5. PCR in PLP Flashcards

1
Q

OUTLINE FOR ALL PCR ISSUE Qs

A
  1. WHAT IS THE PCR ISSUE
  2. WHY IS IT AN ISSUE ON THESE FACTS?
  3. ADVICE AND ACTION
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

THIRD PARTY INSTRUCTIONS

A

P(4) – best interests
O(1.2) – protect client interests
IB(1.25) – seek authority

advice: obtain confirmation that other client can speak on its behalf (written record = best practice)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

CONFIDENTIALITY AND DISCLOSURE

A

P(4) – best interests
O(4.1) – keep affairs confidential
O(4.2) – disclose all information material to retainer
O(4.3) – confidentiality overrides disclosure

advice - stop acting for one of them (BUT there might be mortgage fraud issues)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

MORTGAGE FRAUD

A

p(2) - integrity

  • if new solicitors ask Q as to why you stopped acting for them
  • evasive or lying = serious danger of breaching P(2)

p(1) - uphold rule of law
- even if new solicitors don’t ask searching questions, you run risk of aiding and abetting mortgage fraud

advice - stop acting for borrowers unless they permit disclosure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

FSMA 2000

A

NB. LET EXAMINER KNOW U KNOW DEFINITIONS ARE IN RAO NOT FSMA

s. 19(1) FSMA - breach is criminal offence
s. 22(1) - specified investment + specified activity = regulated activity

specified investment = PART III RAO (incl. mortgage contract s.88, s.61(3))

specified activity = Part II RAO, art.53

advice:
- advising NOT allowed (e.g. type of mortgage, merits of one over another),

  • but generic advice is fine (advising on terms after they’ve already decided on mortgage)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CLIENT CONFLICT

A

P(4) – best interests
O(3.5) – can’t act for B and S if client conflict

Indicators showing O(3.5) might not be fulfilled: IB(3.14), IB(3.3)

advice:

  • is there client conflict (consider IB 3.14, 3.3, 3.7)
  • do exceptions apply
  • O(3.6) not apply if IB (says its about O(3.6))
  • O(3.7) only if tender/auction process (‘same objective’)

NB. Common purpose to get deal done is not substantially common interest (SCI = conflict must be peripheral, which it isn’t if negotiations must be done)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

acting for borrower and lender exam structure

A
  1. O(3.5)
  2. GLOSSERY (define client conflict)
  3. acting for L/B - can you act for L/B too while still achieving O(3.5) and p(4)?
  4. issue on the facts - why?
  5. O(3.5) met? IB guidance - 3.7, 3.3 applicable?
  6. exceptions apply?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

acting for buyer and seller structure

A
  1. O(3.5) duty to avoid client conflict unless O(3.6) O(3.7) applies
  2. glossery - define client conflict
  3. does o(3.5) apply? (IB(3.14), (3.3)
  4. Exceptions apply? (O(3.6)) - CONSIDER IB 3.5, 3.11, 3.12
  5. does O(3.7) apply? probs not - only for tender or auction process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

MONEY LAUNDERING (MLR 2017) - DOES IT APPLY

A

reg.27 MLR - relevant purpose carry out CDD

define terms in reg.27 (8 and 12)

business relationship or occasional transaction

if applies - apply CDD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when is mortgage not standard

A
  • lender is individual

- terms need to be negotiated (not standard)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

when would it not be in client’s best interest to act for both lender and borrower?

A

Where firm does a lot of work for lender and doesn’t want to lose it as a client

So it agrees deal which is not in borrower’s best interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

when would it not be reasonable to act for both lender and borrower?

A

Where firm does a lot of work for lender and doesn’t want to lose it as a client

So it agrees deal which is not in borrower’s best interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

when would you not be using certificate of title in “approved” form?

A

when lender insists you include information not in the remit of the certificate of title

e.g. B’s creditworthiness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly