8 - Theory of Mind and Autism Flashcards
Neisser’s 5 Senses of Self
Not necessarily sequential
- ecological self
- interpersonal self
- extended self
- private self
- conceptual self
*sense of self is a gradual developmental process, the aspects together contribute to a higher-order self-concept
Ecological Self
- sense of where we are as we move through the physical environment
> automatic process, emerges at birth
Interpersonal Self
- get a sense of ‘I’ and ‘you” in social interactions
- no empathy yet
- not unique to humans
> emerges shortly after birth
Extended Self
- aware of autobiographic timeline
> connection between past, present and future
+ arises from around 4y
+ some indication that this type of self is needed before children can memorise experiences (maybe why you can’t remember earlier memories)
Private Self
- understand we have private thoughts, perspective that no one else has
> emerges around 4y
+ shown by sharing of dreams
Conceptual Self
- sense of place in a wider sociocultural context (family/class/gender)
> emerges from 4-5y
+ major growth in conceptual self occurs in mid-late childhood
Mirror Test (mark test)
Test of awareness of self
- child is marked on the face and shown a mirror
> by 2y 50% of children can recognise themselves, and point to the mark
Requirements for passing the test:
Self-concept
- children understand that the mirror image is them
Object permanence
- may be a prerequisite for self-recognition (self permanence)
Gender Identity
- perception of oneself as either male or female
> largely biological - from 2y children start developing a gender identity
Gender Typing
- process by which children become aware of their gender and acquire culture-appropriate values/behaviours
- children will start using stereotype features to determine whether another child is a boy or girl (i.e. long hair)
Gender Stereotypes
- beliefs held about how men/women should behave (cultural)
Gender Roles
- reflections of a culture’s gender stereotypes
> influenced by social context
Sexual Orientation
- sexual attraction to members of a particular gender
Gender Typing Theories
Kohlberg’s Cognitive Developmental Theory of Gender Typing
Gender-Schema Theory
Nesdale’s Social Identity Development Theory
Ingroup Favouritism (developmental intergroup theory)
Kohlberg’s Cognitive Developmental Theory of Gender Typing (3 phases)
- Basic gender identity is acquired through reinforcement and role models (2-3y)
> no understanding of gender identity permanence - Gender stability acquisition (4-5y)
- Gender constancy acquisition
> realise others also have gender stability (6-7y)
> recognise that cultural stereotypes of gender don’t necessarily predict gender
Gender-Schema Theory of gender typing
- child develops schemas about gender that help organise and understand information relating to gender
> easier to remember information that is gender-consistent
+ will insist that policemen are always male
> learned up to 3y - at 4-5y, these schemas consolidate
> learn that their schemas are flexible
Nesdale’s Social Identity Development Theory of gender typing (4 stages of Ethnic Attitudes)
- Undifferentiated
> do not differentiate ethnicities - Ethnic awareness
- Ethnic preference
> often to own, but could prefer the ethnic majority - Ethnic prejudice
> not all children reach this
Developmental Intergroup Theory of gender typing
Ingroup Favouritism
- groups form rapidly
- group formation is based on differences
Minimal Group affiliation study
Results:
- kids much more likely to remember positive information on kid with the same shirt (in-group), and negative information for the other shirt (out-group)
- kid much more wanting to play with the in-group kid
Study:
- kids divided into blue shirt/green shirt groups
- both were told a story about a kid in a green/blue shirt with equal numbers of positive and negative characteristics in each
Factors effecting child prejudice
- colour blind language has no effect on child prejudice
- exposure to a diversity of ethnicities reduces prejudice
Self-Regulation
the ability to control our emotions
- requires the ability to inhibit engaging in a desired or natural action (Delay of Gratification)
Delay of Gratification
> ability to inhibit engaging in an action that will bring a desired reward
Marshmallow test
Test of self-regulation (which requires delay of gratification)
- much harder to delay gratification if the marshmallow is in view
- kids employing distraction strategies are much more likely to pass the test
- Study comparing kids in middle-class Germany to local kids in Cameroon (using a locally known treat)
> 30% of german kids passed the test, as normally found
> 70% of Cameroon kids passed, didn’t seem to mind
+ shows that cultural differences have an impact on developing self regulation
+ probably due to cultural rules on behaviour and respect
Longitudinal Glitter test
Test of development of self-regulation
Results of glitter test:
- delay of gratification improves with age
- kids that did well in the glitter test were likely to do well in the stroop test
- Child is shown a desirable (glittery) object and told not to touch it
- tested at ages:
> 14m
> 20m
> 24m
> 36m - all children were seen again at 17y
> tested Executive Functioning via Stroop Test
+ words of colour, letters are in a particular colour
+ have to say the colour of the letters not the word written
Stroop test
Test of executive functioning
+ words of colour, letters are in a particular colour
+ have to say the colour of the letters not the word written