522 - Exam 1 - Chapter 4 (10) Flashcards
1. The Fraud Triangle 2Q 2. Earnings Management 2Q 3. Corporate Culture & Fraud Detection 2Q 4. Fraud Correction Procedures 2Q 5. Fraud Awareness Education 2Q
Fraud Triangle:
Conditions contributing to Fraud:
1. Incentives (motivation) 2. Opportunity 3. Rationalization (excuse/justify self)
What does the 3C’s model describe?
Describes the specific likelihood of FS fraud
1. Conditions (Fraud Triangle: Opportunity & Incentives) 2. Corporate Culture (Fraud Triangle: Opportunity) (ex. weak corp. governance) 3. Choice (Fraud Triangle: Incentive & Rationalization)
More Factors Present = Greater Likelihood of Fraud
how can opportunity be created?
A. Management Override
1. Improper JEs
2. Misuse of discretion (think estimates)
3. Mis-accounting for unusual 1-time transactions
B. Collusion
Examples of rationalizations
- Nobody is getting hurt (the big players can afford losses)
- The shareholders & the company will benefit
- The situation is unique – people would understand if they knew
- The ends justify the means – it’s for a good purpose
- Everyone else is doing it
Conditions that make fraud more likely:
- Benefits > Costs (Given the probability of detection and possible consequences)
- Economic pressure from downward trend in earnings
- Downturn in organizational performance
- Continuous decline in industry performance
- General economic recession
Tactical vs. Strategic management focus
Tactical - ST “fix” with no LT focus - “get it done” (ex. earning mgmt) Strategic - LT holistic approach - ST + LT focus
Conditions That Typically Signal Increased Likelihood of Fraud (15)
- Poor Corp. Governance (opportunity)
a. BoD
a1. Ineffective BoD
a2. Ineffective Audit Committee
b. CEO/CFO
b1. Dominant/little accountability
b2. Activities are unmonitored/no executive disclosures required - Related-party transactions, lacking transparency and/or oversight (opportunity)
- Internal audit ineffective
- External auditors inexperienced, change frequently, or “too comfortable” (opportunity)
- Unable to secure credit (pressure)
- Unfavorable economic conditions (pressure)
- Insufficient Cash Flows (especially if earnings growth is reported) (pressure)
- Restrictive Loan Agreements (pressure)
- Excessive Bad Debt Expenses (Poor AR collection) (pressure)
- Excessive investment and/or losses (pressure)
- Dependent on a few customers (Sales too concentrated) (pressure)
Poor Corporate Governance Results in:
- Aggressiveness and Opportunism
- Cohesiveness and Loyalty
- Trust and Ineffective Controls
Purpose of IC (3)
Prevent
Detect
Correct
VIEs (FASB ASC 810-10, formerly FIN 46 (Revised))
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions - Various Interest Entity
…an entity (the investee) in which the investor holds a controlling interest that is not based on the majority of voting rights. The importance of identifying a VIE is that a company needs to consolidate such entities if it is the primary beneficiary of the VIE.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variable_interest_entity
How does Corp. Culture relate to Fraud?
Opportunity - Certain Corporate Cultures Make Fraud More Likely
1. Effective Corporate Governance increases probability of prevention and/or detection 2. Corporate Governance – proper accountability for managerial & financial performance
Ways to alter Corp. Culture
SOX, Recent SEC Rules, Stock-Exchange Listing Standards Are Intended to Alter Corporate Cultures and to Decrease Likelihood of Fraud
Purpose of Correction Procedures
- Restate current & prior-year FS accurately
- Assess contributing factors, in order to limit future threats
- Restore public confidence
General Post-Fraud Responses
- Update & refine Internal Controls
- Improve Corporate Governance
- Institute Fraud Awareness Education program
Fraud Awareness Education Topics on Slides (10)
- Principles vs. Rules-Based Accounting
- Fair Value Accounting
- Off-Balance Sheet Transactions (VIEs)
- Wall St. Analysts Have Limited Insight
- Rating Agency System is ineffective
- Unexpected executive resignations are NOT a good sign
- Whistle-blowers are important sources of information
- Objective, independent Board inquiries are a necessity
- Ethical character can’t be faked or compartmentalized
- Should you trust an unethical individual? Post-fraud betrayals are common in FS fraud cases