5-6 Court Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Barron vs. Baltimore (1833)

A

The Supreme Court rules that the bill of rights limited only the actions of the U.S government and not those of the states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Gitlow v. New York (1925)

A

The U.S supememe Court notes that the states were not completely free to limit form of political expression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Near v. Minnesota (1931)

A

Found that prior restraints on publication violate freedom of the press is protected under the first amendment, a principle that was applied to free speech generally in subsequent jurisprudence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Palko v. Connecticut (1937)

A

was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the incorporation of the Fifth Amendment protection against double jeopardy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

A

The court rules that the recitation in public school classrooms of a brief nondenominational prayer drafted by the local school board was unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Abington School District v. Schempp (1963)

A

The court rules that state-mandated bible reading or recreation of the Lord’s Prayer in public schools was also unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)

A

The court tried to carve out a three-part Test for laws dealing with religious establishment issues.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Christian Legal Society v. Martínez (2010)

A

The court ruled that the university of California Hastings college of law could deny recognition and therefore funding to the Christian legal society because the group limited its membership to those who shared a common faith orientation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Schenck v. U.S (1919)

A

Ruling that congress had a right to restrict speech “of such nature as to create a clear and present danger that will bring about substantive evils that congress has a right to prevent.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)

A

The court fashioned a new test for deciding whether certain kinds of speech could be regulated by the government : the direct incitement test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

New York Times Co. v. U.S (1971)

A

The Supreme Court ruled that the U.S Government could not block the publication of secret Department of defense documents illegally furnished to the times by anti war activists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart

A

That any attempt by the government to prevent expression carried a “heavy presumption against its constitutionality “ in this case, a trial court issued a gag order barring the press from reporting the lurid details of a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stromberg v. California (1931)

A

The court overturned a communist youth camp directors conviction under a state prohibiting the display of a red flag, a symbol of opposition to the U.S. government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)

A

The right of high school students to wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam war was upheld.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R.A.V v. City of St. Paul (1992)

A

The court rules 5-4 that a white teenager who burned a cross on a black family’s front lawn, thereby committing a hate crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964)

A

Case in which the Supreme Court concluded that “actual malice” must be proven to support a finding of libel against a public figure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire

A

The court articulated the fighting words doctrine , a limitation of the first amendments guarantee of freedom of speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Roth v. U.S. (1957)

A

To be considered obscene, the material in question had to be “utterly without redeeming social importance,” and articulated a new test for obscenity:” whether to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interests.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Miller v. California (1973)

A

The court set out a test that redefined obscenity. To make it easier for states to regulate obscene materials, the justices concluded that lower courts must ask “whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by state law.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Dejonge v. Oregon (1937)

A

Incorporated the first amendments freedom of assembly clause to apply to the states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Seed Scott v. Sandford (1857)

A

Chief Justice Roger B Taney listed the right to own and carry arms as a basic right of citizenship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

US v. Miller (1939)

A

A unanimous court upheld the constitutionality of the act, stating that the second amendment was intended to protect a citizens right to own ordinary militia weapons and not sawed off shotguns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

D.C. v. Heller (2008)

A

The court ruled that the second amendment protected an individuals right to own a firearm for personal use in Washington, D.C

24
Q

Miranda v. Arizona (196)

A

A landmark Supreme Court ruling that held the fifth Amendment requires that individuals arrested for a crime must be advised of their right to remain silent and to have a counsel present.

25
Q

Map v. Ohio (1961)

A

The warren court rules that “all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the constitution, is inadmissible In a state court.”

26
Q

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

A

Lawyers in criminal courts are necessities, not luxuries,”therefore, the court concluded the state must provide an attorney to I️ digest defendants in felony cases.

27
Q

Furman v. Georgia (1976)

A

The Supreme Court effectively put an end to capital Punishment, at least in the short run .the court ruled that because the death penalty often was imposed in an Arbitrary manner, it construed cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the eighth and fourteenth amendments.

28
Q

Gregg v. Georgia 1976

A

Georgia’s rewritten death penalty statue was ruled constitutional by the Supreme Court.

29
Q

McCleskey v. Zant (1991)

A

Produced new standards designed to make it much more difficult for death-row inmates to file repeated appeals.

30
Q

House v. Bell (2006)

A

The court ruled a Tennessee death-row inmate who had exhausted other federal appeals was entitled to an exception to more stringent federal appeals rules due to DNA and related evidence suggesting his innocence.

31
Q

Griswold v. Connecticut

A

The right to privacy is explained by the court to justify striking done a Connecticut statue prohibiting married couples access to birth control

32
Q

Roe v. Wade (1973)

A

The court finds that a woman has right to have an abortion Based on her right to privacy.

33
Q

Harris v. McRae (1980)

A

The court upholds the Hyde amendment, ruling that federal funds can not be used to pay for poor women’s abortions.

34
Q

Bowers v. Hardwick (1986)

A

The court upholds Georgia’s sodomy law, finding that gay men and lesbians have no privacy right

35
Q

Webster v.Reproductive Health services (1989)

A

The court comes close to overruling Roe; invites states to fashion abortion restrictions

36
Q

Planned parenthood of southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey (1992)

A

By the narrowest of margins, the court limits Roe by abolishing it’s trimester approach.

37
Q

Lawrence v. Texas (2003)

A

In overruling bowers, the court, for the first time , concludes that the right to privacy applies to homosexuals

38
Q

Gonzales v. Cape hart (2007)

A

Supreme Court upholds the federal partial birth abortion ban act.

39
Q

Weeks v. U.S (1914)

A

The U.S Supreme Court adopter the exclusionary rule, which bars the use of illegally seized evidence at trial.

40
Q

Marburg v Madison (1803)

A

Court establishes “judicial review” concept- affirms the courts position as a coequal branch of government having considerable influence on the politics of government and direction of public policy

41
Q

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

A

Marshall Court defines what is meant by “necessary and proper” and established the primacy of federal government power over state government

42
Q

Gibbons V. Ogden (1824)

A

Marshal court says only national government can regulate interstate commerce,not individual states per Art I, sect.8 commerce clause.;):?))

43
Q

Dred Scott v. sandford (1857)

A

Missouri compromise was unconstitutional

Slaves were not U.S Citizens And could not bring suits in federal court

44
Q

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

A

Separate but equal accommodations did not violate the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment

45
Q

Brown v. Board of education (1954)

A

School segregation is unconstitutional because it violated the fourteenth amendments guarantee of equal protection

46
Q

Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg School district (1971)

A

All vestiges of state-imposed segregation or discrimination by law must be eliminated at once

47
Q

Korematsu v U.S (1944)

A

All legal restriction which curtail the civic rights of a single racial group are immediately suspect and should be given the most rigid scrutiny

48
Q

Reed V. Reed (1971)

A

Equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment prohibited unreasonable classification based on sex

49
Q

Craig v Boren (1976)

A

Gender classifications are unconstitutional

50
Q

Hernandez V. Texas

A

Mexican Americans were entitled to a jury that included other Mexican Americans

51
Q

Yick Wo V. Hopkins

A

Found San Francisco ban on cleaners operating in wooden buildings unconstitutional because it violated the fourteenth amendment

52
Q

Romer V Evans

A

An amendment to the Colorado constitution that denies homosexuals the right to seek protection from discrimination was unconstitutional under the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment

53
Q

Lawrence V. Texas (2003)

A

The court reversed an earlier ruling, finding a Texas statue naming sodomy to be unconstitutional.

54
Q

Tennessee v Lane (2004)

A

Disabled persons could sue states that failed to make reasonable accommodations to assure that courthouses are handicapped accessible

55
Q

Regents of the University of clCalifornia v.Bakke (1978)

A

Upheld affirmative action allowing race to be one of several factors in college admissions policy

56
Q

Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)

A

The court voted to uphold the constitutionality of the university of Michigan’s law school admissions policy which gave preference to minority applicants