Adaptibar Flashcards
Defenses to Strict Products Liability:
1) Assumption of the Risk
2) Misuse
Strict Liability in Tort
Strict Products Liability
Inadequate/Failure to Warn:
A type of Defective Product under Strict Products Liability
Commercial Seller:
In the business of selling the product
Strict Products Liability:
1) Defective product
2) Sold by commercial seller
3) Foreseeable user
4) Used in manner it was intended
Fitness for a Particular Purpose:
• Product only works for particular purpose
Examples:
o Hurricane windows can withstand certain wind
speeds
o Tires can only withstand speed up to a certain
mph
o Phone can only make so many phone calls
Merchantability:
Product acted as it should
Products Liability – Breach of Warranty:
Promise about product performance
Products Liability – Negligence:
Negligence in the chain caused the product to break or not work
Product Liability:
• A product breaks or doesn’t work properly • 3 Causes of Action
Negligence
Breach of warranty Strict products liability
Assumption of the Risk:
- Defense to Strict Liability
- Knew & Appreciated the risk
Abnormally Dangerous Activity:
Excavation
• Dynamite
• Toxic Chemicals
Strict Liability:
1) Possession of Wild Animals
2) Abnormally Dangerous Activities
Possession of Wild Animals:
Non-domesticated animals
• Injury that would normally occur
• Domestic animals with dangerous
propensities
Examples:
Wild animals:
o Lions, tigers, and bears Not Wild animals:
o Dogs and cats
Most warranty questions will test
on express warranties
Subject-Matter Jurisdiction:
1) Diversity of Citizenship 2) Federal Question
Amount in Controversy:
- Must be in excess of $75K
- Court must have “legal certainty”
Adding Claims:
• Plaintiff can ADD claims if one exceeds $75K
• Single Plaintiff can ADD claims against Single
Defendant to reach $75K
Dismissal for Improper Venue:
If the more convenient forum is a foreign country
Transfer by Consent:
Both parties must consent
Transfer of Venue – Improper Venue:
1) Judge must dismiss OR transfer in the interest of justice
2) Transfer to any district where the case could have originally been brought
Transfer of Venue – Proper Venue:
1) Court may TRANSFER to another district
2) For the convenience of parties & interest of
justice
3) Law of original venue will apply
Venue is based on where _ resides.
DEFENDANT
Venue – Corporations:
1) Principal place of business
2) Any district in state of incorporation
Proper Venue:
1) Where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in same state
2) Where substantial part of events took place
ONLY IF 1 & 2 DON’T APPLY:
3) Where there is Personal Jurisdiction over defendant
Definition – Venue
The proper Federal District Court for the case
Remand – Timing:
Within 30 DAYS of filing of Notice of Removal
• Defendant has burden to show Removal was
proper
Definition – Remand
Plaintiff wants to bring case back to State Court after improper Removal
Multiple Claims:
• If one claim is removable, then the entire case can be removed
Diversity Cases:
1) Case cannot be removed more than 1 year after start
2) Defendant cannot remove if he is a citizen of forum state
Removal – Timing:
• Filed within 30 DAYS of service of Complaint
Who Can Remove:
1) Only DEFENDANT may remove 2) ALL defendants must agree
Removal is not allowed for
state agencies
Definition – Removal
When a State Court case could have originally been brought in Federal Court
Service of Process – Corporations:
1) Officer or Designated Agent
2) Anyone of sufficiently high placement
Examples:
Not high placement
o Intern
o Guy in mail room Sufficiently high placement
o Vice President
o Registered Agent o CEO Emeritus
Out-of-State Service of Process:
1) Mail
2) Newspaper if no other reasonable way
Proper Ways to Serve Process:
1) Personal Service by non-party over 18 2) At Home with person of suitable age 3) First Class Mail
4) Authorized Agent
5) State Law Methods
Remember, don’t get stung by A WASP A - Abode
W - Waiver
A - Agent
S - State method
P - Personal service
Service of Process & Notice:
• Method must give adequate NOTICE
100 Mile Bulge Rule:
1) Out-of-state service allowed within 100 mile radius
2) Only for out-of-state 3rd party defendants/indispensable parties
Service of Process:
1) Only in the state where district court sits OR 2) Anywhere allowed by long-arm statute
Quasi in rem Jurisdiction:
• Going after property to satisfy a judgment against an individual
Example:
o Trying to get judgement from Jon by getting his boat
In rem Jurisdiction:
• Jurisdiction over an object/property
Minimum Contacts – Corporations:
- Purposeful Availment
- Systematic & Continuous Activities
Minimum Contacts Standard:
1) Suit does not offend traditional notions of Fair Play & Justice
2) Defendant could Reasonably Anticipate litigation
Long-Arm Statute:
• Gives courts the power to reach out-of-state persons
If you are in the state for a different proceeding or because of fraud, the court will
not be able to get personal jurisdiction
Definition – Personal Jurisdiction:
• In personem
• Ability to bring the individual into court
General Rules:
1) Present/ Personally Served 2) Domiciled
3) Consent
Supplemental Jurisdiction & Discretion:
Court has DISCRETION to apply
Supplemental Jurisdiction
If defendant is trying to add,
If the plaintiff is trying to add,
AdaptiTip
• If defendant is trying to add, generally ok
• If the plaintiff is trying to add, generally not ok
Supplemental Jurisdiction – NOT Allowed:
1) Original Plaintiff vs. 3rd Party Defendant 2) Compulsory Joinder
3) Joinder of Defendants
4) Intervention
Supplemental Jurisdiction – Allowed:
1) Compulsory Counterclaim
2) Joinder in Compulsory Counterclaim 3) Cross-claim
4) Impleader of 3rd Party Defendants
Diversity Cases:
• New party cannot destroy diversity of citizenship
May add claims without subject-matter jurisdiction if they arise from
a “common nucleus of facts”
Federal Question Cases:
1) Admiralty
2) Maritime
3) Intellectual Property
Federal Issue as a defense is NOT
a federal question
Federal Question:
1) Plaintiff’s claim must be based on federal law 2) Well-Pleaded Complaint Rule: Federal issue
must be obvious
Joining Parties:
• CANNOT join a party just to obtain Diversity
Foreign Citizens:
• US Citizen + Foreign Citizen = Diversity • Two Foreign Citizens = NO Diversity
Class Action:
One named member must meet $75K
Multiple Plaintiffs (SMJ 75k requirements)
- If Single Plaintiff meets $75K then other plaintiffs can join
- Cannot join if no Single Claim exceeds $75K