9. Banks & Liquidity Demand Flashcards
Summarise the assumptions in the Diamond & Dybvig model (1983)
Time: 3 dates (t=0,1,2)
Consumer preferences: consumers are ex ante identical
Endowment: 1
State contingent preferences
U(c1) if impatient (prob lambda)
U(c2) if patient (prob 1-lambda)
Where the function u is increasing and strictly concave
Types are private info at t=1. No aggregate uncertainty
When do short term and long term projects yield returns?
-Short term projects yield r1=1 at date 1 per unit of date-0 investment and r2 at date 2 per unit of date-1 investment
-Long term projects yield R>1 at date 2 per unit of date-0 investment and 0 at date 1.
What assumption do we make about autarky which simplifies things?
That it is impossible to liquidate the long term technology. L=0
What is consumption in each period given by in the autarky model?
C1= i1
C2= r2i2+ Ri2= R- c1(R-r2)
What does the representative consumer maximise?
(Lambda)u(c1) + (1- lambda)u(R-c1(R-r2))
Why does the consumer face uncertainty about her liquidity needs?
Because she solves the problem before she knows her type
What are the two possible solutions from the optimisation of the representative consumers maximisation?
An interior or a corner solution
Why can’t i1=0 be a solution?
The fact that the marginal utility of 0 consumption approaches infinity
What does the social planner maximise and what are her constraints?
The same utility as the representative consumer but has different constraints. In particular the social planner only has to meet the aggregate (economy wide) constraints
What is a simple way to solve the model of the social planner?
Normalising the aggregate endowment to unity and then interpret lambda as the proportion of impatient consumers
Describe the meaning of the three constraints in the social planner problem.
The first constraint requires that whatever has been invested in the short term technology will be equally divided among impatient consumers and the second constraint states that the proceeds of the long term technology will be equally divided among patient consumers. The third constraint ensures that the social planner doesn’t violate the resource constraint
Why is the proportion of impatient consumers (lambda) not there in the social planner solution?
Because the social planner can always adjust the amount invested in the short term technology by that proportion.
Why is the return of the short term technology not there in the social planner solution?
Because the social planner will never have to liquidate the long term technology.
Is the autarky solution efficient?
No the social planner problem is
Proposition 1
If the coefficient of relative risk aversion exceeds 1 for all c then at the optimum
1<c1<c2<R