Accountant Liability Flashcards

1
Q

3 actions a CPA will be liable to a tax client for damages

A
  1. Failing to file return in timely manner
  2. Failing to advise client of certain elections
  3. Neglecting to evaluate joint or separate returns resulting in higher tax liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Breach of contract

A
result of non-performance
Who sue: anyone in privity can, 3rd party beneficiary named by client.
Plaintiff prove: [MILE]
Material misstatement in FS
Info in FS was cause of harm
Loss as result of above
Error, cause by breach
Defense: didn't breach, fully performed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Negligence

A

Who sues: in privity; anyone known or foreseen (except if not in privity for Ultramares states)
Plaintiff prove: [MILE]
Material misstatement in FS
Info in FS was cause of harm and RELIED on
Loss as result of above
Error- no due care/NEGligent (Nondisclosure of info to client, errors discovered not corrected, GAAS/GAAP not followed)
Defenses: followed GAAS, lack of privity, not proximate cause of loss.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Gross negligence

A
Who sues: Anyone, unforeseen
Plaintiff prove all [RIMS]:
Reliance on F/S
Intent to deceive (actual/constructive)
Material misrep/omission, 
Suffered a loss
Defenses: Conducted w/ GAAS, acted in good faith, lack privity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

1933 Act and auditor’s liability

A

Suffered loss (no obligation to prove reliance)
Material misrepresentation (No privity)
then burden shifts to auditor to prove..
Due diligence
Plaintiff knew of the material misstatement before purchase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

1934 Act and liability

A

Same as common law fraud (gross negligence)
Must prove [RIMS]:
Reliance on F/S
Intent to deceive (actual/constructive)
Material misstatement, omission of fact
Suffered a loss as a result of above
* Negligence is not enough to hold CPA liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

1995 Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

A
RIG:
Related party transactions
Illegal acts
Going concern
* Mus notify SEC, auditor given 1 day to either resign from engagement or notify SEC of failure of board to make filing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did the Ultramares court decision rule?

A

That third parties who are not in privity of contract with the accountants cannot sue for negligence (though they can sue for gross negligence).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Diff between gross negligence and scienter

A
Gross negligence (constructive fraud) is the extreme, flagrant, or reckless departure from the standards of due care and competence  
Actual intent to deceive (scienter)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Defenses available to CPA under common law negligence suit

A

Not negligent or fraudulent.
Contributory negligence of the client caused the loss.
Adhered to GAAS and planned audit examination to search for material fraud.
The error was immaterial.
The proximate cause of loss was not the erroneous financial statements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Constructive Fraud and what’s needed to prove

A
Gross Negligence- making false statements w/ a reckless disregard for truth [MR RID]
Misrepresentation
Reckless disregard for truth
Reliance
Intent to rely
Damages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Actual Fraud and what’s needed to prove

A

Making false statements w/ knowledge of their falsity
[MS RID]
Misrepresentation- material misrep of fact
Scienter- intent to deceive
Reliance
Intent to rely
Damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly