5 Experimental Hypothesis Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

 Thesis or main idea of an experiment
 Statement about the predicted relationship between at least 2 variables

A

Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

 Statement of your predictions of how events, traits, or behaviors might be related
 Not cause and effect
 Phenomenology, case studies, naturalistic observations, qualitative studies and surveys of attitudes or opinions - do not typically include a hypothesis
 Straightforward predictions of the relationships the researcher expects to find between variables

A

Nonexperimental Hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

 Either true or false
 “Hungry students read slowly”
 Contradicted or supported
 “If… then” form
 “If you look at an appealing photograph, then your pupils will dilate”
 Can be true or false

A

Synthetic Statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

 Means for manipulating antecedent conditions and measuring the resulting behavior must exist.

A

Testable Statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

 Can be disprovable by research findings
 “If you read the book of Anne Myers’ Experimental Psychology carefully enough, then you will be able to design a good experiment”
 Experimental design is not very good
 It is not falsifiable
 Any failures to produce the predicted effect can be explained away by the researcher

A

Falsifiable Statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

 Simple hypothesis
 “If you look at an appealing photograph, then your pupils will dilate”
 “If you look at an appealing photograph, then your pupils will dilate if it is a warm Saturday in June”

A

Parsimonious Statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

 Leads to new studies
 When we can think of new studies that will become important if the hypothesis is supported
 Watson and Rayner’s 1920 study of classical conditioning
 Fear of neutral objects could be acquired through learning

A

Fruitful Statements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

 Process of reasoning from specific cases to more general principles
 Athletes cut to the front of the food line.
 No one seems to challenge their behavior

A

Inductive Model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

 Process of reasoning from general principles to make predictions about specific instances
 Stemmed from predictions by equity theory
 Equity is an important determinant of behavior in human relationships

A

Deductive Model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

 Working from research that has been done.
 Nonexperimental studies can suggest cause and effect explanations
 Cigarette smoking and cancer

A

Building on Prior Research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

 “The three Princes of Serendip”
 Adventures of three princes who found many valuable things they were not seeking
 Knack of finding things that are not being sought.

A

Serendipity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

 Knowing without reasoning
 Most accurate when it comes from experts
 Good hunches are really an unconscious result of our own expertise

A

Intuition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  • narrow the number of possible topics
A

Reread

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  • observe people until a testable hypothesis was found
A

Observations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

can be tested in the time frame you have

A

Set realistic goals for yourself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly