Accelerated Development Flashcards

1
Q

Accelerated Development - as a research area…

A
  • not had as much attention as other areas of atypical

England - ‘gifted’ and ‘talented’

  • registers both - attracting funding?
  • schools are encouraged to identify children that are gifted and talented –> intellect, arts and sport
  • developing guidelines for teaching gifted and talented children

> giving a label - people can give support?
problem - reserv lists - what if you aren’t in the top 5?
what is the effect of this?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Accelerated Development - not as much of a easy ride as people think?

A

IT IS just as challenging and difficult when you are above your peers academically

  • not the same intellectual level - problems socially and emotionally?
  • may not want to interact if you aren’t on the same level
  • we normally choose friends who are on similar levels
  • potential serious problems in childhood - bullying, isolation etc
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

History of Intelligence testing

- Darwin

A
  • theory of evolution

- individuals of a species differ from each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

History of Intelligence testing

- Galton

A
  • looking at Darwin’s work
  • if this applies to animals, how does it apply to humans?
  • most intelligent humans - naturally rise to the top?
  • positions achieved in society due to our intelligence levels?
  • intelligence - inbuilt / innate features
  • discovered that talent ran in families
  • devised and distributed questionnaires
  • ran twin studies too - similarities found, supporting his belief in the influence of nature on intellect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

History of Intelligence testing

- Problems with Galton

A

Talent running in families

  • due to the opportunities people had instead?
  • finances to go and get educated?
  • the environment you are in mainly helping out for this rather than being purely innate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

History of Intelligence testing

- Binet

A
  • no pre-conceived definition of intelligence
  • challenge - psychological and educational
  • compulsory education in France - investigating this
  • using AGE - subnormal children could be defined in terms of how far they were behind in years
  • level that a child scored at - mental age
  • caveats to IQ testing
  • scores - not defining, used to detect mentally retarded children

Developing these tests to help people!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

History of Intelligence testing

- Terman

A
  • Stanford-Binet test
  • ignored caveats - can determine range of abilities
  • single numbers can represent the level of intelligence that an individual
  • IQ = mental age / chronological age x 100
  • amount of deviation from mean score = amount of advancement or delay in development

Assessing what they have rather than Binet’s original thought of what someone needs!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Terminology of Intelligence

A

Intelligence, IQ etc - all entered into everyday language

  • clever, retarded, dumb etc - commonly heard
  • issue of labelling again - can be used as insults? or praise? or attention-seeking?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

IQ ranges

A
120-110 - superior intelligence 
110-90 - normal or average intelligence 
90-80 - dullness 
80-70 - borderline deficiency 
69-50 - moron or defective 
49-20 - imbecile 
below 20 - idiot
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Defining intelligence - what is and is not…

A

HIGHLY debated topic!

  • what can be classified as ability
  • what isn’t classified as ability

Nature vs nurture debate - how much is genetics, how much is environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Defining Intelligence - different proposed ideas

A

G or S intelligence - Spearman
- general or specific intelligences for certain functions

Emotional intelligence
Multiple intelligences

Entity or incremental

  • over the lifespan or do we build it up over?
  • are we born with it all or do we develop it?

–> what is the impact of this in how we treat gifted and retarded children??

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Following up on gifted children

- Joan Freeman (2013)

A
  • follow-up study
  • LT effects of families and educational provision on gifted children
  • major difference - those labelled gifted had significantly more emotional problems than either of the matched control groups
  • by mid 40’s - high scholastic achievements had not reliably delivered outstanding life success
  • BUT - overall, the higher the intelligence, the more successful the individuals were likely to be as adults

Vital aspects of recognisable success, whether gifted or not –> hard work, emotional support and a positive personal outlook

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Correlations with perfectionism and high intellect

A
  • may disengage?
  • feel as if they don’t have to put the work in
  • ‘safety blanket’ of high intellect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Misconceptions about gifted children

- Eklund et al (2015)

A

Identifying emotional and behaviour risk among gifted and non-gifted children

Significant differences found:

  • parents and teachers identified a higher number of boys and non-gifted children at risk
  • children demonstrating emotional and behaviour risk - gifted demonstrated elevated internalising behaviour
  • suggestion - higher cognitive abilities may be a protective factor –> gifted children demonstrated higher academic performance regardless of risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Misconceptions about gifted children

- Eklund et al (2015) - AFTER THOUGHTS

A
  • doesn’t quite corroborate with what we would have thought….
  • BUT - it does sow that there are similarities between gifted and non-gifted children - DO WE REALLY NEED TO KEEP DIFFERENTIATING BETWEEN THE TWO?

Childhood behaviour is so complex

  • inter-rater differences found here
  • continual need for multiple informants of childhood behaviours!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Misconceptions about gifted children

- Schectman and Silektor (2012)

A

Israeli study - compared the social and emotional difficulties of gifted children in comparison to non-gifted children

Gifted:

  • higher on - need fulfilment, empathy, academic self-concept and lack of emotional anxiety
  • lower on - self-disclosure and physical self-concept
  • most variables - scored similarly
  • need fulfilment - linked to loneliness
  • gifted children - not very different from non-gifted
  • still some differences on BOTH sides but nothing major pulling the 2 groups away from each other
  • specifics that need to be worked on which is the same for most groups studied!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Asynchronous development…

A
  • hallmark of highly able children
  • uneven standards of intellectual, physical and emotional maturity
  • e.g - child may have the intellectual ability of a 10 year old but the emotional maturity of a 6 year old
  • unfair advantage sometimes?
    > intellectual advantage but may not have the same emotional maturity!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Identification

A
  • ability is not always easy to spot
  • revolving door of opportunity?
    > need to constantly provide opportunities
    > has to be wide and diverse
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

US - Specific streams for gifted and talented children

- for example, Ohio

A
  • all public schools are required to identify gifted students in kindergarten through to the 12the grade
  • superior cognitive ability - 2SDs above the mean or above 95th percentile
  • specific academic ability in a field - performing in the 95th percentile
  • creative thinking ability - scores 1SD above above the means
  • visual or performing arts ability - demonstrating to a trained individual
20
Q

Standardised Tests available

A
Cognitive Abilities Test 
Woodcock-Johnson-III (WJIII) 
Weschler-Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV) 
ACT test, Scholastic Aptitude test
EXPLORE test
21
Q

What IQ score from standardised test qualifies a student for gifted services?

A

130-140

22
Q

National Association for Gifted Children - USA

- tests and assessments

A

Common assessment tools for identification BUT SHOULD NOT SERVE as the sole source of information!

  • tests - often exclude certain groups - English Language Learners (ELLs), disabled or from low-income backgrounds
  • multiple assessments (both objective and subjective( - best way to ensure that no gifted learned is overlooked!
23
Q

Challenges that testing brings…

- Card & Giuliano (2015)

A

Longstanding concern about gifted education in the US in the under-representation of minorities and economically disadvantaged groups

Standard process - based on referrals from parents and teachers

  • what about children who don’t have the same opportunities / access to this (money!)
  • may be equally as gifted but just not have the access

Introduce a universal screening programme?
- led to large increases in the fractions of economically disadvantaged and minority students placed in gifted programs

–> parents and teachers often fail to recognise the potential of poor and minority students and those with limited English proficiency

24
Q

Challenges that testing brings…

- Grantham & Ford

A

Case study of Danisha - qualitative report

  • 15 year old, African-American female 9th grader
  • from minority background
  • immediately started underachieving - felt disconnected from her own community and the one she was trying to join!

SHOWS:

  • we should just identify and put into programmes
  • we need to help people transition/settle into them!
25
Q

Challenges that testing brings…

- Merrotshy (2013)

A

Study of gifted child with cerebral palsy
- CP - difficult barriers to the recognition of high natural ability and to the development of this ability into high achievement

  • trying to determine ways of assessing high cognitive ability in a child with CP and to explore ways of using technology to support her learning needs
  • action research methodology - writing tools implemented
  • marked increase in the quantity and quality of the child’s sort writing
  • -> free from tiredness and frustration THEREFORE more time to think and reflect on what was being written
  • sophisticated use of language
26
Q

What makes a brain gifted?

- Jensen

A

MORPHOLOGY
- size, quantity and shape of structures

OPERATIONS
- neural efficiency and speed of internal connectivity in the brain

REAL-ESTATE
- strategic differences in which or how many brain areas are used

ELETRO-CHEMICAL CELLULAR FUNCTIONS
- differences in electrical and chemical activity

27
Q

Brains of gifted learners…

A
  • greater focus skills - frontal lobe function
  • greater global connectivity - more overall brain usage
  • greater alpha brainwave pattern - supports concentration and input
  • better brain chemistry balance - supports attention, mood and memory
28
Q

Fixed / Growth Intelligence

A

Fixed mindset - intelligence is a fixed trait

Growth mindset - intelligence is a malleable quality; a potential that can be developed

29
Q

Fixed / Growth Intelligence

- Blackwell et al (2007)

A

Explored the role of implicit theories of intelligence in adolescent’s mathematics achievement

30
Q

Fixed / Growth Intelligence

- Blackwell et al (2007) - STUDY 1

A
  • belief that intelligence is malleable - incremental theory –> predicted an upward trajectory in grades
  • belief that intelligence is fixed - entity theory –> predicted a flat trajectory
31
Q

Fixed / Growth Intelligence

- Blackwell et al (2007) - STUDY 2

A
  • tested learning goals, beliefs about effort, causal attributions and strategies
  • incremental theory intervention - promoted a positive change in classroom motivation compared with a control group
32
Q

Assessing National Need

- Stack and Sutherland (2008)

A

National Census in Scotland

  • including all publicly funded schools in Scotland
  • all statistics on the number of pupils deemed to require additional support for learning
  • also statistics for highly able students

Anomalies in some of the statistics?

  • no highly able pulls reported in some local education authorities
  • unexpected changes in numbers across years (e.g. Perth - 0 in 29, 21 in 2010)
  • total numbers reported across Scotland are low
33
Q

Renzulli - Three Rings Model

A

Intelligence - interaction among 3 basic clusters of human traits - general ability, task commitment and creativity

More able students - are capable of developing these traits and then applying them to any area of human performance

  • above average ability, creativity and task commitment
  • Renzulli - giftedness occurs when P’s are motivated to creatively apply their above-average ability

Above average performance in all 3 areas would lead to the identification of some being more able within this model!

34
Q

Renzulli - Three Rings Model

- intelligence - multifaceted?

A
  • recognised that intelligence was (to some degree( multifaceted
  • included both creativity and socio-affective elements in the theory
  • BUT still placed them alongside the more cognitively defined ‘g’
35
Q

Renzulli - Three Rings Model

- individual vs environment…

A
  • personality and environmental factors create contexts for the 3 rings to develop
  • co-cogntivie factors help develop social and intellectual capital
    > optimism, courage, sensitivity to human concerns etc
36
Q

Renzulli - Three Rings Model

- possible limitation

A
  • more able students - may be de-motivated by inappropriate / insufficient challenges
  • not being motivated by their work
  • difficulties identifying task commitment within a school setting
37
Q

Gagne - Differentiated model of giftedness and talent

A

Individuals - have natural abilities
- turn into talents through a developmental process of learning, training and practising

  • natural abilities
  • environmental, interpersonal - CHANCE!
  • developmental process
  • competencies developed
38
Q

Appropriate challenge required

A

Higher intellectual level - SO they need to be given appropriate challenges
- so they can develop, they need to be intellectually simulated too!

Need to get this right
- if we don’t have the appropriate challenge, then they are going to miss out!

39
Q

Betts and Neimark (1988)

- Profiles of exceptionally able students

A
The Successful's 
The Creative 
The Undergrounds 
The Dropouts / At Risk 
The Double-Labelled 
 The Autonomous Learner
40
Q

Betts and Neimark (1988) - Sucessful’s

A
  • learnt the system
  • little authority and creativity
  • failure challenges identity
  • pefectionist
  • non risk-taking
41
Q

Betts and Neimark (1988) - Creative

A
  • typically possess a high degree of creativity

- may appear to be obstinate, tactless or sarcastic

42
Q

Betts and Neimark (1988) - Undergrounds

A
  • deny their talent in order to feel more included with a non-gifted peer group
43
Q

Betts and Neimark (1988) - Drop outs / At risk

A
  • frequently exceptionally able students who were identified very late, perhaps not until late post-primary
44
Q

Betts and Neimark (1988) - Double-Labelled

A
  • exceptionally able children who have a physical, an emotional or a learning disability
45
Q

Betts and Neimark (1988) - Autonomous

A
  • able children who have learnt to make the system work for them
  • independent, takes risks
46
Q

Double Exceptionality / Twice Exceptionality

A
  • refers to intellectually gifted children who have some form of disability
  • these children are considered exceptional both because of their intellectual gifts and because of their special needs