5. Cladistics Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define a ‘clade’.

If you’re interested or it helps you learn it: where is the term ‘clade’ derived from?

A

a group of organisms that evolved from a common ancestor:

  • can be large groups with a common ancestor far back in evolution
  • or can be smaller groups with a more recent common ancestor

‘clade’ derived from Ancient Greek “klados” - a branch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How can evidence for which species are part of a clade be obtained?

A
  • by looking at any characteristics anatomical features are now rarely used because it is sometimes hard to distinguish between homologous traites
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Evidence for which species are part of a clade can be obtained by looking at any characteristics. Is there an exception to this statement? Why?

A

anatomical features are now rarely used:
- because it is sometimes hard to distinguish between homologous traits derived from a common ancestor, and analogous characteristics that have developed by convergent evolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Evidence for which species are part of a clade can be obtained by looking at any characteristics. What is usually used to identify which clade a species should be in? Why?

A

base sequences of a gene are used, or the corresponding amino acid sequence of a protein:
- sequence differences accumulate gradually, so there is a positive correlation between the number of differences between two species and the time they diverged from a common ancestor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why is classifying humans particularly difficult?

A

because the differences between humans and other species seem so huge to us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Give an example of how can cladistics be used to produce an objective classification of humans?

A

sequencing mitochondrial DNA and then constructing a cladogram (p.70)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How long ago did humans and chimpanzees split into separate classifications (according to sequence differences in mitochondrial DNA)?

A

5mil years ago

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How long ago did Africans and European/Japanese split into separate classifications (according to sequence differences in mitochondrial DNA)?

A

140,000 years ago

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How long ago did European and Japanese split into separate classifications (according to sequence differences in mitochondrial DNA)?

A

70,000 years ago

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are cladograms?

A

tree diagrams that show the most probable sequence of divergence in clades

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are branching points on cladograms called? What do they show?

A
  • branching points called nodes

- show groups of organisms which are related, and therefore presumably had common ancestry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What two things related to cladograms grew towards the end of the 20th century? What is significant about this?

A

1 amount of base and amino acid sequence data
2 analytical power of computers
grew exponentially.

Cladograms could therefore be produced showing the probable evolutionary relationships of large groups of species.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Better (more accurate and larger) cladograms could be made towards the end of the 20th century. What did this lead to?

A

a re-evaluation of the classification of many groups of organisms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is ‘cladistics’?

A

the method of classification using cladograms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What has evidence from cladistics as a new method of classification shown us?

A

that classifications of some groups based on structure did not correspond with the evolutionary origins of a group or species

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give an example of an organism that has been re-classifed following new evidence generated by cladistics.

A

the figwort family of plants (Scrophulariaceae)

17
Q

What did cladograms of the figwort family of plants (Scrophulariaceae) reveal?

A
  • species in the family did not all share a recent common ancestor
18
Q

How did this new evidence - that species in the Scrophulariaceae family did not all share a recent common ancestor - change our classification of Scrophulariaceae?

A

1 some genera were therefore moved to:

  • the plantain and broomrape families
  • two newly created families - lindernia and calceolaria families

2 two existing families, the buddleja and myoporum families, were found to contain species that shared common ancestry with the figwort (Scrophulariaceae) family so they were merged with it

19
Q

Is cladistics the definitive way of classifying plants?

A

no - just as the traditional classification was falsified and replaced as a result of cladistics, evidence may be discovered that shows further reclassification is needed

20
Q

What two things can analysing cladograms show us?

A
  • how closely organisms are related to each other

- the probable sequence in which groups split

21
Q

Practice reading cladograms.

A

-