4.1.3 attachment 🐒

Question 1

define attachment

Answer 1

attachment is a close two way emotional bond between two individuals in which each sees the other as essential for emotional security.

Question 2

what are the three attachment behaviours

Answer 2

proximity
seperation distress
secure-base behaviours

Question 3

define proximity as an attachment behaviour

Answer 3

proximity - how close somebody is to who they are attached to. People try to stay physically close to whom they are attached to.

Question 4

define seperation distress as an attachment behaviour

Answer 4

seperation distress- people are distressed when an attachment figure leaves their presence.

Question 5

define secure base behaviours as an attachment behaviour

Answer 5

secure base behaviours- evene when we are independent of our attchment figures we tend to make regular contact-based behaviour when they regularly return to their attachment figure while playing.

Question 6

what are the two types of caregiver-infant interaction

Answer 6

reciprocity

interactional synchrony

Question 7

define reciprocity as a type of caregiver-infant interaction

Answer 7

reciprocity is a description of how two people interact. mother and infant interaction is reciprocal in tn that both mother and infant respond to each others signals and each elicts a response from the other. the baby takes an active role in attachment.

Question 8

define interactional synchrony as a type of caregiver-infant interaction

Answer 8

interactional synchrony is when mother and infant reflect both the actions and emotions of the other and do this in a coordinated (synchronised) way.

Question 9

how does meltzoff and moores study support interactional synchrony

Answer 9

meltzoff and moore found that two week old babies an association was found between the expression or gesture that adult model had displayed and the actions of the babies

Question 10

how does isabella study support interactional synchrony

Answer 10

isabella et al found that high levels of synchrony were associated with better quality mother-infant attachment e.g emotional intensity of the relationship.

Question 11

one strength of meltzoff and moores study to support interactional synchrony- observation

Answer 11

its an observation that was filmed , observations capture fine details and it was filmed from multiple angles- higher internal validity

Question 12

one limitation of meltzoff and moores study to support interactional synchrony - observation

Answer 12

because it is an observation it shows us what is happening but it doesnt give us perspective in to why it happens , why is the infant responding in a synchronised way . It is also hard to observe infants as we dont know whether actions are conscious are not.

Question 13

what was the aim of schaffer’s study into the stages of attachment

Answer 13

schaffer and emerson aimed to investigate the form of early attachments , in particular , the age of which they developed their emotional intensity and to whom they are directed.

Question 14

outline the procedure of scahffers study into stages of attachment

Answer 14

longitudinal of 60 babies in glasgow from working class families.
babies were visited in their homes every month for a year and then again at 18 months
the mothers were questioned about the babies seperation anxiety and stranger anxiety.

Question 15

outline the results of schaffers study into stages of attachment

Answer 15

between 25-32 weeks of age - 50% of babies showed seperation anxiety to a particular adult.(usually the mother)

attachment tended to be towards the carer that was most interactive and sensitive e.g reciprocity

by 40 weeks - 80% of babies had a specific attachment

Question 16

what are the four stages of attachments

Answer 16

stage 1- pre-attachment stage
stage 2-indiscriminate attachment
stage 3-discriminate attachment
stage 4-multiple attachments

Question 17

outline stage 1 of scahffers stages of attachment - pre attachment stage

Answer 17

this is up to 6 weeks of age , infants show little discrimination or preference towards humans (asocial) there is some preference for familiar adults.

Question 18

outline stage 2 of schaffers stages of attachment - indiscriminate attachment

Answer 18

approximately 1-7 months old . they start to show a greater preference for social stimuli e.g a smiling face rather than inanimate objects

Question 19

outline stage 3 of schaffer’s stages of attachment - discriminate attachment

Answer 19

from the age of 7 months , infants form one special attachment with their primary attachment figure and show seperation anxiety when seperated

Question 20

outline stage 4 of schaffers stages of attachment - multiple attachments

Answer 20

soon after a main attachment is formed an infant develops a wider circle of multiple attachments . 29% of infants had a secondary attachment within a month of forming a primary attachment.

by the age of one year the majority had developed multiple attachments.

Question 21

outline one strength of schaffers stages of attachment study - ecological validity

Answer 21

one strength is that this study has ecological validity and mundane realism , they were tested in their own homes and observations were made by parents - means that babies activities unlikely to be affected by researchers.- more natural behaviour

Question 22

outline one strength of schaffers stages of attachment study- longitudinal study

Answer 22

this study is longitudinal - it studies the children as they age - this means children will not have been affected by confounding variables or individual differencesbetween participants which would of been present if it was a cross sectional design.

Question 23

outline one limitation of schaffers stages of attachment study- unrepresentative sample

Answer 23

the study is an unrepresentative sample - it is using only working class families in the 1960’s it doesnt represent other groups or time periods.

Question 24

outline one limitation of schaffers stages of attachment - - problems with measuring multiple attachments

Answer 24

there are problems with measuring multiple attachments , just because a baby gets distressed when an individual leaves doesn’t mean that they are attached, this behaviour is also displayed when a playmate leaves- this highlights problems with internal validity.

Question 25

what percentage of infants formed an attachments to their father by the age of 18 months according to schaffer and emerson

Answer 25

schaffer and emerson claim 75% of all infants formed an attachment to their father by 18 months.

Question 26

define degree of of sensitivity as part of the role of the father.

Answer 26

fathers who show sensitivity to the needs of the infant develop more secure attachments

Question 27

what did grossman find in his study about the role of the father

Answer 27

fathers have a different role in attachment , quality of fathers play with infants was related to the quality of adolescents attachments.

Question 28

what did tiffany find about the role of the father

Answer 28

the level of parental response engagement is more important than the gender of the parent.
in the study they found that primary caregiver fathers spent more time holding , smiling than secondary caregiver fathers

Question 29

outline one limitation of research into the role of the father - inconsistent findings

Answer 29

there are inconsistent findings when researching into the role of the father , researchers are often interested in different theories and questions e.g primary v.s secondary caregivers . there is no clear answer about why fathers dont generally become the primary attachment figure . could be because of socialised gender roles or biological factors e.g higher oestrogen levels in women

Question 30

outline one strength into the research of the role of the father - importance of paternal relationships

Answer 30

research into the role of the father highlights the importance of paternal relationships e.g their role in stimulation , or their ability to be a primary caregiver

Question 31

what are the two animal studies of attachment

Answer 31

Lorenz study on imprinting

Harlow study on contact comfort

Question 32

outline the procedure of Lorenz animal study of attachment - imprinting

Answer 32

Divided a clutch of gosling eggs into two groups.
Group one- hatched with natural mother.
Group two- placed in an incubator and first moving object they saw was Lorenz.

Question 33

outline the results of Lorenz animal study of attachment- imprinting

Answer 33

group 1 followed the mother around , group 2 followed lorenz around even when the two groups were mixed together. they had imprinted.

Question 34

define imprinting

Answer 34

imprinting is when bird species that are mobile from birth attach to the first moving object they see for safety .

Question 35

what did lorenz identify about a critical period for imprinting

Answer 35

lorenz identified a critical period in which imprinting needs to take place , this can vary between species. if imprinting does not occur within that time lorenz found that chicks did not attach to a mother figure.

Question 36

outlin one strength of lorenz research into animal study’s of attachment- influential in the development of pyschology

Answer 36

findings have been highly influential within the field of developmental psychology.
Lorenz research suggests imprinting is irriversible and is under biological control and it happens under a specific time frame.
lead developmental psychologists (such as Bowlby) to develop well recognised theories of attachment suggesting the attachment formation takes place during a critical period and is a biological process

Question 37

outline one limitation of lorenz research into animal study’s of attachment - generalisability?

Answer 37

lorenz can be criticised for extrapolation.
Lorenz conducted his study on imprinting on animals
humans and animals are physiological different. The way a human infant develops an attachment with their primary caregiver could be different to the way a goose forms an attachment with their primary caregiver, therefore the findings cannot be generalised.

Question 38

outline one strength/limitation of lorenz research into animal studys of attachment - other research

Answer 38

guiton replicated lorenz research , chicks exposed to a yellow rubber glove imprinted on them - supports imprinting . as the chicks were older they tried to mate with the rubber gloves however when they were exposed to their own species again this behaviour stopped , questions how flexible imprinting is, not as permanent as lorenz suggests?

Question 39

outline the procedure of harlows animal study into attachment - contact comfort

Answer 39

16 baby monkeys reared with two wire mothers.
in one condition - milk dispensed from plain wire mother
in another condition - milk dispensed from cloth covered mother
he measured how long they clung to the mother for and frightened them to see which mother they ran to for comfort

Question 40

outline the results of harlows animal study into attachment - contact comfort.

Answer 40

In both conditions, baby monkeys cuddled the soft ‘mother’ in preference to the wire ‘mother’ and sought comfort from the cloth ’mother’ when frightened.

This showed that ‘contact comfort’ was more important than food in attachment.

Question 41

what did harlow find about the monkeys involved in his research when he followed them into adulthood

Answer 41

Followed the monkeys who had been deprived of a real mother in childhood to adulthood to assess the effects of maternal deprivation.
These monkeys were the most dysfunctional:
Highly aggressive
Less sociable,
Unskilled parents- neglected/ killed young.

Question 42

outline one limitation of harlow’s research into animal studies of attachment - ethical issues / generalisability?

Answer 42

Ethical implications- lasting emotional harm to monkeys involved as seen when they followed the monkeys into adulthood.
the rhesus monkeys from the study showed great distress in social situations and were unable to communicate with other monkeys. In addition, when the monkeys from the study had their own children many were said to neglect their offspring
Harlow’s study can be seen to be in breach of the BPS guidelines (it fails to protect the monkeys from harm). Furthermore, this study doesn’t tell us anything about the formation of human attachments (monkeys and humans are physiologically different). - lack of generalizability causes it to be more unethical.

Question 43

outline one strength of harlow’s research into animal studies of attachment - practical value and theoretical value ,

Answer 43

Harlow’s research had theoretical value- showed attachment does not develop due to feeding (learning theory) which was a common theory at the time.
Harlow’s research had practical value- showed social workers the impact of neglect and abuse – showed how to care for animals in captivity.

Question 44

outline one strength of harlows research into animal studies of attachment - lab setting

Answer 44

it was conducted in a controlled, laboratory setting.
Harlow was able to control potential extraneous variables such as the monkeys being taken away from their mothers straight after birth, the baby monkeys not being exposed to any love or attention from their biological mothers.
control of variables meant that he was able measure what he set out to do - factors affacting attachment
high internal validity , cause and effect relationship can be established

however lab setting could lack ecological validity - the artifical setting could affect monkeys behaviour

Question 45

what are the two explanation sof attachment

Answer 45

social learning theory

and bowlbys montropic/evolutionary theory

Question 46

outline bowlbys monotropic/evolutionary theory of attachment

Answer 46

bowlbys monotropic theory involves four main principles , infants evolved to show attachment behaviours e.g social releasers . they use these to develop one unique attachment with a particular individual. this attachment must be formed by 2.5 years or developmental issues occur. the internal working model is used to inform future relationships.

Question 47

what are the four main principles of bowlbys monotropic theory that we must know .

Answer 47

evolution
monotropy
internal working model
critical period

Question 48

explain evolution as a principle of bowlbys monotropic theory

Answer 48

bowlby argued that infants evolved a need to attach to caregivers.
through natural selection infants developed attachment behaviours called social releasers e.g crying and smiling
social releasers help maintain ad attract attention from the caregiver
adult caregivers respond to social releasers through displays of sensitive responsiveness

Question 49

explain monotropy as a principle of bowlbys monotropic theory

Answer 49

bowlbys argued that althougfh attachment behaviours such as social releasers are shown indiscriminately (to anyone) at first ,
infants then form one main attachment e.g the mother
bowlby acknowledges that we do form other attachments growing up
however THE FIRST ATTACHMENT IS UNIQUE AND THE STRONGEST

Question 50

explain critical period as a principle of bowlbys montropic theory

Answer 50

bowlby argued that the first attachment has to be made within the first 2.5 years ,
if the attachment is formed or is damaged/broken it can have severe effects on a childs emotional and social development

Question 51

explain internal working model as a principle of bowlbys monotropic theory

Answer 51

bowlby claims our first attachment forms a template for how we form expactations for future adult relationships .
it is a working model because it develops as attachment develops
if a child has strong monotropic relationship-efefctive adult relationships
if a child has a negative monotropic experience -antisocial behaviours

Question 52

outline one limitation of bowlbys monotropic theory of attachment- mixed support for montropy

Answer 52

schaffer and emersons 1964 study found that most babies did attach to one person first , however they also found that a significant minority appeared to form multiple attachments at the same time.

Question 53

outline one strength of bowlbys monotropic theory of attachment- supporting studies - harlow

Answer 53

harlows rhesus monkeys study supports his theory , the monkeys attached to a comforting caregiver highlighting the importance of sensitive responsiveness underlies attachment.monotropy places emphasis on the importance of a close relationship, the monkeys in the study neglected their offspring because they didnt experience a proper caregiver and had a faulty internal working model

however its an animal study how far can we generalise it

Question 54

outline one strength of bowlbys monotropic theory of attachment - internal working model supported

Answer 54

bailey et al assesed 99 mothers with one year old babies by interviewing mothers and observing children, found mothers who reported poor attachments to their own parents had children that were more likely to have children with poor attachments . supports the internal working model and predicts patterns of attachment.

Question 55

one limitation of bowlbys theory -define temperament in the context of attachment and why might it be a problem for bowlbys theory of attchment

Answer 55

temperament is the childs genetically influenced personality

it may be a problem for bowlby as it provides a credible alternative explanation. e.g shows ehy babys may show seperation anxiety more than others. however it cannot explain importance of responding to early interactions (reciprocity) in developing good quality attachments

Question 56

explain learning theory of attachment

Answer 56

learning theory of attachment consists of two kinds of conditioning , operant and classical. The theory suggest that infants learn to become attached to their caregivers. Sometimes known as cupboard love theory.

Question 57

explain how classical conditioning plays a role in learning theory of attachment.

Answer 57

learning by association
Food is an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) which produces an unconditioned response (UCR) of pleasure.
During the infant’s early weeks the mother (NS) becomes associated with food because they are present when the infant is fed.
The NS (mother) becomes a CS which produces a CR of pleasure. Learning theorists called this newly formed stimulus-response ‘cupboard love’.

Question 58

explain how operant conditioning plays a role in learning theory of attachment

Answer 58

learning by reinforcement
Crying leads to a response from the caregiver e.g. feeding.

As long as the caregiver provides the correct response for the child then the behaviour is reinforced.

The baby then directs crying for comfort towards the caregiver who responds with comforting ‘social suppressor’ behaviour.

The reinforcement is a two-way process. The caregiver is negatively reinforced because the crying stops- escaping something unpleasant is reinforced

Question 59

explain how drive reduction theory plays a role in forming an attachment.

Answer 59

an instinctive need that causes behaviour to change

Hunger is a primary drive- it is an innate and biological motivator; we are motivated to eat to remove the drive.

As caregivers provides food the primary drive of hunger becomes generalised to them.

Attachment is thus a secondary drive learned by an association between caregiver and satisfaction of primary drive.

Question 60

outline one limitation of the learning theory of attachment - counteracting studies

Answer 60

strong evidence against learning theory- schaffer and emerson found feeding may not play a huge role as learning theory suggests
found the first attachments formed by 39% of babies was not to the person who carried out physical caree.g feeding
.Attachments were more likely to be formed to those individuals who are sensitive and rewarding to the baby and who play with the infant.
responsiveness might be more important.

Question 61

outline one limitation of the learning theory of attachment - animal studies going against it

Answer 61

harlows study into rhesus monkeys found comfort was more important than feeding .

Question 62

outline one limitation of the learning theory of attachment- over simplistic

Answer 62

learning theory of attachment ignores other factors associated with attachment e.g reciprocity. studies found best quality attachments are with sensitive carers that pick up on infants signals .

Question 63

outine one strength of the learning theory of attachment - could still explain behaviour

Answer 63

SLT could explain attachment- parents model attachment behaviour.
Some elements of conditioning could still be involved- association could be between attachment figure and comfort.

Question 64

outline the procedure of ainsworths strange situation

Answer 64

to classify different attachment types , mum and baby engaged in 8 episodes through the study whilst being observed and the infants behaviour was recorded every 15 seconds.
Eight episodes, designed to highlight key behaviours: proximity seeking, exploration and secure base behaviour, stranger anxiety, separation on anxiety and response to reunion.
Ainsworth combined data from several studies and found three main attachment types

Question 65

what were the three main attachment types found in ainsworths strange situation

Answer 65

Type A- insecure avoidant(20-25% of brittish toddlers)

Type B - secure (60-75% of brittish toddlers)

Type C - insecure resistant (3% of brittish toddlers)

Question 66

what characteristics are shown by Type A insecure avoidant toddlers

Answer 66

• Happy to explore the environment with or without caregiver.
• Show little response to separation.
• Show little or no social interaction and intimacy with others.

Question 67

what characteristics are shown by Type B secure toddlers

Answer 67

• Use caregivers as a secure base to explore the environment.
• Not likely to cry if their caregiver leaves.
• Show some distress when left with a stranger.
• When feeling anxious they are easily soothed by their caregivers.

Question 68

what characteristics are shown by Type C insecure resistant toddlers

Answer 68

• Seek & resist social interaction with others.
• High levels of separation anxiety & stranger anxiety.
• When reunited with their caregivers they show conflicting behaviours and resist being picked up.

Question 69

outline one strength of ainsworths strange situation-Replicable/ high inter-observer reliability

Answer 69

the research is highly operationalised

observers have a clear view of how a securely attached infant should behave, due to the 4 specific criteria that Ainsworth used

it is also replicable so its reliability can be checked.

Question 70

outline one limitation of ainsworths strange situation-Low Population Validity/culturally bias

Answer 70

major methodological criticism of Ainsworth’s research is that the sample was restricted to 100 middle class Americans & their infants, so it is unlikely that findings would be representative of the wider population.

SS was designed by an American according to observations of US children.criteria used to classify infants are based on US values, relating to child-parent behaviour. It could be argued that this is Eurocentric, so observations of non-Americans will judged according to American standards.

Question 71

outline one limitation of ainsworth strange situation- strict control

Answer 71

the strict controls used for the observations might have increased the likelihood of mums showing demand characteristics , thus causing a lack of mundane realism

Question 72

outline one limitation of ainsworth strange situation - an extra attachment type ?

Answer 72

Main & Solomon (1986) analysed over 2000 SS videotapes to find a fourth type- “insecure-disorganised” (type D)- children are strongly attached and then avoidant. this could show the original study may be lacking in validity.

Question 73

outline Ijzendoorn and Kroonernberg’s study into cultural variations of attachment

Answer 73

They completed a meta analysis of 32 different studies of the strange situation taht were conducted across 8 countries , to look at the proportions of each attachment type across a range of countries

Question 74

outline the results of Ijzendoorn and kroonernbergs study into cultural variations of attachment

Answer 74

Secure attachment was the most common in every country.

Insecure-avoidant attachment was the next most common in every country except Israel and Japan, which are two collectivist cultures.

Variation within cultures, they found that this was 1.5 times higher than the variation between cultures.

secure being the most common-suggests attachment is innate

Question 75

outline one strength/limitation of kroonernberg and Ijzendoorns study into cultural variations of attachment- meta analysis good or bad?

Answer 75

They used a meta analysis

strength-analysed over 2000 babies in their study- reduces impact of participant variables. was quicker to get data , larger sample sizes are more generalisable .

limitation- some studies might be outdated , and some of the data may not be good quality as you werent there to ensure it.

Question 76

outline one limitation of kroonernberg and IJzendoorns study into cultural variations of attachment - biasing data towards a western perspective

Answer 76

18 of the 32 different studies were done in the usa , only one was done in china , biasing the data towards a western perspective.

Question 77

outline one limitation of kroonernberg and IJzendoorns study into cultural variations of attachment - role of the media

Answer 77

Ijzedoorn and kroonernberg suggested that cultural similarities might be explained by the media , it presents ideas about parenting - children all over the world may be exposed to similar parenting as a result of the media.

this could go against bowlbys theory of secure attachment being innate , could just be because of projection from the media.

Question 78

why has the strange situation been criticised for being ethnocentric

Answer 78

the SSp has been accused of being an imposed etic, which is the application of ideas and concepts devloped in one culture to measure and explain behaviour in another culture.

different cultures value different kinds of behaviour therefore child rearing practices will reflect this , a childs behaviour in the strange situation is a reflection of culture more than attachment

Question 79

define bowlbys theory of maternal deprivation

Answer 79

maternal deprivation is the emotional and intellectual consequences of seperation between his/her mother or substitute mother. Bowlby proposed that continuous care from a mother is essential for normal psychological development and that prolonged seperation from this adult causes serious damage to emotional and intellectual development.

Question 80

outline what bowlby believes about maternal deprivation

Answer 80

Proposed that prolonged emotional deprivation would have long-term consequences on emotional development.

Infants and children need a ‘warm, intimate and continuous relationship with a mother (or mother-substitute)’ for normal mental health.

Early childhood separation will only have an effect if it takes place during the critical period of development – first 30 months.

Potential damage can be avoided if suitable emotional care is provided by a mother-substitute.

Question 81

name four consequences of maternal deprivation

Answer 81

An inability to form attachments in the future (internal working model)

Affectionless psychopathy (inability to feel remorse)

Delinquency (behavioural problems in adolescence)

Problems with Cognitive Development-Intellectual development- Goldfarb (1947) found lower IQ in children who had remained in institutions compared to those fostered with more emotional care.

Question 82

outline bowlbys study into maternal deprivation-44 juvenile thieves

Answer 82

aim- to investigate whether teh causes of affectionless psychopathy could be linked to maternal deprivation

88 children-All of the children were emotionally maladjusted.

44 of the children were ‘thieves’ and the other 44 children used were a control group.

14 of the 44 ‘thieves’ showed little sign of affection, shame or sense of responsibility – a group he called’ affectionless psychopaths’.

Found that 12 out of 14 (86%) affectionless psychopaths experienced frequent early separation from their mothers, in comparison to just 17% of the other thieves.

Only 2 of the 44 in the control group had experienced long term separation.

These findings suggest that early childhood separations are linked to affectionless psychopathy.

Question 83

what is the difference between privation and deprivation

Answer 83

privation is the failiure to form any attachment in the first place , whereas deprivation is the loss of an attachment after it has been formed .

Question 84

outline one limitation of bowlbys research into maternal deprivation- clarity between privation/deprivation

Answer 84

Rutter drew a distinction between privation and deprivation.

Rutter claimed that severe long term damage bowlby associated with deprivation is more likely to be as a result of privation. IN bowlbys study he didnt distinguish between privation and deprivation.

was bowlby acc measuring what he set out to do ? lack oc clarity reduces the internal valdity of the findings

Question 85

outline one limitation of bowlbys research into maternal deprivation- counteracting research against critical period

Answer 85

Koluchova found a case of twin boys who were isolated from the age of 18 months until they were 7 they were locked in a cupboard. After they were looked after two loving adults and appeared to make a full recovery.

this goes against bowlbys idea that the first 30 months of your life are critical and psychological damagae as a result of deprivation is inevitable if no attachment is formed.

IT coukd show the critical period may be more of a sensitive period , may increase the chance of psychological damage but doesnt guarantee it.

Question 86

outline one strength of bowlbys research into maternal deprivation- real world application

Answer 86

RWA- Bowlby’s work led to major changes for children cared for in Hospitals e.g. parents now encouraged to visit.

Question 87

define institutionalisation

Answer 87

a term for the effects of living in an institutionalised set

Question 88

outline the procedure ruttersenglish and romanian orphan study (ERA STUDY) into institutionalisation

Answer 88

Rutter and colleagues followed 165 romanian orphans adopted in britain to see to what extent they could make up for poor early experience in institutions.

Physical, cognitive and social development were examined using interviews with parents and teachers at age 4, 6, 11 and 15.

Progress compared with 52 British children who were adopted before they were six months old.

Question 89

outline the results rutters english and romanian orphan study (ERA STUDY) into institutionalisation

Answer 89

By the age of four, some of the Romanian children had caught up with the British children.

However, those adopted after six months showed significant deficits and signs of disinhibited attachment, highlighting the long-term consequences of institutionalisation.

Mean IQ of those adopted before 6 months was 102, compared to 86 for those adopted between 6 months and 2 years.

Differences remained at 16 years old

Question 90

outline one strength of rutters ERA study into institutionalisation- real life application

Answer 90

studying the romanian orphans has enhanced understanding of the effects of institutionalisation

e.g children homes now avoid large numbers of caregivers for each child to avoid disinhibited attachment and help children develop normal attachments

this shows it has been valuable in practical terms

Question 91

summarise the findings about attachment in Rutters ERA study

Answer 91

disinhibited attachment was strongly associated with institutional rearing when children were adopted after 6 months.

Question 92

what are symptoms of disinhibited attachment

Answer 92

attention seeking
clingyness
social behaviour directed indiscriminately towards all adults , both familiar and unfamiliar

Question 93

outline one strenth into Rutters ERA study into institutionalisation- few extraneous variables

Answer 93

it has fewer extraneous variables than other orphan studies .
in other studies the children involved experienced trauma and neglect and other cofounding variables.

in the romanian orphan study they were able to study institutionalisation without the confounding variables , therefore there is increased internal validity.

Question 94

outline one limitation into Rutters ERA study into institutionalisation- lack of generalisability

Answer 94

Lack Of Generalisability-
The Romanian Orphanages were not typical of other types of Institutionalized care. The children were raised in extreme conditions where they were given poor care and very low levels of intellectual stimulation
. The conditions were so bad that we must ask whether the results can be applied to any other effects caused by any sort of Institutionalization.

Question 95

outline one limitation into Rutters ERA study into institutionalisation- lack of clarity over long term effects

Answer 95

The long-term effects aren’t clear-ERA only followed children to age 15.

Question 96

outline what research has found about the effects of institutionalisation

Answer 96

disinhibited attachment is strongly assosciated with institutional rearing if not adopted before 6 months

in rutters study most children showed signs of mental retardation however most of the children adopted before 6 months caught up to the control grouo by the age of 4

Question 97

how do early attachments influence later relationships according to the internal working model

Answer 97

according to bowlby’s internal working model it is a Mental representation we carry with us of our attachment to our primary caregiver. They affect future relationships because they carry perception of what relationships are like.

Question 98

how do the different attachment types influence later childhood

Answer 98

Securely attached children form the best quality friendships.

Insecure children have friendship difficulties.

Myron-Wilson and Smith (1998) -secure children were unlikely be involved in bullying,

insecure-avoidant were most likely to be victims of bulling and

insecure-resistant were most likely to be bullies.

Question 99

outline Hazan and shaver’s study into investigae if the primary attachment relationship with parents is reflected in adult relationships.

Answer 99

620 people measured a love quiz published in a local newspaper

the questionaire was designed to establish the type of attachment people had with their parents and the types of relationships as adults

A positive correlation was found between attachment type and love experiences.
Securely attached adults described their love experiences as happy, friendly and trusting.

The avoidant respondents tended to reveal jealousy and fear of intimacy.

Question 100

how do early attachment types influence later parenting types

Answer 100

People base their parenting style on their internal working model so attachment type tends to be passed through generations of a family.

Question 101

outline one limitation of the influence of early attachment on later relationships- validity issues

Answer 101

most studies rely on self report techniques e.g hazen and shavers studies questionaires. relies on participantss being honest and having realistic views. it also causes problems retrospectively - looking back at ur own childhood attachment relies on accurate recollections

Question 102

outline one limitation of the influence of early attachment on later relationships - association is not the same as causation

Answer 102

there are alternative explanations for teh continuity that often exists between infants ans later relationships , environmental factors may have a direct effect on future relationships or attachment. e.g a childs temperment and parenting style could have a effect . LImitation as it goes against bowlbys idea that an internal working model caused these outcomes.

Question 103

outline one limitation of the influence of early attachmenr on later relationships - theoretical problems related to internal working model

Answer 103

internal working models are unconscious , we are not directlly aware of their influence on us. when participants self report they are relying on their conscious understanding of those relationships.