10 - Social Identity Flashcards
social identity
The part of the self-concept that is derived
from what the individual knows and feels
about her/his group memberships
It has to be a meaningful group
• You can have more than one!
Self-Categorization
Process of seeing oneself as a member of a group
- We learn about our groups and what it means to be a member of a group through experience and socialization
- Some groups culturally specific
- Based on fact, but often on stereotypes
- Shifts easily
identity activation
1.
2.
3.
4.
Our identities can be brought to mind
What increases accessibility?:
•1.Reminders of group membership
- Presence of outgroup members
- Being in the minority
- Conflict with another group
o Brewer and Weber (1994)
• When people are in the minority it makes their identity more salient
• 2 x 2 x 2
IV 1: Participant is majority or minority
IV 2: Target is ingroup or outgroup
IV 3: Target was attractive/competent or sloppy/incompetent
• To what extent does social identity influence your own social evaluations?
Majority:
• When they saw someone in the outgroup, they didn’t care what that person was doing because it didn’t impact their social identity
Minority:
• The reverse was true of the majority group
• You pay a lot of attention to what the outgroup does
o Basking in Reflected Glory (Cialdini et al., 1976)
- People use group’s successes to boost their own self-esteem
- When students were told they did not succeed on the test (low self-esteem), people used a lot of “we” language when the team won, but used a lot less when the team lost
o Cutting Off Reflected Failure (CORFing)
Snyder, Higgins, & Stucky (1976)
• After failure, people less willing to attend a group
presentation
• Also less likely to take and wear team ‘badge’
The Consequences of
Self-Categorization
• Effects on perception of others and behavior
o We think of other group members as being similar to ourselves
o Prolonged exposure allows us to see uniqueness of group members
o Treating ingroup members more fairly, behaving altruistically toward them
o Outgroup homogeneity effect: When we think about an outgroup, we tend to view them as more similar than they actually are
People possess a need for individuation
• In the ingroup, we learn about the little things that differentiate us
• With the outgroup, the category is enough to differentiate us from them
o Minimal group paradigm (a.k.a. minimal intergroup situation)
• Randomly assign people to a group
• No knowledge of the people in the groups
Thus, no stereotypes
• Given choice between two potential options
Option A: 11 pts to ingroup, 7 to outgroup
Option B: 17 points to each (more points overall, but equal for both teams)
• Most people preferred option A even though they got less points overall!
• People favor their ingroup relative to outgroup, even when the action results in absolute loss for ingroup
Punish outgroup with no advantage to ingroup
Social Identity Theory
The need to derive positive self-regard and “self-esteem” is the driving force behind ingroup/outgroup effects
Conditions for having a social identity
- • Meaningful
- • Sense of shared fate
- • Collective action
Fein &
Spencer (1997)
- IV1: Participants received either neutral or negative feedback on an intelligence test
- Then participants read a passage about an actor living in the East Village
- IV2: Implied actor was gay or straight
- DV: How much do you like Greg?
- People who received neutral feedback liked Greg
- People who received negative feedback said they liked him less, especially when they were led to believe that Greg was gay (all participants were straight)