4. International Organisations Flashcards

1
Q

def of a state

A

State: Political community with permanent population, defined territory, government with monopoly of force and capacity to enter into relations with other states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

def of Intergovernmental Organisation

A

Intergovernmental Organisation: members are states and made up of three or more states. IGOs are established by intergovernmental agreement/treaty. It has a permanent secretariat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

def of transnational organisations

A

Transnational Organisation: made up of private actors (e.g. transnational corporations, religious movements, NGOs, epistemic communities, social movements)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

def international institution

A

International Institution: synonymous with international organization. The UN, IMF, and WTO, for example, are commonly referred to as either. However, they are also Set of implicit or explicit principles, norms, rules and decision-making procedures around which actors’ expectations converge in a given area of IR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

def of IR

A

International Relations: Structural formal contacts between governments through bilateral and multilateral diplomaticrelations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

def of transgovernmental relations

A

Transgovernmental Relations: Structural informal contacts between(representatives of) ministries, parliaments and other governmentalbodies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

def of transnational relations

A

Transnational Relations: Structural contacts between private actors across state borders NGO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

def multinational corporations

A

Multinational corporations (MNCs): companies that have operations in more than one country. They will have their headquarters in just one country (the ‘home’ country) but will either manage production or deliver services in other countries (‘host’ countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

why are IOs important?

A

*they survive and have endured in the international system.
*They shape how states respond to international problems.
*They increasingly affect the lives of individuals everywhere by shaping the distribution of power and making policies that were previously left to states.
*help states create global public goods by being forums for international cooperation and then helping to enact and enforce the provision of those goods.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are the big steps of the Brief History of Intergovernmental Organizations

A

*1648: Treaties of Westpalia
* Emergence of Modern IOs in the 19th Century
*Political IOs and the Role of Diplomacy
*the league of Nations after WW1
*The Rise of Modern IOs Post-WWII

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

explain 1648 as the first step of the history of IOs

A

treaties of Westphalia (end the 30 years war in Eu):
*established state sovereignty (states were recognized as having authority over their own territory).
*This concept laid the groundwork for modern international relations and later, intergovernmental organizations (IGOs).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

explain the Emergence of Modern IOs in the 19th Century as the first step of the history of IOs

A

19th= rise of early forms of IOs focused on specific areas of cooperation:
*Health: International Sanitary Conferences (1851) to combat disease.
*Trade & Transport: International Maritime Organization (precursors in 19th C.).
*Communication: International Telegraph Union (1865) – Now the International Telecommunications Union (ITU).
+ Universal Postal Union (1874) – Standardized global mail services.

-> These organizations were apolitical, focusing on technical and administrative cooperation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain Political IOs and the role of diplomacy as the first step of the history of IOs

A

*Diplomacy by Conference: idea that states should regularly meet to discuss international issues became a norm.
*Concert of Europe (1815-1914):
A multilateral forum where European powers met to maintain peace.
Aimed at preventing large-scale wars through diplomacy.
*The Hague System (1899, 1907):
Early efforts to codify international law and arbitration + Established mechanisms for resolving disputes peacefully.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

explain creation of the league of nations as the first steps of the history of IOs

A

*1919 after WWI as the first global political IO.
*Aimed to prevent future wars through collective security and diplomacy.
*Included the establishment of the Permanent Court of International Justice (precursor to today’s ICJ).
*failed to prevent WWII due to lack of enforcement mechanisms and U.S. non-membership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain rise of modern IOs as the first steps of the history of IOs

A

After WWII, many of today’s most powerful IOs were created:
*UN (1945) – Successor to the League, focusing on peace, security, and global cooperation.
*International Monetary Fund (IMF) & World Bank (1944) – Economic governance.
*World Health Organization (WHO) (1948) – Global health coordination.
*North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) (1949) – Collective security.

-> These IOs reflected a shift toward institutionalized global governance, shaping international relations today.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

diff btwn international organisations (IOs) and intergovernmental organisation (IGOs)
-> def; membership; example; legal basis; decision-making

A

-definition:
Broad term for any organization that operates internationally (IOs)
vS A specific type of IO formed by sovereign states through treaties or agreements.(IGOs)
-Membership:
Can include states, non-state actors (NGOs, MNCs, individuals)(IOs)
vS Comprised only of sovereign states (governments).(IGOs)
-Examples: Amnesty International vS NATO
-Legal Basis:
Can be private or non-governmental; not necessarily created by treaties (IOs).
vS Created by formal treaties between governments, giving them legal authority (IGOs)
-Decision-Making:
Often voluntary and advisory, no binding authority over states (IOs)
vS Binding agreements and policies; states must follow rules set by the organization.(IGOs)

17
Q

why do states create/ join international institutions?

A

●To bridge the tension between individual and collectiveinterests
●Pursue common interests
●Coordinate their actions
●Pool resources
●Facilitate regular communication
●Share and generate information
●Monitor one another
●To gain legitimacy for their actions
●Symbolic value
●To adjudicate disputes
●To ‘tie-in’ and illustrate domestic commitments (signal their commitment to domestic policies or reforms-> When a government makes promises to economic, social, or political reforms, joining an international institution reinforces credibility)
●To ‘lock-in’ the international spoils of victory (After winning a war, negotiation, or major political/economic advantage, a state may create or join an institution to secure its gains)

18
Q

how has the UN evolve over time?

A

UN established to maintain international peace, and promote human rights and international economic and social cooperation
○Since then, remit has expanded enormously (e.g. health, environment, development, much broader concept of ‘humansecurity’)

19
Q

how has NATO evolve over time?

A

NATO established 1949) to deter Soviet aggression
○Post-Cold War remit includes peacekeeping, military interventions, anti-piracy missions. Rather than decline or die, NATO expanded after Cold War ended

20
Q

what are the different types of IO?

A

●Many ways to categorise IOs (e.g. according to membership, size, issue area, powers, region, function, global/regional, governmental/non-governmental, intergovernmental/supranational)
●In practice, most IOs fit into more than one category (e.g. the UN as an intergovernmental/ transnational IO)
●Typology, and definitions generally, are important because how we define and categorise IOs can influence how we analyse them

21
Q

what is the structure of IGOs?

A

●A founding treaty in which institutional structure, principles, functions and commitments are outlined (e.g. Treaty on European Union)
●Assembly (e.g. UN General Assembly)
●Council (e.g. AU Executive Council, UNSC)
●Secretariat (e.g. EU Council Secretariat)
●Sometimes, IGOs can also have parliaments, courts, organs for dealing with specific policy areas or that represent particular interests

22
Q

If IOs have autonomy and authority in the world, what do they do with it?

A

○Classify the world, creating categories of actors and actions Ex: Consider the evolving definition of “refugee“ “migrant” “guest worker” “exiles” and the role of UNHCR catagory
○Fix meanings in the social world Ex: What is security? Development?
○Articulate and diffuse new norms EX:Consider decolonization & the role of The UN Charter

23
Q

what are the Three views on IOs

A

they can function as actor, forum, resource

24
Q

explain IOs as an actor

A

-> IOs are independent entities created by international law, separate from the states that establish and govern them.

-> How They Function as Actors:
*Legal & Political Recognition:
To be considered an actor, an IO must be recognized by the international community as an independent entity.
Ex: UN is recognized as an actor because it has its own rights, duties, and legal status.
*Capacity for Action: actor if its decisions have an impact on global affairs.
Ex: WHO acted independently during the COVID-19 pandemic by coordinating global health responses, issuing travel advisories, and setting health policies.
*Separation from Member States: act in ways that states might not fully control.
Ex: ICC prosecutes individuals for war crimes, even if powerful states oppose its decisions.
-> IOs as actors have their own legal personality, independent decision-making capacity, and impact on international affairs.

25
explain IOs as forums
-> IOs serve as meeting places where states and other actors come together to discuss, negotiate, and resolve international issues. -> How They Function as Forums *Physical & Institutional Spaces: locations, infrastructure, and schedules for discussions. Ex: UN Headquarters in New York hosts annual General Assembly meetings *Platform for Diplomacy: IOs as places to communicate, negotiate, and set international norms. Ex: WTO holds trade negotiations between countries, allowing them to settle disputes *Continuation of Historical Practices: concept of IOs as forums originated from 19th-century European conferences, like: -Geneva Conventions (1864–1949) → Set rules for war and humanitarian protection. -League of Nations conferences → resolve international disputes diplomatically. -The Rio Earth Summit (1992) → Set international environmental goals. -The Paris Climate Agreement (2015) → Negotiated global commitments to combat climate change. ->: IOs as forums facilitate diplomacy, host negotiations, and institutionalize global discussions on key international issues.
26
explain IOs as resources
-> tools that states and other actors use to advance their political, economic, or strategic interests. -> How They Function as Resources: *IOs Provide Legitimacy: States use IO statements, resolutions, and rulings to justify their own policies. Ex: The U.S. cited UN resolutions to justify military actions in Iraq *Competing Interpretations of IO Actions: Countries debate what IO decisions mean and how they should be applied. Ex: Different countries interpret UN resolutions on Palestine in opposing ways to support their own policies. *Struggles Over IO Influence: Powerful states try to shape IO decisions in their favor. Ex: The IMF and WB *IOs as Political Battlegrounds: States use IOs to fight for influence over global norms and rules. Ex: The debate over WHO’s handling of COVID-19 became politicized, with the U.S. accusing it of bias towards China -> IOs as resources help states justify policies, influence global rules, and serve as tools for international power struggles.
27
show how the UN is both an actor, a resource and a forum
As an actor: The UN deploys peacekeepers and enforces sanctions. As a forum: The UN General Assembly hosts global debates and resolutions. As a resource: States use UN rulings and reports to legitimize their policies.
28
what are the theorical perspectives of IOs
Different schools of thought offer competing explanations for the role and significance of IOs in global politics. --> The primary debates revolve around liberalist theories (Functionalism, Neofunctionalism, and Institutionalism) and realist perspectives.
29
what say the liberal theories on IOs (in general)
generally view IOs as tools for cooperation, peace, and prosperity: IOs facilitate collective action and help states overcome challenges such as trade barriers, conflict resolution, and transaction costs.
30
explain functionism as a liberal theory on IOs
Functionalism: IOs exist to ensure individual prosperity and freedom by facilitating cooperation in practical matters (e.g., trade, communication, health). *Purpose of IOs: _To enhance prosperity by standardizing procedures across states (e.g., trade regulations). _To promote international peace by fostering permanent cooperation among states. _Ex: The Universal Postal Union (UPU) (established in 1874) created uniform global postal standards, showing that cooperation in technical and non-political matters could lead to broader international stability. *Criticism: Realists criticized functionalism as too idealistic, arguing that technical cooperation would not prevent conflict in "high politics" areas like security and military strategy
31
explain neofunctionalism as a liberal theory on IOs
Neofunctionalism (1950s–Present): IOs can drive political integration beyond just economic or technical cooperation. *Spillover Effect: Cooperation in one area (e.g., coal and steel production) can expand into other areas (e.g., political and monetary union). *Role of International Bureaucrats: IO officials (e.g., EU bureaucrats) can push for deeper cooperation by shaping policy and influencing states. *Example: ECSC (1951): Created to regulate coal and steel (key war materials) in post-WWII Europe. Later expanded into the EEC and ultimately the EU. *Criticism: Integration does not always work beyond specific regions (e.g., failure of Latin American regionalism compared to Europe). -> States often resist deeper political integration despite economic cooperation.
32
explain neoliberal institutionalism as a liberal theory on IOs
Neoliberal Institutionalism (1980s–Present): IOs help states maximize benefits and overcome barriers to cooperation by reducing costs, improving information-sharing, and ensuring compliance. *States Join IOs to Gain Benefits: -IOs help reduce transaction costs and facilitate cooperation on shared issues. -They provide legal frameworks and dispute resolution mechanisms (e.g., WTO resolving trade disputes). *Main Argument: -IOs do not replace states but make cooperation easier and more stable. -If IOs prevent states from defecting, they remain effective. *Example: WTO helps states resolve disputes without resorting to trade wars. *Criticism: -States may abandon cooperation if short-term benefits outweigh long-term institutional stability. -Power dynamics still favor stronger states, who can manipulate IOs to their advantage.
33
what are the realist theories on IOs?
reject the optimistic view of IOs in liberal theory + argue that states remain the primary actors in IP and that IOs are simply tools for state power. classical realism and neorealism
34
explain classical realism as a realist theory on IOs
-IOs provide a platform for diplomacy but do not fundamentally change state behavior. -States use IOs to pursue national interests. -IOs provide a space for negotiation but cannot enforce peace. Ex:The League of Nations (1919–1946) failed to prevent WWII because it lacked enforcement power.
35
explain neorealism as a realist theory on IOs
IOs reflect the interests of powerful states, not neutral platforms for cooperation. -IOs as Extensions of Power Politics: embody the "rules of the game" set by dominant states. Ex: The UN Security Council gives permanent seats and veto power to the WWII victors -Lock-in Effect: Powerful states design IOs to maintain their advantages (e.g., U.S. dominance in the IMF and World Bank). -Cooperation is Self-Interested: States only participate in IOs if they gain relative advantages over others. Criticism: ¨Realists minimize how institutions shape behavior over time. ¨Not all IOs serve great power interests; some facilitate collective action for mutual benefit.
36
explain the persistent questions that remain abt the role and effectiveness of IOs : Do IOs matter (give pov of realists and liberals)? Can IOs become dysfunctional? Are IOs unaccountable? How should IOs be analyzed? Which perspective is more useful—economic or sociological? Is a priori theorising (un)helpful?
Do IOs matter? L: Yes, promote peace and cooperation. R: No, states remain dominant. Can IOs become dysfunctional? Yes: bureaucratic inefficiency, corruption, or great power manipulation Are IOs unaccountable? sometimes act without sufficient oversight, raising concerns about legitimacy. How should IOs be analyzed? "Outside-in" → Focus on state behavior and external influences on IOs. "Inside-out" → Study the internal workings of IOs, such as bureaucratic processes. Which perspective is more useful—economic or sociological? Economic → IOs help maximize utility and efficiency. Sociological → IOs shape norms, identities, and collective expectations.
37
def regime
according to Krassner: not necessarily formal institutions or organizations, but rather frameworks of rules and norms that guide state behavior in specific issue areas—like trade, security, or the environment.