3b. Probate - Trusts Flashcards
Introduction
What are the two categories of trust?
- Express trust
- Implied trust
Introduction
What are the two types of express trust?
- Private trust
- Charitable trust
Introduction
What are the three types of private trust?
- Fixed trust
- Discretionary trust
- Purpose trust
Introduction
What is a fixed trust?
A trust where the interests of the beneficiaries are defined by the settlor
Trustees have no discretion in relation to distribution of trust property
Introduction
What is a purpose trust?
A trust set up for a purpose rather than people, and will normally fail because it does not have defined beneficiaries, subject to limited honorary trusts, e.g. to maintain an animal
Introduction
What is a charitable trust?
A trust created for the benefit of an indefinite class of people, or the public in general, and it must fall under one of the recognised charitable categories to be valid
Introduction
What are the two categories of implied trust?
- Resulting trust
- Constructive trust
Introduction
In what three situations will a resulting trust arise?
- Interest under an express trust fails
- Express trust fails to exhaust the beneficial interest
- Person makes a voluntary transfer or purchase in the name of another
Introduction
What is the purpose of a constructive trust?
Imposed by the court to prevent unjust enrichment as a result of wrongful conduct
Express private trusts
What are the three certainties required for a valid express private trust?
Certainty of:
- Intention to create a trust
- Subject matter i.e. property
- Objects i.e. beneficiaries
Express private trusts
When must a settlor’s intent to create a trust be expressly manifested?
When they own the property
Express private trusts
However, whilst the intent must exist at the time the property is owned, what can arise later as evidence of this?
Subsequent conduct consistent with an earlier intent
Express private trusts
When must the settlor intend the trust to take effect when they express their intent?
Immediately
Express private trusts
What is a precatory expression and what is the effect of this?
A settlor’s mere hope, wish, or suggestion that property be used in a certain way is not sufficient to show intent to create a trust, i.e. impose a binding obligation on a trustee
I’m giving you £10,000 in the hope you will use it for your child’s education vs I’m giving you £10,000 to use for your child’s education
Express private trusts
What happens when a trust fails for uncertainty of intention?
The property passes as a gift to the person who would be trustee
Express private trusts
Whilst the subject matter must be certain, i.e. clear, when may an apparently uncertain description be valid?
When it is capable of objective definition, e.g. a reasonable income
Amount to be received by a beneficiary must be defined with sufficient clarity also
Express private trusts
What factor determines whether a fractional share of property is valid?
Whether it is tangible or intangible.
Intangible, e.g. shares: Fractions, e.g. 50% or half are valid
Tangible: Not valid unless the fraction has been segregated for the trust, even if the property is identical, e.g. wine of the same type and vintage
Express private trusts
Whilst a future interest can be held in a trust, what cannot be?
An interest not yet in legal existence, e.g. an expected interest in property
E.g. expected interest under a will where testator is still alive (they could change their mind up until death)
Express private trusts
What happens when a trust fails for uncertainty of subject matter?
Property reverts to settlor
Express private trusts
When a collective term for a class of beneficiaries is used, what must it be capable of? What are some examples of valid and invalid collective terms and why?
It must be capable of objective definition.
Nieces, nephews, brothers, sisters are valid because these can be defined by reference to the settlor’s actual family.
Friends, acquaintances are not valid because these are a fluid groups, changing all the time and over time.
This is conceptual certainty
Express private trusts
Where a collective term is used for a class of beneficiaries, what are the two types of test used for (1) fixed trusts and (2) discretionary trusts?
- Complete List Test - used for fixed trusts
- Is / Is Not Test - used for discretionary trusts
Express private trusts
What does the complete list test require for a fixed trust to be valid where a collective term is used for a class of beneficiaries?
Trustee must be able to draw up a complete list of beneficiaries, with evidence
Will fail for evidential uncertainty if not evidenced
Not all beneficiaries need to be in existence, as long as they are ascertainable by the time their interest vests
Express private trusts
Under the complete list test, will a fixed trust fail if a beneficiary is known to exist but cannot be traced?
No
Express private trusts
What is required under the is / is not test for a discretionary trust?
Definition of class must be sufficiently clear to enable to the trustees to assess the potential range of beneficiaries and determine whether any person falls within the class
It is not necessary for the whole range of potential beneficiaries to be ascertainable.
Express private trusts
Why will evidential uncertainty not cause a discretionary trust to fail?
Because a potential beneficiary who cannot prove they are within the class has no right to be considered by a trustee
Express private trusts
Regarding objects, what one thing will cause a discretionary trust to fail despite the relaxed rules on class definition?
Where there are so many beneficiaries that the trust is administratively unworkable
E.g. a trust of £400,000 to be divided among the residents of London
Express private trusts
What happens when a trust fails for uncertainty of objects?
A resulting trust in favour of the settlor or the settlor’s successors is presumed
Express private trusts
Except for honorary and charitable trusts, what must the objects of an express trust be?
Human
Trusts “to maintain freedom of the press” or “to maintain my home” will fail
Express private trusts
Who may be a trustee?
Anyone with capacity to acquire and hold property for their own benefit, even the settlor
e.g. a private individual, a professional person, or a trust company, but not a minor
Express private trusts
Why is it not advisable to appoint too many trustees?
Because trustees must act with unanimity
Express private trusts
What is the minimum and maximum number of trustees allowed?
Minimum of one. No limit on the maximum.
A trust of land must have at least two (one if trust corp) and no more than four trustees.
Express private trusts
What are the two rules against perpetuities?
- Remoteness of vesting rule
- Inalienability rule
Express private trusts
What does the remoteness of vesting rule provide?
An interest under a trust is void if it does not or will not vest within 125 years
Express private trusts
What does the inalienability rule provide?
In the exceptional case where a non-charitable purpose trust is valid, it is valid for either:
- 21 years or
- The rest of a living person’s life plus 21 years
Express private trusts
Where no perpetuity period is given in a non-charitable purpose trust, what is presumed?
That it is for no more than 21 years
Express private trusts
What is a declaration of trust in an inter vivos trust?
Settlor’s irrevocable demonstration by words or conduct satisfying three certainties and perpetuity, that they intend the trustee (or themselves as trustee if it is transfer to self) to be legally bound
Express private trusts
How must a settlor transfer property to the trust?
In the same legal fashion as a PR does to a beneficiary
Assent/transfer deed for land, then registered at HMLR; stock transfer form for shares; chattels delivered with intent
Express private trusts
What is required for a declaration trust of land?
It must be evidenced in writing and signed by settlor
If never evidenced in signed writing, the trust remains unenforceable, subject to anything rendering it unconscionable to deny the interest of the beneficiary (such as proprietary estoppel/imposition of a constructive trust)
Express private trusts
Where a settlor is setting up a trust of land with a third party as trustee, what should be distinguished?
- Requirement for a signed writing to evidence the declaration of trust; and
- Requirement for a deed registered at HMLR to make the transfer
Express private trusts
What is the impact of the maxim equity will not assist a volunteer / perfect an imperfect gift on the process of setting up a trust with a third party as trustee, and what is the name given to the gift in this situation?
What case does this equitable maxim come from?
If an individual attempts to make a gift of property to another but fails to transfer the legal title in the correct manner, equity will not normally enforce the gift (trust property not vested in trustees and trust is void)
Milroy v Lord
The gift is imperfect and fails, because the donee has paid no consideration and is asking the court to enforce a gratuitous promise
Express private trusts
What are the four exceptions to this rule that equity will not perfect an imperfect gift, which also apply to improperly constituted trusts?
- Re Rose - individual has done everything in their power to transfer the property
- Fortuitous vesting rule in Strong v Bird - obtains legal title through a different capacity
- Death bed gifts (donatio mortis causa)
- Proprietary estoppel - unconscionable to change mind
Express private trusts
Under the rule in Re Rose, what must be done for equity to perfect an imperfect gift?
- Settlor has used the correct method of transfer
- Settlor did everything in their power to effect the transfer and has put the property outside their control
- The documents ended up in the hands of the person/organisation capable of effecting the transfer.
Naturally will not apply if they retain possession.
Express private trusts
What are the three requirements for donatia mortis causa, i.e. death bed gifts?
- Gift made in contemplation (not necessarily expectation) of imminent death
- Gift was conditional on death
- Settlor parts with control of property by handing it/something representing title (not simply possession) to the donee.
Express private trusts
What triggers the fortuitous vesting rule in Strong v Bird with regard to (1) gifts and (2) trusts, and what is the effect of the rule?
When does it not apply?
Triggered by donor/settlor dying before transfer is made.
Transfer is complete in law and enforceable if
- Gifts - Recipient becomes the donor’s personal representative
- Trusts - Trustee becomes the settlor’s PR
Rule does not apply if there is evidence that donor changed their mind before they died, by doing something inconsistent with the original gift, e.g. selling it (i.e. must be intention for donee to have immediate gift and intion subsists until death)
Express private trusts
What are the requirements for a testamentary trust, and why is there not a requirement for the testator to transfer the property?
When does the trust take effect?
Trust must be:
1. Revocable until death, and
2. Be contained in a duly executed valid will
No requirement for T to transfer as PRs do this
The trust takes effect upon death
Express private trusts
What is a limited interest beneficiary?
A beneficiary who does not have an interest in the capital of the fund, but only in its income
E.g. a life interest holder
Express private trusts
What are the two requirements for the beneficiaries to call for the termination of the trust and transfer of trust property under the rule in Saunders v Vautier, which trustees are obligated to comply with?
All beneficiaries must:
- Together have an absolute (vested) interest in the property, i.e. an interest in the capital, and
- Be of full age and sound mind
Resulting trusts
What are the three situations in which a resulting trust will arise?
Where:
- Property is transfered to another with no consideration or evidence of any reason;
- Property is purchased using joint proceeds but legal title is not in the name of all parties
- An express trust fails to dispose of all of the trust property
In 1, the transferee holds property on trust for transferor.
In 2, person with legal title holds a proportionate share on trust for the contributor.
In 3, property reverts to the settlor.
Resulting trusts
For the purchase money rules to apply, what must the would-be beneficiary’s purchase money contribution actually go towards?
When must the consideration be supplied?
Consideration for the purchase of the property
Insufficient if money just used to make improvements or pay taxes
Consideration must be supplied before the purchaser takes legal title
Resulting trusts
What is the standard of proof and who has the burden of proving a resulting trust?
The would-be beneficiary must prove by clear and convincing evidence
Resulting trusts
If a presumption of resulting trust has arisen in a purchase money situation, what three things can the title holder suggest to rebut it?
Suggest the money used as consideration was:
- A gift
- A loan
- Payment of a debt
Resulting trusts
How may the provider rebut the presumption of advancement, i.e. argue that a resulting trust should be presumed?
Providing evidence of acts and declarations before or at the time of purchase or transfer to show they intended to retain an equitable interest
Before or at the time, not after
Trusts of the family home
What is a declaration of trust, and is it conclusive even where there was unequal contribution to the purchase?
A document where the parties owning an asset declare they hold it on trust in for themselves and others
Conclusive, unless there is fraud or mistake
Also available when only one party holds legal title, but others contributed
Trusts of the family home
Where proprietary estoppel arises in the context where legal title is only in the name of one party, what will the claimant’s remedy depend on?
- The defendant made a clear promise (in relation to a proprietary right) to the claimant
- The claimant relied on the defendant’s promise
- The claimant suffered detriment as a result of the reliance
- It is unconscionable to let the defendant resile from their promise
Trusts of the family home
What equitable interest is presumed where there is no declaration of trust, and why?
Joint tenancy, because equity will follow the law
Joint tenancy is the only way to hold a legal interest jointly
Trusts of the family home
How is this presumption that equity follows the law with regard to an equitable interest in the absence of a declaration of trust rebutted?
Using evidence that the parties intended otherwise, either before or after the purchase
E.g. the parties intended a different split in the equitable interest