Accountant Liability Flashcards
3 actions a CPA will be liable to a tax client for damages
- Failing to file return in timely manner
- Failing to advise client of certain elections
- Neglecting to evaluate joint or separate returns resulting in higher tax liability
Breach of contract
result of non-performance Who sue: anyone in privity can, 3rd party beneficiary named by client. Plaintiff prove: [MILE] Material misstatement in FS Info in FS was cause of harm Loss as result of above Error, cause by breach Defense: didn't breach, fully performed
Negligence
Who sues: in privity; anyone known or foreseen (except if not in privity for Ultramares states)
Plaintiff prove: [MILE]
Material misstatement in FS
Info in FS was cause of harm and RELIED on
Loss as result of above
Error- no due care/NEGligent (Nondisclosure of info to client, errors discovered not corrected, GAAS/GAAP not followed)
Defenses: followed GAAS, lack of privity, not proximate cause of loss.
Gross negligence
Who sues: Anyone, unforeseen Plaintiff prove all [RIMS]: Reliance on F/S Intent to deceive (actual/constructive) Material misrep/omission, Suffered a loss Defenses: Conducted w/ GAAS, acted in good faith, lack privity
1933 Act and auditor’s liability
Suffered loss (no obligation to prove reliance)
Material misrepresentation (No privity)
then burden shifts to auditor to prove..
Due diligence
Plaintiff knew of the material misstatement before purchase
1934 Act and liability
Same as common law fraud (gross negligence)
Must prove [RIMS]:
Reliance on F/S
Intent to deceive (actual/constructive)
Material misstatement, omission of fact
Suffered a loss as a result of above
* Negligence is not enough to hold CPA liable
1995 Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
RIG: Related party transactions Illegal acts Going concern * Mus notify SEC, auditor given 1 day to either resign from engagement or notify SEC of failure of board to make filing
What did the Ultramares court decision rule?
That third parties who are not in privity of contract with the accountants cannot sue for negligence (though they can sue for gross negligence).
Diff between gross negligence and scienter
Gross negligence (constructive fraud) is the extreme, flagrant, or reckless departure from the standards of due care and competence Actual intent to deceive (scienter)
Defenses available to CPA under common law negligence suit
Not negligent or fraudulent.
Contributory negligence of the client caused the loss.
Adhered to GAAS and planned audit examination to search for material fraud.
The error was immaterial.
The proximate cause of loss was not the erroneous financial statements.
Constructive Fraud and what’s needed to prove
Gross Negligence- making false statements w/ a reckless disregard for truth [MR RID] Misrepresentation Reckless disregard for truth Reliance Intent to rely Damages
Actual Fraud and what’s needed to prove
Making false statements w/ knowledge of their falsity
[MS RID]
Misrepresentation- material misrep of fact
Scienter- intent to deceive
Reliance
Intent to rely
Damages