9- SUD Flashcards

1
Q

Historical Perspective (DSM 1-3)

A
  • Temperance Mvnt => First anti-alcohol mvnt which turned to alcohol prohibition
  • Alcohol being good vs war on drugs

DSM:

Early DSMs largely conceptualized substance use as manifestation of underlying psychopathology

DSM-I: A symptom of “sociopathic personality disorder”, Alcoholism and drug dependence, No classes of drugs specified, No specific criteria

DSM-II: Still a personality disorder, Alcoholism and drug dependence,Barbiturates, cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, opioids; Some criteria specified
- “… the inability of the patient to go one day without drinking”
- “… habitual use or a clear sense of need for the drug”

DSM-III: “Substance use disorders” separated from
personality disorders, Each class of substance recognized, Sets of diagnostic criteria established, Distinguish between abuse vs. dependence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Levels of Involvement (DSM 4-5)

A

Use and Intoxication => “Normal” vs Abuse and Dependence => “Abnormal”

DSM-IV: Substance Abuse

  • A maladaptive pattern of substance use leading to distress or impairment

One or more of:

  • Failure to fulfill role obligations
  • Physically hazardous situations
  • Legal/social problems
  • No history of dependence => If dependence, then only get dx of dependence

DSM-IV: Substance Dependence

  • A maladaptive pattern of substance use leading to distress or impairment

Three or more of:

  • Tolerance
  • Withdrawal
  • More than intended
  • Failure to cut down
  • Time spent
  • Other activities given up
  • Physical or psychological problems

Distinction made to indicate severity => Dependence thought to be more severe than abuse (now recognize not always true)

DSM-5

  • No longer recognizes a distinction between “abuse” and “dependence”
  • Now a single dx => With mild, moderate, and severe sub- classifications
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

DSM-5 Dx

A

10 classes of substances:

Alcohol, Caffeine, Cannabis, Hallucinogens, Inhalants, Opioids, Sedatives/hypnotics/anxiolytics, Stimulants, Tobacco, Other or unknown

Problematic pattern of substance use leading to impairment or distress over 12 months

Need two or more:

  • Taken in larger amounts than intended (Impair Cont)
  • Desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut down (Impair Cont)
  • Time spent (Impair Cont)
  • Craving (Impair Cont)
  • Failure to fulfill roles/obligations (Soc Impair)
  • Social/interpersonal problems (Soc Impair)
  • Use in physically hazardous situations (Risky Use)
  • Physical/psychological problems (Risky Use)
  • Tolerance (Pharmaco Depend)
  • Withdrawal (Pharmaco Depend)

*Could technically have up to 10 dx

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Epidemio

A

Prevalence

Lifetime prevalence: 30%
One-year prevalence: 15%
=> But, drinking in general VERY common with over 50% of adults over the age of 18 are “regular drinkers”
- Survey of Canadians aged 15 and older by Health Canada (2016): 77% reported drinking alcohol in past 12 months

Gender/Ethnic

  • In men, rates have traditionally been 2-5 times highe => Western societies, now see less of a difference between men and women
  • Rates typically higher in White and First Nations pop
  • Lower in Black and Hispanic populations => Varies by study
  • East Asian and Jewish populations tend to have lower rates => Genetic polymorphism (alcohol dehydrogenase aka feeling sick) and rates of abuse of other substances similar or higher

Comorbidity

  • ~35-40% also meet criteria for another dx => Bipolar dx, schizophrenia, and antisocial personality dx show markedly increased rates of AUD
  • Also, anxiety and depressive disorders

Why comorbidity?

  • Common risk factors contribute to both
  • Mental dx causes substance use or Substance use causes mental dx?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Course

A

Onset typically in late adolescence/ early adulthood => Median age of onset: 21

  • Though more common in men, women typically deteriorate more quickly

Study: Chronic course? Study of 724 men, all originally recruited as healthy controls for other studies during the late 1930s and early 1940s => Of the 724, 181 (25%) eventually diagnosed with AUD

  • But, decrease in rates with age
  • By age 70: ~50% had chronic course, Between 25-30% recovered, 10% had controlled drinking (not impairing anything)
  • If abstinent for 5 years, unlikely to relapse

Course/Risk:

Heavy drinking associated with increased rates of:

  • Vulnerability to injury
  • Marital discord
  • Intimate partner violence
  • Illness (ex: diabetes, cirrhosis of the liver)
  • Neurocognitive impairments (ex: brain shrinkage)

Decreased lifespan: As much as 12-year decrease and Increased suicide risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Students and Cultural Norms and Gateway Hypothesis

A
  • 86% of students at Canadian universities have drank alcohol in past 12 months
  • More likely to “binge drink” => 18.5% report drinking 5+ drinks 2x/ month or more
  • Males > females
  • Living alone or in residence > living at home

Consequences? Academic, Social

  • ~13% of student binge drinkers meet criteria for AUD

Gateway Hypothesis

  • Alcohol, marijuana, and nicotine are “gateway drugs” => Increases the likelihood of use of other illicit drugs
  • Use does correlate with harder drug use => And often see use of these drugs prior to use of other illicit drugs

=> Not necessarily causal link

  • Doesn’t rule out general tendency towards subs abuse
  • Alcohol and marijuana are just easier to get
  • Also, evidence that abuse of prescription meds can increase alcohol and marijuana use – can anything be a gateway drug?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Biological Factors

A

Family History

  • Child’s risk increases with number of parents who have AUD (ex: one or two parents)
  • Lifetime risk of alcoholism in relatives of alcoholics is 30% compared to 14% in controls
  • Relatives of alcoholics also had higher rates of abuse of other subs
  • Also increased risk for almost all other mental dx
  • General liability for psychopathology? => Slight inclination toward externalizing

Adoption Studies: Ind whose biological parent(s) were alcoholics but adopted by non-alcoholic non-relatives => Look at the freq of alcoholism in ind in adulthood

  • Increased probability of alcoholism => Suggests a bio predisposition *But, biology is not deterministic

Tolerance

If you have to drink more, then you’re slower to recognize the effects aka Drink more, Build up tolerance, Drink more, spiral

  • Sons of alcoholics: balance and coordination after drinking better than in sons of controls
  • May start out less sensitive to the effects of alcohol (subjective and physiological)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Biological - Twins Studies

A

Twin Studies:

  • Group 1: Offspring of all twins (Mz and Dz) with dx of AUD => High genetic risk, high environmental risk (Genes and env are imp)
  • Group 2: Offspring of Mz twins who do NOT meet criteria for AUD but co- twin does => High genetic risk, low environmental risk (x)
  • Group 3: Offspring of Dz twins who do NOT meet criteria for AUD but co- twin does => Moderate genetic risk (bcz 50% of genes), low environmental risk (x)
  • Group 4: Offspring of twins (Mz and Dz) who do not meet criteria for AUD => Low genetic risk, low environmental risk (control)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Physiological Effects

A

Both a stimulant and a depressant

While drinking: stimulant

  • Drinkers report increases in elation, excitement, extraversion
  • Decreases in fatigue, restlessness, depression, tension

After drinking: depressant

  • Decrease in energy
  • Increase in fatigue, relaxation, confusion, and depression

=> Stimulation:

  • Increases in Norepinephrine => Responsible for arousal
  • Increased Norepinephrine associated with increased impulsivity

=> Brain areas affected with decreased activation: PFC, Cerebellum, Hippocampus

=> Alcohol-Induced Heart Rate (Psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction)

  • Sensitivity to rewarding properties of alcohol = risk factor for AUD
  • Measured by increased alcohol-induced heart rate
  • Men with relatives who have AUD show larger increases in heart rate => Those with greatest increases in heart rate more inclined to drink alcohol regularly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Psychological Factors

A

Positive Alcohol Expectancies

Expectancy that alcohol will positively transform social, physical, and emotional experiences

  • Arises through direct learning and social learning
  • AUD more likely to believe that alcohol use will
    result in positive outcomes
  • Priming positive alcohol expectancies increases subsequent alcohol consumption in heavy drinkers

Social-Enhancement Motives (Why do men show such higher rates of alcohol-related problems?)

  • Some evidence that the effects of alcohol are more rewarding for males (inconsistent evidence)
  • Many men report that majority of their bonding with other males occurs in the context of drinking
  • Social processes may explain gender differences => Not as socially appropriate for men to have intimacy, affiliation, self-disclosure

Social Contagion Study: Male and female participants (N=720) drink socially in the lab

  • Both M & F show positive effects of alcohol on mood
  • BUT men experienced an increase in reciprocal smiling when drinking (vs. control)
  • Duration of men’s smiles increased => Making contagion more likely
  • More interpersonally rewarding for men
  • Women in placebo group shared same number of social smiles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Psychological - Reinforcement

A

Reinforcement and Learning

  • Alcohol dependence develops through reinforcement
  • Positive reinforcement: It feels great to BE drinking

Positive Affect Regulation Theory => For many people, drinking increases positive affect (feel more confident, happier) and some evidence that people who are high on reward-seeking or sensation-seeking, more vulnerable to AUD

Negative reinforcement

  • For many, it feels bad to not drink
  • Drink to avoid withdrawal sx

Negative Affect Regulation Theory => Self-medication theories of AUD, Decreases anxiety, sadness, self-consciousness, forgot your worries and some evidence that people with more trait negative affect (ex: depression, anxiety) vulnerable to AUD

=> For many, both positive and negative reinforcement paths leads to increased alcohol consumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Personality Characteristics (3)

A

Beh disinhibition

  • Correlates with severity of alcohol abuse
  • Predates onset on alcohol problems

Negative emotionality

  • One study showed negative emotionality was linked with more rapid escalation of problems following onset of drinking in adolescents
  • Consequence or risk factor?

Deviance proneness

  • General deviant pattern of beh
  • Roots in childhood, attributable to deficient socialization
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Addictive Subs

A

5 main cat: Depressants, Stimulants, Hallucinogens, Opiates, Others

  • Craving for substance
  • Despite serious consequences ex: cancer
  • Desire for it even after years of abstinence

=> Non-Substance Addictive Disorders

In DSM-V, a change from “Substances Disorders” to “Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders”

  • Addictive disorders now include Gambling Disorder
  • Internet Gaming Disorder included as category for future consideration
  • Hypothesized to be similar in terms of clinical expression, neural origins, comorbidity, physiology, and treatment

Prevalence Rates

Use of any illicit drug:

  • 14% for 8th graders
  • 27% for 10th graders
  • 37% for 12th graders
  • 35% for college students
  • 34% for 19- to 28-year olds

Polysubstance use is more common than not => 80% of problem drinkers also smoke, 50% of cocaine users dependent on alcohol

*Neurobiology of Addiction: Mesocorticolimbic pathway (PFC, nucleus accumbens, ventral tegmental area) and dopamine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Opioids

A

Opiate – Natural chemical in opium poppy => Narcotic effects (pain relief)

=> Opioids – Broader term that refers to a class of natural and synthetic substances with narcotic effects ex: heroin, opium, codeine, morphine

  • Activates endogenous opioid receptors => Endorphins
  • Morphine developed as treatment for pain but too addictive so developed heroin
  • Low doses: euphoria, drowsiness, slurred speech, memory impairment, slowed breathing (High can be sustained 4-6 hours)
  • High doses can result in death *respiratory issues
  • Withdrawal symptoms can be lasting (1 week) and severe
  • Less than 1% of Canadians report having ever tried heroin
  • Prescription opioids more prevalent
  • 8% of adults use codeine, morphine, or Demerol => Current “opioid epidemic”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stimulants

A

Amphetamines (Speed)

  • Low doses: increases alertness and attention (tx ADHD)
  • High doses: exhilaration, confidence, elation, vigor,
    reduce fatigue
  • Similar to the effects of adrenaline => Followed by a “crash” and chronic use can lead to fatigue, sadness, intense anger
  • Enhances the release of dopamine and norepinephrine, while blocking reuptake
  • Repeated high doses can cause psychotic symptoms (toxic psychosis)
  • High risk of dependency and withdrawal
  • 6% of Canadians aged 15+ report lifetime usage
    => Methamphetamines (“crystal meth”) – often amphetamine of choice for poorer people

Cocaine

  • Used to be legal and viewed as harmless
  • Short lived sensation of elation, energy, reduced
    fatigue
  • Effects result from blocking reuptake of dopamine
  • Highly addictive, but addiction develops slowly (after 2-5 years)
  • Withdrawal (boredom, paranoia), tolerance
  • Prevalence: 2% of Canadians in 2019
    => Crack: crystallized form of cocaine that is
    smoked, acts faster, also more often consumed by poorer people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hallucinogens

A

Also: psychedelics ex: LSD, psilocybin, mescaline, PCP, ecstasy (Mild: marijuana)
- Change the way the user perceives the world => Delusions, paranoia, hallucinations, and altered sensory perception, Synesthesia
- 11% report lifetime use of hallucinogens => Less than 1% report recent usage, Prevalence peaked in the 60s

LSD *Most common

  • Tolerance tends to be rapid, however, sensitivity returns
  • Withdrawal symptoms uncertain
  • Psychotic delusional and hallucinatory sx can be problematic
  • Unclear exactly how they affect the brain
  • Flashbacks
  • Not viewed as very addictive

MDMA aka ecstasy

  • Unlike other drugs, almost uniformly universal
    pleasure
  • First developed as “diet pill”
  • Tested in middle of last century as a potential treatment for PTSD, phobias, depression, drug addiction, marital conflict
  • Outlawed, but some limited research still being done => Produces a sense of profound well-being initially (serotonin), “Hangover” associated with a profound decrement (serotonin)

Other Hallucinogens as Therapeutics

  • Ketamine: Treatment resistant depression
  • Psilocybin: Trials in which administered to cancer patients in an effort to relieve their anxiety and “existential distress”

=> All focus on delivering carefully controlled doses (In medical env, with trained clinicians)
=> All this research is relatively recent (last 5 years) but need more long-term follow-up

17
Q

Safer Injection Sites (SIS)

A

Also: Supervised Consumption Services

Injection drug use associated with harmful outcomes: Physical health (ex: infections, death), Social environment (ex: crime, drug-related litter)

=> SIS introduced as a harm reduction approach with safe, clean drug equipment (ex: needles), drug checking, emergency medical care, access to mental health professionals, referrals, and social services

*Very common in Vancouver and Sydney, Australia

Lots of critics => Concern that SIS will foster 1) more drug use, and 2) increase drug-related consequences (ex: crime)

Study: Meta-analysis of 75 studies (Mostly research done in Vancouver and Sydney)

  • Reduction in harm among users (ex: less overdoses, less syringe sharing)
  • Attracts the most marginalized individuals
  • Increases referrals to psychological services (ex: detox programs, addictions treatment)
  • Improvements in public spaces => less syringes dropped, less injection-related litter
  • No increase in number of drug users
  • No increase in drug-related crime
18
Q

Treatments - Pharmaco/AA/Controlled

A

Pharmaco Tx

  • Agonist substitution => Replace drug with a safer substance ex: methadone, nicotine gum/patch
  • Antagonists: Blocks the positive effect of the drug, Doesn’t block the withdrawal, Requires high degree of motivation ex: Naltrexone
  • Aversive treatment => Make the drug unpleasant ex: Antabuse (disulfiram) *Noncompliance

AA or Narcotics Anonymous (NA) => 12 step programs

  • Based on disease model
  • Total abstinence => Once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic (Faith in a higher power => Believe they are powerless over their drinking)
  • Key mechanisms: Social support, Structure *Limited research on effectiveness

Controlled drinking => Evidence that some individuals with AUD can learn techniques to drink moderately

Fare better if:

  • Younger
  • Better social and psychological stability
  • Employed
  • Female
  • Less severe alcohol dependence
  • Stronger belief in one’s ability to moderate drinking
    => If someone is very resistant to abstinence (even if severe AUD), can focus on harm reduction
19
Q

Treatments - CBT/MI/Personality

A

CBT

  • Contingency management => Identify antecedents to drinking and high-risk situations, Arrange contingencies to reward sobriety
  • Restructuring thoughts about drinking ex: positive expectancies
  • Relapse prevention => Identify possible triggers, View it as lapse, not total failure

*Already assumed they’re motivated (might do MI before)

Motivational Interviewing

  • People will have varying degrees of readiness for change
  • Ambivalence: stuck between simultaneously wanting to change and not wanting to change
  • MI: Non-confrontational, accepting, person- centered approach => Explore pros and cons of alcohol use, Foster intrinsic motivation to change
  • Demonstrated efficacy among adults

Personality-Targeted Interventions

Four personality-specific motivational pathways to risky drinking in adolescence

  • Hopelessness
  • Anxiety sensitivity
  • Impulsivity
  • Sensation seeking
    => Developed school-based interventions to target each process and Effective at reducing problem drinking sx (lasting effect at 6 month follow up)
20
Q

Brief MI Interventions Study

A

A brief intervention in a medical setting may represent a “teachable moment” for adolescents. Can MI be effective?

Methods: 94 adolescents (aged 18-19), All admitted to ER following alcohol-related incident and randomly assigned to MI or “standard care” => Follow-up interviews 3 and 6 months later

Key results:

  • Drinking was reduced in both groups at follow-
    up, no difference in treatment
  • Risky behaviors were lower in MI gr => Drinking and driving, Alcohol-related injuries, Driving violations (per DMV report)
  • Reduced alcohol-related problems with family, friends, partners, and at school

Conclusion: MI represents a brief, low-cost intervention that may directly reduce functional impairment from drinking