AC2.3 Sociological Theories Flashcards

1
Q

What is sociology

A

Study of society and human behaviour/relationships between individuals and agencies (e.g family, education)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Functionalism

A
  • Emile Durkheim (1858 - 1917)
  • theory about how society and individuals operate
  • society is based on value consensus - shared norms and values are agreed upon
  • social stability - society is a stable structure due to shared norms
  • deviant behaviour weakens norms (anomie) which could lead to society becoming dysfunctional
    -e.g anomie London riots 2011
  • some crime is beneficial:
    -reaffirms social boundaries (social cohesion)
    -social change keeps norms up to date
    -deviance indicates an agency isn’t working
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Functionalism evaluation

A

Strength

  • some crime is good as it reaffirms boundaries and brings social change

Weakness

  • portrays society as overly harmonious - underestimates amount of conflict in society
  • too simplistic - we all agree on values with no freedom/decision making
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Strain theory

A
  • Merton (1968)
  • deviance is a result of a strain between goals and the accepted means of achieving them
  • different levels of society have goals relative to status (upper/lower class)
  • relative deprivation - strain of legitimately achieving goals

If a goal can’t be reached there will be a reaction:

  • conformity - conform to succeeding goals by legitimate means
  • innovation - accept goals but reject legitimate means - crime
  • retreatism - unable to achieve goals and withdraw from society - e.g drug addicts
  • rebellion - reject goals and means - replace goals with alternative goals e.g political activist
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strain theory evaluation

A

Weakness

  • exaggerates working class crime
    -blames lower class that can’t achieve goals
    -doesn’t consider upper class crime
  • doesn’t explain why people behave the way they do
    -could be due to environmental or individualistic factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Marxism

A
  • Karl Marx (1883)
  • theory about conflict between classes in a capitalist society
  • ruling class exploits working class for profit causing inequality - wealth produced by businesses go to individuals who own it
  • Bonger (1961) believes capitalism is based on selfishness/greed - working class is driven to crime due to desperate circumstances of exploitation
  • marx argued capitalism is unfair - predicted a workers revolution - result in fair system/communism

-False class consciousness - working class is not aware of exploitation
-hegemony - ruling class values are forced on working class
-agencies are ideological state apparatus that work for ruling class

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Marxism evaluation

A
  • focuses on laws being beneficial for ruling class
  • ignores ruling class crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Marxism - zero tolerance policing

A
  • police arrest discriminately - e.g 2011 riots minor offences were arrested

Strengths

  • brings back order in society - e.g 2011 riots over in 4 days
  • maintains law and order (right realism)

Weaknesses

  • focuses on working class crime - ignores ruling class crime
  • proves police are ideological state apparatus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ineractionalism - labelling theory

A
  • Becker
  • a label is a reaction by society to a deviant/criminal act
  • labels are used during interactions with others

Becker focused on Malinowski’s study on Pacific Island culture:

  • incest wasn’t frowned upon if discrete
  • if affair became too public, islanders reacted with abuse and ostracised offenders - e.g young man killed himself
  • Becker concluded that society labels individuals as criminal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Labelling consequences - self-fulfilling prophecy

A
  • label is given
  • label is heard often so label is internalised
  • label becomes ‘master status’ so you can withdraw from society
  • define yourself as the label so you act upon it
  • deviant acts are committed which reinforce the label
  • self-fulfilling prophecy is created

E.g Cicourell - typical delinquent

  • if a young person acts as a delinquent they’re labelled as criminal
  • increases chances of getting arrested
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Interactionalism evaluation

A

Weaknesses

  • labels can be rejected
    -not internalised
    -Reiss studied male prostitutes that regarded themselves as straight despite having sex with men
  • deterministic
    -implies that once labelled, deviant acts are inevitable
    -no freedom of choice to change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Moral panics and deviance amplification

A
  • Cohen
  • mods and rockers clash
    -negative labelling ‘folk devils’ marginalised them causing police to crack down on crime
    -led to more arrests and media exaggeration which increased public concern
  • Marxism
    -creation of moral panics is a form of social control to support ruling class against deviant working class
  • interactionalism
    -interested by the process of labelling deviance and the reaction of police/media as a result of the label
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Realism theory

A
  • practical view of crime which offers suggestions for policy change to reduce crime
  • many government policies are inspires by realism - e.g neighbourhood watch
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Left realism

A
  • labour/left wing view based on inequality of opportunity
  • finds root causes of crime and gives people opportunities
  • main offenders are marginalised groups - poor/in disadvantaged communities with less opportunity
  • awareness of poverty and inequality of wealth causes criminality

Marginalisation
- disadvantaged communities with less opportunity
- powerless to improve situation as they have no influence on politics
- e.g young people, unemployed, ethnic minorites

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Left realism - relative deprivation

A

relative deprivation - how deprived someone feels compared to others

Lea and young argue:

  • media promotes material possession
  • but society is becoming more unequal (low pay, benefits cuts, etc)
  • some won’t have the opportunity to afford the media promoted life style
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Right realism

A
  • Conservative/Right wing view, based on rational choice
  • concerned about punishing and controlling crime, not finding root cause

Rational choice theory

  • criminals weigh up risks and rewards before commiting crime
  • if rewards outweigh risks, crime is more likely

Broken window theory

  • visible signs of crime and antisocial behaviour creates an
    environment that encourages crime
  • incivilities - small scale crime which will flourish if not controlled
  • e.g zero tolerance policing targets minor crime, creates environment of law and order, preventing major crime

Communitarianism

  • idea of a connection between the community and the individual offending
  • communities which deal with crime can solve their problems
    -e.g neighbourhood policing
17
Q

Gentrification

A
  • process of renovating ran down urban area which encourages affluent middle class to live and work there
  • raises housing prices
  • working class can’t afford housing/shopping so are displaced
  • e.g Hackney cereal shop
18
Q

Right realism evaluation

A

Weaknesses

Ignores inequalities

  • doesn’t account that some can’t achieve the same as others
  • e.g working class driven to crime due to other factors

Doesn’t tackle root cause of crime

  • focuses on harsh punishment
  • doesn’t prevent future offenders as issue still exists
19
Q

Left realism evaluation

A

Strength

Accounts for inequalities

  • society is unequal which leads to crime
  • e.g working class are driven to crime due to relative deprivation

Tackles root cause of crime

  • stops inequalities to prevent future crime

Weaknesses

Focuses on crime rates in poor areas

  • doesn’t explain ruling class crime
  • e.g white collar crime

Not everyone who is marginalised will offend

  • ignores free will/choice
20
Q

Right Realism policy - penal populism

A
  • policies made by governments to win votes and please public, rather than reducing crime
  • government is tough of crime and punish harshly

E.g sarahs law

  • criminals made a rational choice so should be punished
  • policy causes DBS checks to become law
    protects society from sex
    offenders
21
Q

Right realism policy - prison

A
  • aims to incapacitate and deter criminals

Strengths

  • icncapacitation as criminals are unable to harm public
  • deters offending due to harsh consequences
    -links to rational choice theory

Weaknesses

  • recidivism - 48% adults reoffend in 1 year
  • rehabilitation not effective due to overcrowding and lack of resources
22
Q

Right realism policy - zero tolerance policing

A
  • police arrest all criminals indiscriminately

Strengths

  • stopped London riots in 4 days
  • prevents broken window theory

Weaknesses

  • focuses on street crime and ignores ruling class - Marxism
  • assumes crime is only caused by rational choice
23
Q

Right realism policy - CCTV

A
  • visual, digital record of activity
  • used as evidence or to track/identify criminals so they can be punished

Strengths

  • acts as a deterant
    -83% less crime in 1st year being
    used in London underground
  • identify criminal activity
    -give leads to evidence of crime
    -e.g Wayne couzens identified as
    Sarah Everards attacker

Weaknesses

  • target ethnic minorites/ working class
    -links to left realism - targets
    marginalised groups
24
Q

Right realism policy - situational crime prevention

A
  • measures to prevent crime in specific situations
    -e.g alarms for cars/houses

Strengths

  • reduces opportunities for crime
    -links to rational choice - high risk
    low reward
    -deters criminals
  • improved security prevents crime
    -alarms,etc

Weaknesses

  • expensive
    -marginalised groups can’t afford
  • not always a deterant
    -criminals can bypass an alarm
25
Q

Functionalism policy - restorative justice

A
  • when the offender meets the victim
  • offender takes responsibility for crime
    -gives closure to victims family

E.g Jacob Dunne
-manslaughter for killing man in
drunk fight

Strengths

  • gives closure to victims
    -85% are satisfied with process
  • offenders take responsibility
    -reduces reoffendig rate by 14%
    -reinforces shared values

Weaknesses

  • not suitable for all crimes
    -e.g sexual offences
    -traumatic to meet offender
  • offender might not apologise
    -doesn’t take responsibility
    -waste of money/time and
    doesn’t provide closure
26
Q

A

A
27
Q

Definition of policy and social change

A

policy - laws and regulations made by the government and organisations
social change - change in public attitude/opinion about an issue leading to policy development

28
Q

Social values, norms and mores

A

value - beliefs of why a behaviour is normal which underpin our behaviour

norms - accepted standard of behaviour
-informal unwritten rules
-formal written rules

mores - essential norms society needs in order to maintain civil behaviour

29
Q

Changing social values, norms and mores - smoking

A
  • 1930 it was a social norm
    -glamorised by celebrities
    -encouraged by doctors for health
    benefits
  • today is not a social norm
    -packaging warns of dangers
    -1960 links between lung cancer
  • campaigns like ASH publicise risk of tobacco and push for sales restrictions
  • decline in opinion lead to Health Act 2007
    -smoking in enclosed public
    places illegalised
    -age raised from 16 to 18
30
Q

Public perception of crime

A
  • policies change in society due to changes in social norms
  • these changes affect the publics perception of crime
31
Q

Public perception of crime - Drink driving

A
  • Public began to view drink driving as against norms, so laws were introduced
  • started with no limits and were up to police to decide if someone was unfit to drive
  • views began changing as car ownership increased
    -1951 - 15% 1971 - 55%
  • 1967 Road Safety Act introduced blood alcohol limit
  • 1968 breathalysers introduced at roadside
  • penalty of up to 6 months imprisonment, harsher for repeat offences - reflects publics opinion of the crime
  • 2014 survey THINK! campaign showed 92% think it’s unacceptable
32
Q

Demographic changes

A
  • demography - movement of people, including immigration and emigration
33
Q

Demographic changes - Windrush generation

A
  • 1948 mass migration of commonwealth citizens from west India
  • many lived in Central London clashed with locals for stealing jobs/housing
  • Teddy boys hostile towards migrants leading to Notting Hill riots 1958
  • riots lead to debates over racial prejudice
  • law - Racial Relations Act 1965 outlawed discrimination over race or ethnic origins
  • law - Equality Act 2010
34
Q

Demographic changes - Steven Lawrence case 1993

A
  • metropolitan police criticised for incompetence and racism
  • macpherson report on police suggested 70 policy changes:
    -changed investigations of racist
    offences
    -double jeopardy rule - tried twice
    for a crime
  • stop searches and tasers are still used disproportionately on minorties
35
Q

Cultural changes

A
  • changes in values and attitudes within cultures
36
Q

Cultural changes - LGBT rights

A
  • individualism - belief that individuals have the right to choose howthey live
  • equality act - increasing focus on equal rights for all Arras of society
  • religion - decline in influence of religion on lives, attitudes and values. Religion condemnation of homosexuality has less influence
  • 1967 sexual offence act - legalised homosexuality
  • 2013 marriage act - allowed marriage of same sex couples
  • section 28 of local government act prohibits local authorities promoting homosexuality - removed in 2003

Transgender rights

  • transexuality seen as medical condition
  • attitudes are changing due to individualism
  • 2004 gender recognition act - apply for certificate to change legal gender - campaigns argue that they should have the right to self declare this, but government rejects it