AC 2.3 - marxism & interactionism Flashcards
sociological theories of criminality
Class, capitalism and crime
- crime is linked to power inequalities in the structure of the class system created by capitalism
- capitalists (bourgeoise) own means of production
Conflict theory
Bourgeoise makes rules that exploit the Proletariat
Exploitative Economic Structure of Capitalism
- society is set up to protect the interests of bourgeoise
- they create laws to protect their economic base
- their need to protect their economic base influences law enforcement
Chambliss (1975)
- Capitalist society was criminogenic
Criminogenic
- (Of a system, situation or place) causing or likely to cause criminal behaviour
- inevitable
- “criminogenic nature of homelessness”
Reiman (2009)
- Argued that crime is invariably portrayed in media and by other capitalist elites (bourgeoise) as the result of some moral failing by individual offenders
- Proletariat = blamed for society’s problems (crime)
- is a type of social control
Snider (1993) - capitalist pass laws to protect their interests
- Lawmakers in the UK & the USA rarely pass criminal laws that threaten the interest of business owners
- Pass laws that protect capitalist businesses and profits
Reiman & Leighton (2009) - capitalist pass laws to protect their interests
- Criminal laws are created by Bourgeoise elites
- Means harsher punishments for Proletariats
Sayer (2015) - capitalist pass laws to protect their interests
- Bourgeoise frames the criminal law to minimise their chances of punishment
- ruling elites create laws to foster a false consciousness that capitalism works and it is fair to all of us
- e.g = health & safety laws intended to protect workers make workers believe capitalism cares for them
Slapper & Tombs (1999) - capitalist elites commit crime
Questioned why there may have been so few prosecutions for misselling of pensions in the UK
Reiner (2012) - capitalist elites commit crime
- Few bankers were prosecuted for economic crimes after the 2008 financial crash.
- E.G = Union Carbide Plant India (1984) - the world’s worst industrial disaster as a leak exposed over 500,000 people to a highly toxic gas.
- at least 3,787 people died
Howard Becker (1963) ‘ Deviance’ is a label
This is because
- deviance is shaped by interactions (like social norms)
- labelling is an example of a social interaction that can change an individuals self-concept & social identity
Key assumptions of Howard Becker’s Labelling Theory (1963)
- the labelling theory is concerned with the effect of labelling people as ‘deviant’
- -to ensure social conformity, some deviance is punished more severely (e.g = blue collar crime)
Becker & later Lemert (1972)
distinguished between primary deviance and secondary deviance
Primary Deviance
- Pointless to try and understand the cause of primary deviance (widespread & trivial which means it mostly goes undetected)
-not part of organised deviance (not habitual) - primary deviants don’t see themselves as deviants
Secondary Deviance
- publically labelled as a criminal, individuals are stigmatised, shamed or excluded from society
- label becomes their master status, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy, whereby further deviance occurs
Becker: master label leads to deviant careers
- master status takes precedence over other labels
- those with negative master labels will be treated negatively by others in society
- those labelled respond negatively embracing the label as their new master status (developing deviant careers)
- process creates a self-fulfilling prophecy
Media labelling can lead to stereotyping of groups
- Stanley Cohen (1972) - ‘Folk Devils & Moral Panics’
- Stuart Hall (1978) - ‘Policing the crisis’
Young (1971) and the Drugtakers - Applications of the labelling theory
- applied the labelling theory to his study of weed users in Notting Hill
Found that :
- users accepted the master status of ‘hippie drug user’
- police targeted users more often
- users found it increasingly difficult to be accepted into normal society
Chambliss (1973): The saints & the roughnecks
- The saints = group comprised of 8 middle-class delinquent boys
- The roughnecks = group comprised of 6 working class delinquent boys
The saints (Chambliss 1973)
- committed anti-social behaviour outside of town
- had less contact with the police
- when they did have contact with the police, they used their cultural capital to get out of trouble
- all 8 graduated from college and got professional jobs
The Roughnecks (Chambliss 1973)
- anti-social behaviour committed locally
- had more contact with the police
- labelled as delinquent
- 4 become offenders
Chambliss (1994): Labelling influences policing
- study of the rapid deployment unit (RDU)
- black areas of Washington DC policed more aggressively than white areas