5. Managing Global Teams Flashcards
What is a global team?
A group of heterogeneous employees from two or more countries, and sometimes two or more companies, who work together to coordinate, develop, or manage some aspect of a firm’s global operations.
Why do companies use global teams?
- Need specific cross-cultural expertise on some aspect of the business or when they partner with a foreign firm.
- Often do a better job than homogeneous teams consisting exclusively of either home- or host-country nationals.
- Opportunity to incorporate widely differing social, cultural, and business perspectives into key decisions affecting the success of international operations.
Advantages of global teams?
- Frequently more creative ideas and solutions
- Takes longer to take decision but often more comprehensive, realistic and acceptable
- Often leads to better understanding of multinational employees
- Often increases understanding of global markets
- Often more effective in working with international customers
Drawbacks of global teams?
- More difficult to develop close-knit groups
- Takes longer to take decision but often more comprehensive, realistic and acceptable
- Action plans can take longer to implement
- Different work habits can lead to conflicts and misunderstandings
What do polychromes believe?
Time stretches to accommodate a task; they devote much time to analysis before proposing solutions
What do monochromes believe?
Time and tasks should be scheduled, organised and managed; problem analysis should be undertaken quickly to avoid loosing valuable time
How do different cultures analyse problems?
Polychrons
Monochrons
People analyse problems from their own cultural perspective
Power-distance-accepting cultures expect
team leaders to make decisions
Power-distance-rejecting cultures expect
everybody to be included in decision-making
Two types of decision making preferences are?
Power-distance-accepting
Power-distance-rejecting
How is decision-making is more complex in multi-cultural teams?
- Members of multi-cultural teams analyse problems differently
- Diverging opinions regarding which alternative is best
- Diversity makes building consensus more difficult
Global teams in Sweden (Meyer)
Learn to make decisions through lengthy consensus building, which can span many meetings but eventually leads to strong buy-in and rapid implementation.
Global teams in France (Meyer)
Descartes-inspired education system teaches that debate and confrontation are necessary elements of any decision- making process.
Global teams in US (Meyer)
Managers are trained to solicit input from a team, choose a direction quickly, and make adjustments as the project moves forward.
Global teams in Japan (Meyer)
Decisions tend to be made in informal one-on-one discussions before a formal group meeting.
Global team linguistic ability
- Teams forced to communicate in one language
- Not all members use their own native language
- Results in miscommunication between team members
- Undermines confidence to participate in teamwork
Global team communication style?
Low-context
High-context
How do low-context cultures communicate?
Directly/explicitly
• What people want to say is on surface of their message
How do high-context cultures communicate
Indirectly/implicitly
• Crucial information of message is hidden below surface
What is mistrust in global teams?
- People prefer to work with members of their own culture
- They tend to mistrust ‘others’
- Mistrust reinforced by inaccurate stereotyping
- Aggravated by tendency to speak own language
What is stress in global teams?
- Mono-cultural teams can openly discuss problems and issues
- Cross-cultural teams are more afraid of offending other members
- Forces a ‘polite diplomatic’ approach to sensitive issues
- Leads to artificial/superficial behaviour that increases stress on organisation
- Team members become frustrated
Advantages of cross-cultural teams?
Diversity raises creativity - Wider range of perspectives - More and better ideas - Less groupthink Increased creativity leads to - Better problem definitions - More alternatives - Better solutions and decisions Teams can become - More effective - More productive
Disadvantages of cross-cultural teams?
Diversity undermines cohesion - Mistrust - Miscommunication - Stress Lack of cohesion prevents teams - Agreeing - Gaining consensus - Taking concerted action Teams can become - Less effective - Less productive
What is the paradox of cross-cultural teams?
As creativity increases productivity decreases
What does the paradox curve of cross-cultural teams show?
Cross-cultural teams can either be highly effective or highly ineffective
Single-culture teams are typically of average effectiveness
Ma Yun, Global year sunergy?
“If we are a good team and know what we want to do, one of us can defeat ten of them.”