would just grow out of the disorder!) - 65% of children with ADHD have one or more co-morbid conditions
- significant discussions around gender:
> boys are diagnosed more than girls!
> adults - more tolerant to girls hyperactivity
> diagnostic criteria - how we interpret and measure girls and boys behaviour? - there are key different in how we interpret behaviour
- are girls misdiagnosed as a result?!?!?!?
Polancyzk et al (2014) - Prevalence of ADHD
- found that estimates of ADHD prevalence are significantly variable
Geographical location and year of study - not associated with variability of prevalence estimates!
Variability was instead accounted for by:
- methodological characteristics of studies, specifically diagnostic criteria used, source of information and requirement of impairment of diagnosis
Examined studies from the past 3 decades
- no evidence suggesting that there was an increase in the number of children in the population who meet criteria for ADHD when standardised diagnostic procedures are followed
ADHD - defining difficulties?
There are differences between the classification criteria:
- DSM V - over diagnosing; ICD-10 - under diagnosing
Key differences between self-reports and parents reports
Child needs to demonstrate the behaviours across contexts
Difference between teacher’s reports based on the child’s ethnicity
- making assumptions about cultures?
> Could we be making assumptions about genders too?
ADHD - differences between parents reports?
Fathers - maybe reporting fewer problems - WHY?
Mothers - maybe spending more time due to father’s work commitments OR is it just the way that females view/regard the behaviour?
Demonstrating the behaviour across contexts:
- normally the mother who comes out of employment to look after the child!
- SO mother gets 24/7 of the ADHD child, father doesn’t get as much
DSM-IV to DSM-V - changes?
- same 18 symptoms divided into the 2 domains - Inattention and Hyperactivity/Impulsivity
- diagnosis - need at least 6 symptoms in one domain
KEY change - changes to reflect adult experiences!
DSM-V - ADHD
Now appropriate for adults!
DSM-IV - devised mainly on childhood samples
- not really valid then diagnosing pre-schoolers and adults with the same measures - quite a difference!
- Farone (2000) - DSM-IV is developmentally insensitive
- children and young adults - learn to control their symptoms and have freedom to choose non-constructive environments
Getting older:
- lots of ADHD begins/becomes apparent when children are put in structures like pre-school etc
- only really / it is easier to see when the child is put in an environment which demands some form of order?
- then we can see the ADHD emerge?
ADHD - Adulthood
Adult ADHD - many of the same characteristics
BUT now it is in adults contexts - work, love etc
- same patterns but developmentally appropriate contexts
- life span disorder, not a childhood disorder!
- same neuropathology as childhood ADHD
- also has similar responses to drug treatments!
Changes in criteria from DSM-IV to DSM-V….
- examples have been added to help with the application across the lifespan
- cross-situational requirement - has been strengthened to “several” symptoms in each setting
- onset criterion has been changed from “symptoms…present before age 7 years” to “symptoms were present prior to age 12”
- hyperactive earlier onset; inattention later onset
- co-morbid diagnosis with autism spectrum disorder - now allowed!
- symptom threshold changes has been made for adults, with the cut off for ADHD of 5 symptoms instead of 6 which is required of younger persons
Some criticisms of DSM-IV - Inattention and Hyperactivity-Impulsivity
Inattention and Hyperactivity-Impulsivity
- separate elements within a complex disorder
- OR are they arbitrarily divided elements of a continuous-trait dimension
> the current subtype structure addresses neither position!
Some criticisms of DSM-IV - existence of subtype entities….
Implies that they exist!
- HOWEVER there is little empirical evidence to support their differentiation as classified
Some criticisms of DSM-IV - manifestation of adult ADHD
Not well represented in the criteria!
Some criticisms of DSM-IV - criteria themselves
Vaguely described!
- this enhances criterion variance
- this is a significant problem in everyday use
Some criticisms of DSM-IV - 6 month time span
- too short - particularly for young children!
- school attention problems may be transient
- 12 months would be more appropriate time
- gives a bit longer to assess
- may just be that children need to settle
Issues affecting diagnosis fo ADHD - children’s abilities to sustain and control impulses
More problematic:
- later in the day
- with more complex tasks
- when behavioural restraint is required
- when levels of stimulation are low
- where there is a deal in feedback / reward
- when there is an absence of adult supervision
- when the task requires persistence