6 Basics of Experimentations Flashcards
One criterion of science is replicability. Specifies the precise meaning of a variable within an experiment.
Tell others how to carry out an experiment
Operational definitions
Describe exactly what was done to create the various treatment conditions of the experiment.
Experimental Operational Definitions
Consistency and dependability.
Good operational definitions are reliable
If we apply them in more than one experiment, they ought to work in similar ways each time.
Hungry and Not hungry (2 conditions)
If our operational definition is reliable, we obtain similar consequences.
Reliability
Consistency and dependability.
Good operational definitions are reliable
If we apply them in more than one experiment, they ought to work in similar ways each time.
Hungry and Not hungry (2 conditions)
If our operational definition is reliable, we obtain similar consequences.
Reliability
Different observers take measurements of the same responses.
Agreement between their measurement.
Little agreement- measuring procedure is not reliable.
Interrater reliability
Comparing scores of people who have been measured twice with the same instrument. Take the test once, then they take it again (after a reasonable interval). Reliable measure should produce very similar scores each time the person is measured.
Consistently get about the same scores on a personality test, the test is considered reliable.
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III)- excellent test-retest reliability
Test-retest reliability
Extent to which different parts of a questionnaire, test or other instruments designed to assess the same variable attain consistent results.
Scores on different items designed to measure the same construct should be highly correlated
Inter-item reliability
- splitting the test into two halves at random and computing a coefficient of reliability between the scores on the two halves
The two halves of the test should correlate strongly if the items are measuring the same variable.
Split-half reliability
- correlation of each test item with every other item.
Cronbach’s α
Studying the variables that we intend to study.
validity
- Does the content of our measure fairly reflect the content of the quality we are measuring? Are all aspects of the content represented appropriately?
-Racial attitudes - Ratings from objective judges with expertise in the area of racial attitudes
Content Validity
- Do our procedures yield information that enables us to predict future behavior or performance?
- Affiliation
- Subjects who said they wanted to wait with others will seat themselves closer and talk to each other
- Do not observe the overt signs of the desire to affiliate
- The measure does not have predictive validity: it does not predict what people will do.
Predictive validity
- Comparative rather than predictive
- Evaluated by comparing scores on the measuring instrument with another known standard for the variable being studied
- Anxiety measure
- Compare people’s scores on our anxiety test with rating from clinical evaluations of anxiety
Concurrent Validity
- Have I succeeded in creating a measuring device that measures the construct I want to test?
- Intelligence test truly measures only intelligence.
Construct validity