4) Stone-Weierstrass theorem Flashcards
intro stone-weierstrass thm
In the original and
most known form says that any continuous function on a compact interval can be uniformly
approximated by a sequence of polynomials. Polynomials have many nice properties which
make this dense subset particularly useful: easy computation, derivation and integration, etc.
Yet, we will prove here a more general version of the Stone–Weierstrass theorem that applies
to general compact metric spaces
This is an interestingly sounding theorem: it states that a subset of C(X, R) which is closed under algebraic operations and separates points automatically has topological property—it is dense. Its consequences are striking. Before we prove this theorem let’s look at some of them
Thm 4.1 (Stone–Weierstrass).
Suppose that X is a compact metric space and let C(X, R) be the Banach space of real valued continuous functions on X with norm ∥·∥∞.
Suppose that A ⊂ C(X, R) is a unital subalgebra of C(X, R), i.e.
* A is a linear subspace,
* 1 ∈ A,
* A · A ⊂ A, or in other words f, g ∈ A implies that also f · g ∈ A.
Suppose furthermore that A separates points, i.e. for any two x, y ∈ X with x ≠ y there
exists a function f ∈ A such that f(x)≠ f(y). Then, A is dense in C(X, R). (If A is dense then for any nhd of arbitrary size we can approx with arbirtrary precision)
stone weirstrass more info
two seemingly unrelated properties?
We are saying that A is algebra-property closed under multiplication + (algebraic identities)
We are saying about the approx: elements are becoming closer (inequalities)
continuous and compactness help this bridge
separates points means
we can distinguish any two points on the interval
so for any two points in x,y X that arent equal there is a funcition st f(x) is noit f(y)
Corollary 4.2. [Weierstrass approximation theorem]
The space of polynomials R[x] is
dense in C([a, b], R) for any compact interval [a, b] in the in the ∥ · ∥∞ norm.
In other words, any continuous function can be approximated with arbitrary accuracy by a
polynomial in the supremum norm
e.g. consider any complicated continuous function on [a,b] an approximation p(x) = Σa_k x^k
gives a function that is within a distance Ɛ
)
why we aproximate Weirstrass
(we are considering polynomials to be integrated, if we wish to integrate a continuous function we approximate by polynomials
polynomials form a unital algebra
sum of polynomials polynomial
multiply two polynomials gives polynomals
Corollary 4.3. The space of polynomials is dense in…
extended to compact set of R^n
The space of polynomials R[x1, . . . , xn] is dense in C(K, R) for any
compact subset K of R^n
in the ∥ · ∥∞ norm.
we need domain to be compact
(This is the higher dimensional version of the above theorem and states that a continuous
functions of n-variables can be approximated by polynomials in n variables.)
Corollary 4.4. finite linear span related to trigonometric polynomials stone-weir
Let C(S^1, R) be the space of continuous functions on the unit circle, or, equivalently, the space of 2π-periodic real valued functions on R. Then the finite linear
span of the set
∪_m∈N {1,sin(mx), cos(mx)} is dense in C(S^1, R).
(we have collection as vector space function = 1 in our set and is closed under multiplication)
Why are trig functions forming linear space
cos(nx)*sin(mx)
= 0.5(sin(n+m)x)-sin(n-m)
sin(A+B) = sinA *cosB +cosAsinB
consider a continuous function defined on C[-pi,pi]
we can approx using trig functions
diagram: oscillating trig functions
f ∧ g
f ∧ g = min{f, g},
f ∨ g = max{f, g}
Note that of f and g are continuous, then so are f ∧ g and f ∨ g (demonstrate this!)
diagram:
consider 2 functions, max takes all the max parts from the two
a function itself, continuous and will still be a function from our set (stones)
Theorem 4.5 (Stone’s Theorem
. Let X be a compact metric space and suppose that
there is a subset A of C(X, R) such that
1) A is closed under the operations ∧ and ∨, this means f, g ∈ A implies f ∧ g ∈ A and f ∨ g ∈ A.
2) for any pair of points x ≠ y and numbers a, b ∈ R there is a function f ∈ A such that f(x) = a and f(y) = b.
Then, A is dense in C(X, R) in the topology induced by the norm ∥ · ∥∞ (the uniform topology)
Corollary 4.6. [Stone–Weierstrass (complex version)]
Suppose that X is a compact
metric space and let C(X, C) be the complex Banach space of complex valued continuous functions on X with norm ∥ · ∥∞. Suppose that A ⊂ C(X, C) is a unital ∗-subalgebra
of C(X, C), i.e.
* A is a linear subspace,
* 1 ∈ A,
* A · A ⊂ A, or in other words f, g ∈ A implies that also f · g ∈ A.
* if f ∈ A the also overline(f) ∈ A.
Suppose furthermore that A separates points, i.e. for any two x, y ∈ X with x ≠ y there
exists a function f ∈ A such that f(x) ≠ f(y). Then, A is dense in C(X, C).
(complex conjugation: for complex numbers |z|= srt(Z*overline(Z))
constructed as collection of polynomials if you take bounded functions not continuous then not seperable so useful if continuous functions we can approximate all sets
corollary 4.7 using complex version and e Euler identity e^iϕ = cos ϕ + isin ϕ
The linear span of the set {e
imφ | m ∈ Z} is dense in C(S^1, C)
Note that we need both positive and negative values of m in e^imφ, the set {e^imφ | m ∈ N0} is
not dense in C(S^1, C).