7) Identifications Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

2 bases to potentially exclude:

A

1) due process

2) 6A RTC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

due process: applies to

A

ALL types of IDs, at

ALL stages of investigation/prosecution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

DP: BOP

A

D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

DP: test

A

ID procedure used by gvt was

1) so unnecessarily suggestive, that
2) created irreparable risk of mistaken ID (ie unreliable)

then procedure violated DP, and ID can’t be used at trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DP: factors: reliability

A

1) opportunity to view criminal at the scene
2) wit’s degree of attn
3) accuracy of wit’s description
4) degree of wit’s certainty
5) time interval btwn crime and identification (longer time = less reliable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

DP: exception

A

ok procedures inherently suggestive if NECESSARY UNDER THE CIRCS

(not exactly an exception bc it’s a balancing test aynway)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

DP: result of excluding out of court ID

A

subsequent in-court ID by same wit will almost always be excluded as fruit of poisonous tree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

6AM: scope

A

applies only if

1) out-of-court corporeal IDs (human in person) AND
2) only after initiation of formal adversarial process

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

6AM: rule

A

D may not be subjected to out-of-court corporeal ID unless either:

1) L is there, or
2) knowing + voluntary waiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

6AM rule: why L isn’t there

A

doesn’t matter, + police good faith doesn’t matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

6AM: results of violating lineup

A

1) results of lineup is per se inadmissible at trial
2) subsequent in-court ID also prohibited UNLESS:
P can prove (clear/convincing) that in-court ID is “independent” from out of court ID

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

6AM: results: how to know if in-court ID is independent from out of court?

A

look at same reliability factors as DP

also the more suggestive out of court ID was, more difficult it would be to prove dn taint subsequent in-court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

if unlawful lineup and then conviction, on appeal must show

A

HARMFUL ERROR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly