Additional Flashcards
Steps in pricing and design
- assimilate marketing information
- determine assumptions
- determine appropriate model points
- perform profit-test
- perform model office projections
- consider the risks
- amend the structure
List the items that an insurer will need to choose a methodology and basis for in order to calculate EV
A methodology is required to
- value the assets
- value the liabilities
A basis is required for the following items in order to calculate the PV of future profits
- investment returns earned on reserves
- mortality
- expenses
- expense inflation
- surrender rates
- rates of conversion to paid-up
- risk discount rate
a basis is also required to value the liabilities
Financial strength
refers to a company’s ability to:
- withstand adverse changes in experience
- fulfil its new business plans
- meet policyholders’ expectations
Conditions for actuarial funding & constraints on its use
- high fund management charges should be available on at least some of the units
- after actuarial funding, the residual regular non-unit cashflows should remain positive in all future years when projected on a prudent basis
- this usually means that not all future fund management charges can be actuarially funded
- an appropriate unit surrender penalty should be in place, such that the surrender value cannot be greater than the actuarially funded unit reserve value at surrender
- there may be statutory constraints
Determining the risk margin using the cost of capital approach
pg.1280
Principles a life insurance company should follow when establishing supervisory reserves
- the reserves should cover all liabilities arising from the contract
- the reserves should be calculated prudently, allowing for all relevant liabilities
- the reserves should take credit for future premiums if these are contractually due to be paid
- the valuation should be prudent and so the basis should contain margins
- the valuation of the liabilities should be consistent with that of the assets
- appropriate approximations or generalisations may be allowed
- the interest rate used for calculating reserves must be chosen prudently, taking into account the currencies, yields and reinvestment yields on assets
- the demographic, withdrawal and expense assumptions used should all be prudent, taking into account the type of insurance and country of residence but the expenses can be on an ongoing business basis
- if no explicit allowance is made for future bonuses, then they must be allowed for implicitly by a suitable adjustment to the valuation interest rate
- if the valuation method itself defines the amount of expenses assumed, then the amount implied must be no less than a prudent estimate of the relevant expenses
- the valuation calculations conducted over time should not suffer discontinuities arising from arbitrary changes to basis
- however, the basis should be active and appropriate to current circumstances
- the valuation method should recognise the emergence of profit appropriately over the policies’ lifetimes, so as to match the assumed future regular bonus
- valuation bases and methods should be disclosed
Why is financial underwriting important?
- to make sure that the policyholder is not over-insured. over-insurance poses a moral hazard
- affordability
- selective lapsation
Practical problems faced in allocating actual investment returns to the asset share build up
- assets on WP and NP are likely to be combined. Decision needs to be made on how to allocate investment returns to areas of business and between tranches of business
- this may also be dependent on the appropriate asset mix of each of the tranches of business
- the actual investment return cannot always be directly observed. Some approximate method will need to be used to determine return on these assets e.g. use of indices
- available indices may not accurately reflect the actual underlying assets held
- the return allocated to asset share may be smoothed over time. The extent of smoothing is subjective
- investment returns should be net of tax
- need to allow for the accrual of tax on unrealised gains
- the actual investment return needs to be reduced by investment expenses. some approximations may be needed
- the data quality and detail necessary for calculation may not be available
- accurate calculations may only be done periodically. Some approximation is required for the intermediate terms
Principles when providing bonus recommendations to board
- PRE
- equity
- financial soundness of company
- availability of shareholder capital
- consistent with company’s investment strategy
- consistent with stated bonus philosophy
- competitive
- sustainable
- consistent with professional guidance/regulation
- tax
- business objectives/strategy
Internal unit-linked fund
An internal unit-linked fund:
- consists of a clearly identifiable set of assets e.g. equities
- is divided into a number of equal units consisting of identical subsets of the fund’s assets and liabilities
- the division is notional
Principal risks to insurer of setting unit prices
June 2012 Q5 ii
- unit prices are generally set at discrete points in time, whereas the values of the underlying assets effectively change continuously
- this is a particular risk if…
- the unit price calculation would include some approximations
- there could be errors in the actual unit price calculations
- regulations may restrict what policy charges, for example, may be included in the unit price
- negative market perception if violates equity principle
- impact of approximations/errors
Requirements for actuarial funding
- there must be a unit-related charge on the unit fund
- the charges that are not used for actuarial funding should be sufficient to cover the renewal expenses on the contract
- the face value of units should only be available on contingent events
- actuarial funding must be permitted by regulation
possible cross-subsidies
- old and young
- other known rating factors
- ill and healthy at entry
- policy size
- early and late withdrawals
Factors to consider in setting retention limit
- expected claims distribution & volatility
- expected volumes of business
- experience on other reinsurance
- the confidence and familiarity of the company in writing this business
- other products’ retention limits
- impact on regulatory capital requirements of different retention limits
- risk appetite of the company
- importance of stable free asset ratio
- free assets of the company
- price of reinsurance
- whether profit share is included
- impact of various retention levels on profitability and probability of insolvency
- the opinions of the reinsurer as they should have experience in this regard
Advantages of standardising claims criteria across the industry
- such standardization would have to be agreed by the various insurers, so the companies’ expertise would be pooled to come up with the best solution
- there will be a sharing of current and future expertise on the topic of medical advances, which will bring costs down for the various players in the market
- the standardized definitions are likely to be free of ambiguity
- this should lead to quicker claims settlement because there should be less room for dispute
- from a marketing perspective, standardized definitions could result in:
- easier comparison between different companies’ products
- improved explanation from salesforce
- better understanding by policyholders of the products
- possible improvement in sales
- standard definitions should make it easier to collect industry-wide data, which should lead to better information on which to base pricing
- these benefits also apply to reinsurers
Appropriateness of alteration basis
- PRE
- contribution to profit
- expenses
- boundary conditions
- lapse and re-entry risk
- small change in benefit
- frequency of changes
- ease of administering and communication
- competition
Four main factors that affect the capital requirements for a company
- contract design
- frequency of premium payment
- relationship between premium and supervisory reserving basis
- the level of initial expenses
Considerations when making a policy paid-up
- the basis needs to be such that the conversion to paid up is affordable and can be supported by the earned asset share
- should be consistent with the projected maturity value, allowing for premiums not received
- should be consistent with other alterations such as surrender values
- surrender value should be consistent before and after such alteration to avoid lapse and re-entry
- basis should result in a paid-up value that is consistent with any information disclosed at new business stage in line with PRE
- paid up rates offered by competitors should be considered
- basis and any changes should be documented clearly
- the calculation should be simple to understand
Proportionate method vs equating policy value method for paid-up
Nov 2010 pg.7
pg 781
Asset-enhancing reinsurance
- it may be used to unlock a portion of the value of the profitable in-force business or discounted cashflows on policies
- the VIF is the excess of the statutory reserves over the realistic reserves
- VIF will be released over time, but is currently an off-balance sheet, non-tangible asset
- in exchange for entering into a reinsurance contract on existing business, the reinsurer gives the insurer cash now
- this is paid back over the next few years from the future emergence of the VIF as future profits
Negative non-unit reserves (to reduce initial business strain)
- can be held for policy under which future charges are expected to be more than sufficient to meet future non-unit liabilities
- negative non-unit reserves thus reduce the total reserves required by taking advance credit for the EPV of these future positive cashflows
- the reserve represents a loan from other contracts which have positive non-unit reserves
- the loan will be repaid by the emerging future profits from the policy for which the negative non-unit reserve is held
Constraints of negative non-unit reserve
- may not be permissible under local legislation
- the sum of the unit and non-unit reserve for a policy should not be less than any guaranteed surrender value
- the future profits arising need to emerge in time to repay the loan
- after taking account of the future non-unit reserves, there should be no negative cashflows for the policy
- in aggregate, the sum of all non-unit reserves should not be negative
- the negative non-unit reserve should be determined prudently
Regulatory restrictions (besides on investments)
- restrictions on the type of contracts a life insurer can sell
- restrict the premium rates that can be used on some type of contracts
- requirements relating to the terms and conditions offered
- restrict the distribution channel:
- the channels through which the life insurance may be sold
- the procedure to be followed for a sale
- minimum qualifications requirements for the sales staff
- the information to be provided as part of the selling process
- remuneration rules - restrictions on the ability to:
- underwrite
- differentiate between classes of lives - constraints on the amount of business that can be written
- restrictions on permissible reinsurance
- requirements to TCF
Advantages of cashflow method over formula method to calculate reserves
Advantages
- the cashflow method allows for assumed experience to vary over time e.g. mortality improvements
- this allows a stochastic model to be built for deriving the distribution of reserve level and for valuation of options
- allows for withdrawal experience explicitly
- it allows more easily for complex benefit structures e.g. where charges and benefits depend on future assumptions such as unit-linked business
- the risk discount rate can take into account the term structure of interest rates
- tax can be allowed for more appropriately
- can more easily allow explicitly for future bonuses
Disadvantages of cashflow method over formula method to calculate reserves
- formula method is much easier and quicker to calculate
- formula method doesn’t require establishing complex and expensive models
- formula method requires fewer assumptions
Factors to consider when determining terminal bonus rate
- whether it will be affordable or negatively impact the solvency of the company
- set relative to difference between asset share and benefits guaranteed to date at policy maturity date
- bonus distribution should be fair to different categories and generations of policyholders
- insurer will want to smooth payouts to reduce the impact on policyholders of fluctuations in investment markets
- PRE
- insurer will need to comply with terms and conditions
- the affordability will be considered in light of future business plans and terminal rates declared by competitors
Gross premium valuation method for determining reserves
june 2015 Q2 ii
Approach to setting surrender values
June 2015 Q6i
Reasons for holding free assets
1.the main reason is to ensure that policyholder obligations are met even if future experience is worse than expected and actual liabilities higher than the current expected level
2. a minimum level will probably be required by the regulator
3. finance future new business strain
4. enable less reinsurance to be purchased
5. enable a less restrictive investment strategy to enhance expected returns
6. support management strategies e.g. business acquisition in specific areas or take advantage of other profitable opportunities as they present themselves
7. smooth dividend payments to shareholders
8. smooth surplus distribution and thus support policyholder expectations
9. provide confidence to shareholders, policyholders and brokers
10. improve credit ratings
Dynamic solvency testing
Dynamic solvency testing is a projection of the company’s revenue account and balance sheet for a specified future period
The projection could be done deterministically or stochastically. If deterministic, the projection basis should include possible adverse scenarios
Benefits of dynamic solvency testing
- to assess how well the company can withstand variations in both economic elements of experience as well as demographic adverse experience, which cannot be appreciated with a static solvency test
- the insurer is growing rapidly and will require significant capital to finance new business strain. DST will demonstrate whether there is a risk of insolvency given new business growth scenarios
- to assess the impact on solvency of any other decisions e.g. business acquisition, reinsurance changes and investment strategy
- depending on the type of product and level of guarantees being sold, the insurer can assess its risk of insolvency as a result of adverse experience on items being guaranteed
- DST will thus allow management to take corrective action before solvency deteriorates to an unacceptable level
Considerations for investment of free assets
- maximise return subject to risk appetite
- results of DST in combination with risk appetite
- finance new business strain
- nature, term and currency of liabilities and how well-matched they are
- excess above regulatory requirements
- size of free assets
- ethical investment restrictions
- policy expectations for smoothed bonuses
Advantages of UWP over WP to insurer
- can reduce new business strain under UWP through product design
- bring product offering more in line with that of competitors
- more acceptable to have reviewable charges
- more acceptable to have little (or no) guarantees
- easier to understand which could lead to more new business
- new PRE can be created by wording marketing material differently
Disadvantages of UWP over WP for insurer
- more expensive to administer
- product is similar in structure to unit-linked business which means there are more companies to compete against
- reversionary bonuses tend to have a higher cost of bonus in the early years
- this results in less deferral of surplus
Advantages of UWP over CWP for policyholders
- The UWP product is easier to understand due to:
- explicit charges
- bonus as a % of unit fund
- UWP product is generally more flexible e.g. can be converted to unit-linked
- UWP is arguably more equitable as companies tend to hold back less surplus
Disadvantages of UWP over CWP for policyholders
- less smoothing takes place as companies tend to hold back less surplus
- could lead to reduced return due to less deferral of surplus
- charges not guaranteed
- if claim early on policy, benefit generally lower than what it would have been under CWP
Market consistent approach to valuing liabilities
June 2016 Q6
Ways of allocation UWP bonuses
- the price of the unit remains fixed and the insurer allocates additional units to each contract at the bonus declaration. There could be a minimum bonus declaration of zero or some percentage
- the insurer changes the price of the units (usually on a daily basis). The increase is made up of the guaranteed part and a bonus part
Key differences between UWP and unit-linked contracts
- there is a difference in the way that the insurer determines the price of the units and therefore the benefit payable
- for unit-linked business, there is a direct link to a specified pool of assets, with the unit prices being adjusted as and when underlying asset values change
- with UWP business, bonuses are allocated to the UWP fund at the discretion of the insurer
- the key distinction is the discretion that the insurer has over the bonuses granted - for UWP, a terminal bonus could be added when the insured event occurs
- for unit-linked business, there is no terminal bonus when the insured event occurs as unit prices change when the underlying asset values change - For UWP, the insurer takes a longer-term view of investment returns and smooths the bonuses it allocated
- for both products, the surrender value will usually be the fund value
- however, for UWP, the insurer may decide to apply a MVA at its discretion on surrender - charges higher on AWP because of guaranteed minimum bonus of 0%
Describe how a cashflow model could be used to determine the value of the expected future
profit from the in-force UWP business.
Q2 iii June 2017
Give 8 examples of how the regulatory framework might limit what a provider wants to do in terms of investment
TECH SCAMS
1. types of assets the insurer can invest in
2. extent of mismatching
3. currency matching requirements
4. hold certain assets (prescribed assets e.g. invest a minimum proportion of assets in specific types of investments)
5. single counterparty maximum exposure
6. custodianship of assets (regulations might require independent custodians)
7. amount that can be invested in particular assets
8. mismatching reserve
9. solvency: assets that can be included for the purpose of demonstrating solvency/solvency capital may have to be invested in specific assets
Modelling to determine investment strategy
- project asset and liability cashflows over defined period
- cashflows can be used to determine asset, liability and solvency values
- model points chosen to represent in-force business
- new business model points
- set assumptions
- choose which variables to model stochastically and which to model deterministically
- a starting investment strategy will be tested by performing a large number of projections and deriving a distribution of the solvency level at the end of the projection period. This will be achieved through a combo of stochastic simulations and deterministic sensitivity tests
- alternative investment strategies will also be tested
- the optimal investment strategy is the one that meets the insurer’s risk-return preference
Factors affecting marketability
- with profit
- benefit design and definition
- premiums and charges
- distribution
- underwriting requirements and entry restrictions
- simplicity
- reputation & uncertainty for policyholders
Factors to consider choosing between reinsurers
- price, profit sharing, reinsurance commission
- experience & technical assistance
- credit rating
- treaty conditions
- current relationship
- financial reinsurance
- cost of solvency requirements
Needs met by IP
- IP provides portion of income when policyholder becomes unable to work
- maintain standard of living for those on disability and state benefits usually insufficient
- used to service loans
- used to pay other insurance premiums
- used to protect the partnership by replacing income lost due to incapacity of one of the partners
Reasons for analysis of EV profits
NERDVPM
0. show financial effect of writing new business
1. reconcile values for successive years
2. data for use in executive remuneration schemes
3. validate data, calculations and assumptions used
4. show financial effect of deviations between best estimate assumptions and actual experience
5. provide detailed information for publication of company’s accounts
6. provide management information
Advantages of contribution method for policyholders
- the bonus is received earlier than on the insured event
- less subjective decisions which protects the policyholder against ungenerous companies
- the bonus may appear fairer
- may be tax advantages depending on how cash dividends are taxed vs final payout
Disadvantages of contribution method for policyholders
- the returns may be reduced due to the non-deferral of surplus
- reinvestment risk for the policyholder