8 B Flashcards
Violence: the roles of attitudes or beliefs: external influences on attitudes
Authoritarianism-the unquestioning acceptance of attitudes given by authority figures (religious leader, parent, teacher, etc.)
conservatism- unquestioning acceptance of attitudes provided by tradition (cultural beliefs, religious rituals, etc). things that have always been done so you dont question them
Violence: the roles of attitudes or beliefs
- a person doesnt have to be evil to perform evil acts
- what is right and wrong is different for everyone
- they can come from yourself
- or they can come from a group that you belong to
Soloman Asch
- the need to conform is a powerful motivator
- most of our beliefs derive from other people’s
- he showed a group of participants a test line and told them to compare it to the other lines to see which was equal length
- all but one were actors, they all said a wrong line, about 1/3 of the participants agreed with them even tho it was obviously wrong more than 50% of the time
why do people conform even if they have serious doubts?
non-conformity has high risks (social exclusion, humiliation, punishment)
-people will do crazy things when a group that they are the member of wants them to
attitudes and tolerance/intolerance: the choice- can people act in ways that you dont believe in? or are you the only right one?
how groups and people resolve this is whether there will be violence, or whether people will accept other’s points of view and such
the groupthink process
- antecedent conditions: insulation of the group, directive leadership, lack of methodical procedures for search and appraisal
- concurrence-seeking tendancy (consensus)
- symptoms of groupthink: illusion of invulnerability, direct pressure on dissenters, self-censorship
- symptoms of defective decision making: incomplete survey of alternatives, incomplete survey of objectives, bias when receiving information
Group polarization
if a group is slightly inclined towards an opinion, then they discuss it, after, they will be very inclined towards that opinion
how can intolerance breed violence and cruelty: cognitive dissonance
- people are tense and uncomfortable when things arent consistent with their values
- when someone or a group behaves in ways that you dont agree with, there is cognitive dissonance
- to reduce this people may: devalue the person or group (they are now an evil group to you, or they are no longer human, just an object, the consequnce of this is that you may be violent and cruel to something that isnt human) or people may act to bring them in line with your values (convincing them that your way is right)
fundamental attribution error
- attribution: the inference that you make about what caused an event
- the fundamentel attribution error: when we overestimate the role of a person’ s personality as the cause of their actions and underestimating the role of the situation (ppl think that it is the persons fault and that they may be lazy or inconsiderate, instead of it being because of traffic or something). and no consideration for them as a person.
the role of attribution: self serving bias
- people are kinder at interpreting their own behaviour
- the self-serving bias: when i do something wrong it is cause of the situation, when i do something right it is cause of my personality (it is different if we are looking at the things that other people do)
the causes of not helping: diffusion of responsibility
- people are less likely to help someone in need if there are more people there to help
- this can all lead to bystander apathy (not helping crime or accident victims)
- this can also lead to social loafing (not working as hard in a group as you would alone)
causes of not helping: just-world hypothesis
-people think that others get what they deserve
-this can lead to blaming the victim
-
ethnocentrism
belief that ones culture or ethnic group is better than all the others
- this creats discrimination to other groups
- this is usually caused by nromal moticves and psychological processes, rather than low intelligence, evil, or phychological disturbances
social identities
- in a group there is a risk of groupthink
- people are members or many groups at once
- having a social identity as a part of a group influences yourr thoughts and behaviour (traditions and morals and etc)
posotive effect of group membership: in group solidarity
- sense of belonging (which we need)
- can give you purpose and help you make sense of the world