5c. Criminal Advocacy Applications Flashcards
What are the likely applications you will be asked to make in the criminal advocacy assessment?
- Bail application
- Mode of trial (Magistrates should retain jurisdiction)
- Admission or exclusion of hearsay/bad character
- Exclusion of confession
- Exclusion of evidence generally
Bail application
What is the first part of a bail application?
Remind the court of defendant’s general right to bail (unless murder).
Bail can only be refused if an exception applies and there is a real prospect of custodial sentence
You could have to argue for or against bail, but the factors are the same
Bail application
What are the exceptions to the right to bail?
- Substantial grounds to fear defendant would fail to surrender, commit other offences, or interfere with witnesses/justice
- Offence committed on bail
- D failed to surrender already in these proceedings
- Not enough evidence to make a decision on bail
Bail application
What four things should you consider if deciding whether substantial grounds exist?
- Nature and seriousness of the offence
- Strength of the evidence
- D’s character
- D’s record of complying with bail conditions
Bail application
How should you finish up a bail application?
- Propose any conditions, if relevant
- Request the application be granted
Mode of trial
What does the Magistrates first consider when deciding whether to retain jurisdiction over an either way offence?
The adequacy of its sentencing powers relative to the nature of the offence in question
Six months for one; twelve months for two or more
Depending on the side you are acting for, you must convince the court its powers are either adequate or not adequate
Mode of trial
What parts of the case documentation would you use to evidence the adequacy of the court’s powers?
- Sentencing guidelines
- Evidence of aggravating/mitigating factors
Hearsay
What is the structure of a hearsay application?
- Hearsay generally inadmissible
- Admissible if an exception applies (statute, case law, etc.)
- Apply the test in support of why the hearsay should be admitted/not admitted
Bad character
What is bad character evidence?
Evidence of, or of a disposition toward:
* Misconduct
* Commission of offences
* Other bad behaviour outside of the facts of the offence in question
Not generally admissible, unless an exception applies
Bad character
What are some of the grounds under which bad character evidence can be admitted?
- Matter in issue between prosecution and defence (including propensity)
- D attacked another’s character
- Important explanatory evidence (including of propensity)
- To correct a false impression given by D
- Matter in issue between co-defendants
Exclusion of evidence
No matter the reason, an application to exclude any evidence (other than confession) is made under what section, and what is the test?
Section 78 of PACE
Court has discretion to not admit any evidence if it would have such an adverse effect on the fairness of proceedings that it ought not be admitted
Exclusion of bad character evidence
Although an application to exclude evidence under s. 78 PACE is at the court’s discretion, which two bad character grounds make it mandatory to exclude if the adverse effect on fairness test is met?
- Matter in issue between P and D
- D attacked another’s character
Exclusion of confession
An application to exclude a confession is made under what section, and what does it provide which should form the opening of your submission?
Section 76 of PACE
Submit to the court that although a confession is generally admissible as a matter in issue between P and D, once challenged, in order for the confession to be admissible, the prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the s. 76 factors were not made out
Exclusion of confession
What are the two factors under s. 76 to exclude a confession?
- Unreliability due to things said or done likely to render the confession unreliable, or
- Unreliability due to oppression
You must then demonstrate how the factors are met on the facts
Exclusion of ID evidence
Other than making a general s. 78 application to exclude the evidence under the adverse effect on fairness test, what should you consider in the context of an application to exclude ID evidence?
The ADVOKATE factors which go to quality of the evidence
The poorer the quality, the bigger the adverse effect on the fairness of proceedings