Accountant Liability- Section 10 Flashcards
Foreseen party
A third party or a member of limited class that the accountant knew would be relying on the financial statements for a limited transaction. Accountant is liable to foreseen parties for negligence
Foreseeable parties
Any party the accountant could reasonably foresee would receive financial statements and use them. The accountant is not usually liable for negligence to for seeable parties
C A M P S
Plaintive needs to prove camps or mile to win the case on negligence
Causal relationship: behavior of the accountant must be the proximate cause of the harm to the plaintive.
Absence of due care: performed audit in a careless manner
Material miss statement: the financial statements must have contained material miss statement or omissions
Privity or equivalent: plaintiff needs proper standing to sue for negligence
Duty of due care
State and federal statutes
Court decisions. Contract with the client. GAAS and gap GAAP. Customs of the profession
Fraud
Intent to deceive
Actual fraud making false statements with knowledge of there a fall city. Knowing there is a misstatement and making an opinion. Being bribed.
Constructive fraud: gross negligence – making false statements with a reckless disregard for truth, not knowing if the statements are true or false, opinion on statements that haven’t been audited
On exam assume ordinary negligence
R I M S
Plaintiff must Proof of rims or mile
Reliance- plaintiff must have relied on the financial statements
Intent to deceive – auditor must’ve had actual or constructive knowledge that their opinion was inappropriate
Material miss statement – the financial statements must’ve contained material miss statement or omissions
Suffered loss – plaintive must’ve suffered a financial loss
Fraud defenses
Not gross negligent followed GAAS
Not material
Good faith and no knowledge of falsity : auditor can claim lack of knowledge of false financial statements
Burden of proof is on the plaintive, exam questions in which all. Have not been established should be decided in favor of the auditor – defendant. Also note that punitive damages are not levied under common common law.
Privity
Needed for a cross negligence case. Privity need not apply any fraud case privity the fence wouldn’t be useful in a case even if it includes gross negligence