7 - Cognitive Biases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

humans as faulty computers

A

we sometimes fail to understand the forces operating in our social world…. sacrifice accuracy for efficiency in processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

misattribution

A

common sense psychology

Dispositional attributions (internal)
The person is the cause
Situational attributions (external)
Situational factors or other people are the cause

correspondence bias (overestimate personal/dispostional influences on other’s behavior, underestimate situation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ross, Amabile, and Steinmetz (1977)

questioners and contestants

A

both observers and contestants thought the questioner was especially smart, although people were randomly sorted into roles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Perspective Taking - Storms (1973)

A

Found that when watching video from own perspective (looking AT target participant), people made more dispositional attributions but when it was from the other partner’s perspective, they made more situational attributions (taking target participant’s perspective)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

confession study (lassiter and irvine)

A

participants watched bideos of mock police intetrrogation resulting in a confession

• Judged more coercion if videotaped form perspective of suspect than interrogator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

self-awareness

Feningstein and Carver (1978)

A

Feningstein and Carver (1978) - particpants told to imagine a situation, while wearing headphones playing either……

random noise or own heartbeat

way more self-attributions when thought they were listening to heartbeat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

correspondence bias summary

saliency affected by

1.

2.

3.

A

We may be biased toward certain types of attributions
based on what is perceptually salient to us about the event

What is more or less salient can be affected by:

  1. perspective-taking or point-of-view
  2. self-awareness
  3. culture
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Perception is vulnerable - Rothbart & Birrell

Nazi stdy

A

Perception of person in photograph differed based on biographical description – yet looking at same photo all along

o Our perceptions are influenced by expectations, beliefs, or context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

memory is vulnerable

Markus (1986) recall attitude

Bem and McConnell - reacall

A

• Memory is consciously and unconsciously changed and reconstructed to fit certain situations

• Markus (1986)
- Memories of one’s current attitudes reflect more one’s perception of his/her past attitudes than their actual past attitude.….

• Bem and McConnell (1970) Restrictive University policy experiment
o Participants were asked to recall week old attitudes about policy after doing nothing vs. writing an essay in favor of the policy→after writing the essay, attitudes changed, which makes sense. But their recollection of past attitudes also changed to reflect their new attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

misinformation effect

loftus and palmer - car crash study

A

We use misinformation into our memory of an event after witnessing it and receiving misleading information about it

Loftus and Palmer (1974): Depending on how the questions were asked, participants changed their perception of the car crash video,

reconstructing the crash later

if “smashed” was used in question, they thought the cars drove faster and that they saw broken glass (which wasn’t there)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

representativeness heuristic

A

o Judging the likelihood of things by considering how well they represent or match certain prototypical information

• Fischoff and Bar-Hiller, 1984: People see someone who sounds like a lawyer as a lawyer even in the face of potentially conflicting information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

base rate neglect

A
  • Tendency to ignore or underuse base rate information (how common something is) and rather be influenced by a case’s distinct features
  • Tversky and Kahneman (1983): Conjunction of two events can’t be more likely than one of the events (statistics)

base rate only used if its usefulness/applicability is made salient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

availability heuristic

A

o Judging probability of something based on availability in memory of information about it

For example: Perceptions of risk
You’re more likely to be in an accident in the bus or in a car, but plane crashes are in the news

Thus,
More people fear planes than people fear cars

Salience matters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

illusory correlations and premonitions

evidence

A

Perception of a correlation or stronger association between two constructs that doesn’t actually exist

Premonitions: we generally remember when unusual events coincide rather than when they don’t

o Ward and Jenkins (1965) - could seeding/rainy days
o The “Hot Hand” (Gilovich, Valone, and Tversky, 1985)

• Kato and Ruble (1994): While according to their diaries, women were not in a worse mood during pre- and post-menstrual period, remeberd selves as such

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

illusion of control

A

Schaffner (1985)
• College students trained a boy, Harold, to be punctual…. however arrival times were random, people still saw their ‘influence’ on the boy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

strategies to combat bias

1.

2.

3.

A

counter-factual thinknig

increase self-awareness

alrernate POVs

17
Q

counter-factual thinking

A

Sanna, Schwartz, & Stocker, 2002
Participants read about the details and outcome of a historic
battle
Ps asked to generate either 2 or 10 thoughts about how it might
have turned out differently

ppl believed in other outcomes more, when asked only for 2….. when asked for 10 examples it was hard, seemd less likely