AC 2.3 - left & right realism Flashcards
sociological theories of criminality
Left realism
- Labour
- Society is flawed
Left realist perspective on crime
- left realism originated in the UK with theorists such as Lea & Young
- it has influenced criminologists in Australia, Canada
Right realism
- Conservative
- Nothing is wrong with society we are to blame
Lea and Young (1984)
- crime is the result of people’s sense of deprivation and marginalisation
- poor social conditions (low wages) lead to sense of relative deprivation
- deprivation creates a sense of marginalisation
- Individuals commit crime and form subcultures
Elaboration : Young (1999)
Suggested that marginalised individuals may have turned to religon rather than crime. In order to cope with their sense of alienation. So crime and religon is a coping mechanism
Marginalised individuals will commit crime to close the gap between themselves and the rest of the world
Runicman (1996)
A group experiences relative deprivation when it feels deprived in comparison to other similar groups or when its expectations aren’t met.
Deprivation will only lead to crime where it is experienced as relative deprivation (commit crime to feel no longer deprived)
Young (1986)
Harsher policing, sentences and more prisons aren’t satisfactory solutions to rising crime (Right realists = prison reduce crime)
Better Policies : Young (1986)
- tackle socio-economic inequalities
- impose community-based sentences
- avoid military-style policing (e.g= excessive stop & search , surveillance
Lea & Young (1986) : analysis of problems of policing
They analysed the problems caused by policing :
- Lacking information that is necessary to solve crime & the support of local communities , police resort to military policing
- E.g = stopping & searching large numbers of people / using surveillance technology
- causes unrest & more crime
Key assumptions : Right realism ( causes of crime)
- most offenders are rational actors (make choices / choose to commit crime)
Crime rate will increase if:
- there’s little risk of getting caught
- if caught , the risk of punishment is negligible
- rewards of crime are high ( e.g = material gain or social status
- The decision to commit crime is a rational choice based on cost-benefit analysis
Charles Murray (1990) - Right realism
- poorly controlled welfare benefit-dependant and crimogenic underclass has emerged
- Dependance on benefits has erased work ethic and helped to create this criminal underclass.
- Single mothers are ineffective agents of socialisation ( teaching right from wrong)
- for boys = mothers are poorly controlled and they lack male role models and authoritative figures in their life
Marsland (1988) & Wilson (1975) - Right realism
- crime is the result of a breakdown in the moral fabric of society.
- fuelled in part by a lack of faith in traditional agencies of social control ( school and police amongst communities)
Routine Activities Theory : Cohen & Felson (1979) - Right realism
- Poor social controls mean that some crime is routine
- Lack of opportunity or risk of getting caught prevent crime
- Offenders are assumed to act rationally
- so in the presence of capable guardians (police) & with no suitable targets , they are likely to be deterred
Elaboration = Cohen & Felson (1979) - Right realism
Argued that for a crime to occur , there must be :
- a motivated offender
- a suitable target
- absence of ‘capable guardians’ (police , neighbours etc)
Broken Windows theory : Wilson & Kelling (1982)
As more crime is committed , social controls deteriorate (leads to more crime)
- over time community civility is lost & people become afraid
- fear of crime contributes to a breakdown in social controls
- Policies should contribute to an atmosphere of order and lawfulness
- maintenance & policing of urban environment contributes to social order ( preventing criminal damage , prostitution etc)