AC2.1 Biological Theories Of Criminality Flashcards
Definition of nature and nurture
Nature - our genetics we are born with such as personality traits and abilities determine our behaviour
Nurture - our environment, upbringing and life experiences determine our behaviour
Physiology - Born criminal theory
- Cesare Lombroso, 1800
- criminals failed to evolve at the same pace as others
- physical characteristics (stigmata) can identify criminals
- atavistic features: large jaw, high cheekbones, long arms, shifty eyes
- atavistic features indicate biological inferiority and primitive nature, suggests they are throwbacks from early stage of evolution
- gathered data by comparing autopsies of Italian criminals and soldiers
- research was androcentric, he didn’t research women as he believed if they committed crimes they were deviant monsters
Physiology - born criminal theory evaluation
Strength
- influenced creation of more biological, social and psychological theories as Lombroso’s theory wasn’t credible
- Shafer (1976) argues lombroso is a founding father of modern criminology
- lead to more credible theories being developed which are used today
Weakness
- negative attitude towards women
- thought women who offended were deviant monsters
- research was androcentric as he only studied dead Italian males
- theory isn’t credible due to bias
Physiology - Sheldon somatotype theory
- Endomorph - fat and soft - friendly
- Ectomorph - tall and thin - introverted
- Mesomorph - muscular and hard - aggressive
- Mesomorphs are most likely criminal (60%)
Physiology - Sheldon somatotype theory evaluation
Neurology - structure of the brain
- Frontal lobe - controls rational thought and behaviour
- Amygdala - fight or flight (fear/aggression response)
- corpsus collosum - problems with understanding consequences of behaviour
- parietal lobe - controls ability to learn
- occipital lobe - can cause hallucinations or psychosis if damaged
- hippocampus - linked to ability to learn from mistakes
Neurology - examples of brain injury
Phineas Gage (1823-1860)
- survived a metal rod through the frontal lobe
- caused personality changes, became more aggressive and irrational
Charles Whitman
- developed violent irrational thoughts which lead to a college shooting
- tumor near Amygdala effected his mental state, constant response of fear/aggression
Neurology - Professor Raine brain study
- compared brains of violent offenders to non offenders
- used P.E.T scanning - inject radioactive chemical into bloodstream, goes to where brain is active, scanner causes trace to glow
Family studies
- Osborne and West
- compared sons of criminal and non-criminal fathers
- 13% of sons with non criminal fathers had a conviction
- 40% of sons with criminal fathers had a conviction
- suggests criminal gene is inherited
Twin studies
- Christansen
concordance rate - chance that one twin shares criminal behaviour expressed by the other
monozygotic - 1 egg, 100% shared genes
dizygotic - 2 eggs, 50% shared genes - monozygotic - 35% concordance rate
- dizygotic - 13% concordance rate
- suggests gene is inherited
Supported by Dalgard and Kringlen - MZ 26% and DZ 15%
Adoption studies
- compare similarities in behaviour between adoptees and biological offspring
- if child is similar to adopted parents - environment has bigger effect
- if child is similar to biological parents - gene has bigger effect
Biological mothers
- Crowe
- if adoptees biological mother had a conviction, they had 50% chance of having a conviction
- if adoptees biological mother didn’t have a conviction, they had 5% chance
Biological and adopted fathers
Mednick
- both not convicted - 10%
- biological Father convicted - 21%
- adopted Father convicted - 11%
- both convicted - 36%
Study supports theory that criminal gene is inherited
Genetic theory evaluations
Strengths
- takes environment into account
-adoption studies shows behaviour isn’t influenced by environment
-e.g adopted father 11%, biological father 21% - evidence that a criminal gene is inherited
-twin studies show MZ has 35% but DZ has 13%
-supported by Dalgard and Kringlen - MZ 26% DZ 15%
Weakness
- doesn’t take social learning into account
-family studies shows 40% of sons with criminal fathers get convicted, but 13% with non-criminal fathers get convincted
-criminality may be because of modelling and environment - criminal gene can’t be scientifically proved
-no evidence
-relys on the studies