AC1.1 Flashcards

1
Q

What are the two main processes for law making?

A

1) Government processes

2) Judicial processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the mnemonic for remembering the process of government law making?

A

Green and White Fat Snails Can’t Reach The Hand Rails.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does Green and White Fat Snails Can’t Reach The Hand Rails stand for

A
Fat = First Reading 
Snails = Second Reading 
Cant = Committee stage
Reach = Reoprt Stage
The = Third Stage
Rails = Royal Assent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happens in the First Reading

A

Name and main aims of bill are read out and a formal vote is taken

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happens in the Second Stage

A

The main Debate takes place followed by another vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What happens In the Committee Stage

A

Chosen group of Representatives looks closely at bill to address any issues and suggest appropriate amendments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What happens in the report stage

A

Committe report back to the hull house who then on the proposed amendments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What Happens in the Third Reading

A

The final vote on then bill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What Happens in the Royal assent

A

The Monarch Signs the bill she cannot refuse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

explain the ‘green paper’ stage of government law making.

A
  • basic proposal for a law/change to an existing law.

- sent to relevant people and published online so people can comment on the proposal and make suggestions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain the ‘white paper stage’ of government law making.

A
  • published by Parliament
  • firmer proposal on the law/change.
  • takes into account the suggestions made while it was a green paper.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain what happens in the House of Lords in the process of government law making.

A
  • similar process (from first reading to third reading)

- if the Lords make any changes to the bill, the House of Commons are told.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which laws give the House of Commons power to make a law without the consent of the House of Lords?

A

The Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 2 different ways that judicial law can be made?

A

1) Judicial precedent

2) Statutory interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is judicial Consent

A

When a judge sets a rule for how a law should be followed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When a judge sets a rule for how a law should be followed.

A

If there is no previous case ruling to follow.

17
Q

who can change a previous ruling or overrule it?

A

A higher court judge like in the Supreme Court - it is binding to all courts below it.

18
Q

What is common law?

A

Judge made law.

19
Q

Give an example and details of a case where an original judicial precedent was made.

A

Donoghue v Stevenson (1932) - the judge ruled that the problem with the drink bought was negligence and allowed the claimant to sue.

20
Q

Give an example and details of a case where a judicial precedent was followed

A

Daniels v White (1938) - the judge followed the ruling of Donoghue v Stevenson to allow the claimant to sue because of a bad drink.

21
Q

What is statutory interpretation?

A

When a judge interprets unclear words or phrases in a part of law. Following cases can then follow this decision.

22
Q

Give an example and details of a case where statutory interpretation was used.

A

Whiteley v Chappell (1868) - the defendant was charged under a section of law which made it an offence to impersonate ‘any person entitled to vote’ but as he had impersonated a dead man it was unclear as to whether or not he was guilty. The judge interpreted the law to rule not guilty as he believed the dead man was eligible to vote.