3) Statements + Confessions: Gen + Voluntariness Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

ways to exclude sts/confessions: list

A

1) voluntariness
2) right to counsel
3) 5A or Miranda
4) fruits of illegal conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

voluntariness approach: def

A

statements obtained by actual coercion are involuntary, and inadmissible for any purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

voluntariness: con basis

A

DPC of 5A (fed agents) + 14A (state)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

voluntariness: triggered by

A

gvt conduct that overbears free will of suspect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

voluntariness: test

A

TOC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

right to counsel: def

A

deliberate elicitation of a st from D (who’s been formally charged) is inadmissible unless counsel was present, or police obtained knowing + voluntary waiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

right to counsel: con basis

A

6A right to counsel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

right to counsel: triggered by

A

direct or surreptitious police questioning of a D, w/o L present or waiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

right to counsel: test

A

was counsel present? if not, did D waive?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Miranda rule: def

A

sts obtained as result of custodial irog are inadmissible in prosecution case-in chief, in the absence of Miranda rulings and valid waiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Miranda: con basis

A

5A priv against self-incrim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Miranda: triggered by

A

custody + irog

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Miranda: test

A

did suspect make knowing + voluntary waiver? (if not, sts violate M)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

fruit of illegal conduct: def

A

sts taht comply w these 3 tests may still be tainted if they are the “but for” consequence of predicate con violation (unreasonable search or sz)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

fruit of illegal conduct: con basis

A

fruit of the posonous tree doctrine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

fruit of illegal conduct: trigger

A

but-for link btwn con violation + police obtaining the st

17
Q

fruit of illegal conduct: test

A

is st a product of prior violation? if so, can gvt prove it is sufficiently attenuated from the poisonous tree?

18
Q

DP voluntariness: rule

A

st that is involuntary (ie procured by actual coercion, police conduct that overbears free will of defendant) is inadmissible

19
Q

DP voluntariness: result

A

inadmissible for ANY purpose, including impeachment

20
Q

DP voluntariness: test + factors

A

TOC

factors:
1) chs of actual D
2) chs of irog
3) number + demeanor of police + suspect's experience w crim sx
4) deception
(officer beh/sts)
21
Q

DP voluntariness: factors: chs of D

A
consider this actual D:
age
health
edu
intelligence
gender
cultural background
22
Q

DP voluntariness: factors: chs of interrogation

A

location
duration
physical conditions

23
Q

DP voluntariness: officer beh/sts: ex

A

physical abuse
psych pressures
threats of future harm

24
Q

DP voluntariness: NOT required

A

dnn to be in custody

dnn to know you’re talking to gvt agent