6. EBD III Flashcards
Screening using DMFT/DMFS
DMFT/DMFS - the # of decayed, missing, or filled teeth (T) or surfaces (S) in a mouth
● best known of all ____
● deft and defs - primary teeth, “e” is a primary tooth
indicated for ____
● limitations:
○ can be invalid if teeth are lost for ____ reasons (trauma, periodontal disease, ortho)
dental indices
extraction
non-carious
Diagnosis - Specific \_\_\_\_ Can involve additional information (complaint of pain, physical sign) Screening - Population \_\_\_\_
individual
asymptomatic
Heart attack 10 patients are taking a particular blood pressure drug. 6 of those ten have a heart attack. ● \_\_\_\_ = 6/10 = 60% ● \_\_\_\_= 6/4 = 1.5 “probability” Difference is in what is in the \_\_\_\_.
risk
odds
denominator
Rare disease
• Rare disease; odds and risk are\_\_\_\_
similar
Cohort vs. Case/Control studies
• Cohort (and experimental) ○ People with \_\_\_\_ and asking if they develop \_\_\_\_ ○ \_\_\_\_ ratio • Case-control ○ People with \_\_\_\_; and looking back in time to see if they have exposure to risk factor ○ \_\_\_\_ ratio
risk factor outcome/disease risk disease odds
Cohort
Exposed
Unexposted
Who develops the ____
• Start with \_\_\_\_ and \_\_\_\_
outcome
exposed
unexposed
Case control
What was the ____?
____ outcome
____ outcome
• Start with the cases and controls
exposure
cases
control
Event rate - the proportion of patients in a group in whom the event is ____. 40/200 = 20%
observed
Example 1: EER/CER
• Exposed event rate • Control event rate ○ No \_\_\_\_
risk factor
Relative risk
RR = ____ / ____
RR > 1 a person with exposure is at ____ risk(benefit)
RR < 1 a person with exposure is at ____ risk(benefit)
RR = 1 no effect
Likelihood that someone exposed to a risk factor (or treatment) will develop the disease (or experience a benefit) as compared with someone unexposed.
EER
CER
increased
decreased
It’s all relative …
RR = 3
3 times more likely to develop condition in the exposed group
* If baseline is 30% > tripling risk will bring to 90% * If baseline at .1% > would only increase to 0.3% * Depends on the \_\_\_\_!
baseline risk
Relative risk = EER/CER = 8/71 = 0.11. The risk of tooth loss is decreased by ____%
89
Relative Risk/Risk Ratio
Relative risk = risk of outcome in those with ____/
risk of outcome in those without the ____
____ STUDIES AND ____ STUDIES
RR = 1 no change
RR > 1 increased risk of disease among those with exposure RR < 1 decreased risk of disease among those with exposure
exposure
exposure
cohort
experimental
Odds Ratio
Odds ratio = odds of ____ in those with the outcome / odds of ____ in those without the outcome
____ STUDIES.
OR = 1 no change
OR > 1 increased frequency of exposure among cases OR < 1 decreased frequency of exposure among cases
exposure
exposure
case control
7 dental students who went to a bar develop food poisoning. Odds ratio = Odds(cases) = ____ = 2.5 = 8.33
Odds (controls) =____ = 0.3
= 8.33
• Don't need to know everyone who ate fish • Compare those were affected and those who didn’t, and ask who ate the fish ○ Odds of those who were food poisoned over those who weren't
a/c
b/d
Confounding
• Universally, any study that olooks at exposrue of tv and enuropshy outcomes; include things other things that make it more complicated > \_\_\_\_ goes away
association
Potential confounders
● \_\_\_\_sex ● Body mass index at 14 years ● Parental\_\_\_\_ level ● Parental social class ● \_\_\_\_ at 4 years of age ● Mother’s alcohol consumption during pregnancy ● Mother’s \_\_\_\_ use during pregnancy
gender
education
babysitter
tobacco
Tooth loss confounding?
• Potential confounders between crown and tooth loss: ○ \_\_\_\_ • \_\_\_\_ people - adjust for potential confounders; if can't randomize, need to measure \_\_\_\_ status so you can measure the association
money
randomized
socioeconomic
Effect Modification
Definition: when the magnitude of the ____ of the primary exposure on an outcome (i.e., the association) differs depending on the level of a third ____.
* Third variable - makes relatinoship stronger * And no varibale - goes away entirely
effect
variable