4 - Directors' Duties and Responsibilities Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the role of a director of a company?

A
  • As a company is inanimate, it is the directors who on a day-to-day basis are responsible for managing the company through an agency relationship.
  • The directors are accountable to the company itself rather than to the shareholders directly.
  • Certain actions, however, can only be taken by Directors if the shareholders have given authority.
  • Directors owe their duties to the company.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the key characteristics of shareholders of a company?

A
  • Own the company.
  • Are able to control key decisions through shareholder resolutions, e.g., give directors authority to change the name of the company.

It is common for directors and shareholders to be the same people in a company.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the authority of directors to manage a company in comparison to that of a shareholder?

A

Under CA 2006, certain key decisions require shareholder approval, such as:
- Changing the company’s name (unless provided otherwise by the articles).
- Amending the articles of association.
- Removing directors.

The board of directors, under MA 3, is generally free to manage and make decisions on behalf of the company without shareholder approval for other matters. This includes:
- Employing individuals (excluding directors on long-term service contracts) and setting their pay.
- Entering into contracts with customers and suppliers.
- Buying and selling company property.
- Raising funds by borrowing from banks and using the company’s assets as security.
- Preparing company accounts and providing information to auditors.

MA 5 allows the board to delegate decision-making to a specific director or a committee, such as a HR Director for HR matters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the accountability of directors?

A

Directors are given wide powers, but without regulation, these powers could be abused (e.g., lending company funds to themselves or giving misleading statements in accounts).

To prevent unethical practices and protect shareholders and creditors, directors’ actions are regulated by statute, particularly Part 10 of CA 2006, which outlines their general duties.

Directors can be held accountable for wrongdoing through:
Civil and criminal actions for breaching the Companies Act.
Criminal liability under other legislation, including:
- Fraud Act 2006 (fraud).
- Theft Act 1968 (theft).
- Criminal Justice Act 1993 (insider dealing).
- Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (money laundering).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a director?

A

CA 2006 does not explicitly define “director,” but under s 250 CA 2006, it includes “any person occupying the position of director, by whatever name called.”
Categories of directors include:
At law:
- De jure directors.
- De facto directors.
- Shadow directors.

In practice:
- Executive directors.
- Non-executive directors.

A company’s articles may also provide for alternate directors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are de jure and de facto directors?

A
  • A de jure director is one who has been validly appointed according to the law.
  • De facto directors are individuals who act as directors but have not been validly appointed. E.g., provide advice to the company acting as if they are a director. Fiduciary duties and liabilities apply equally to de facto directors as they do to de jure directors.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the rules required for the number of directors in a private or public limited company?

A

Private limited companies: At least one director is required (s 154 CA 2006).

Public limited companies: At least two directors are required (s 154 CA 2006).

Every company must have at least one director who is a natural person (s 155(1) CA 2006).

CA 2006 does not set a maximum number of directors, but a company may include a maximum limit in its articles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the rules on who can be appointed as a director?

A
  • A person must be at least 16 years old to be appointed as a director (s 157 CA 2006).
  • As of 4 March 2024, under the ECCTA amendment to CA 2006, a person who is disqualified under director disqualification legislation cannot be appointed as a director unless they have the permission of the court.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are shadow directors?

A
  • A shadow director is defined under s 251(1) CA 2006 as a person whose directions or instructions the company’s directors are accustomed to follow.
  • s 251(2) excludes professional advisers from being classified as shadow directors.

This provision ensures that individuals acting as directors, even if not formally appointed, are subject to the same duties and restrictions as directors. This applies to shadow directors under various provisions of CA 2006 and the Insolvency Act 1986.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are executive and non-executive directors?

A

Executive directors:
Appointed to executive office, often spending most or all of their working time on company business.
They are both officers and employees of the company (e.g., Finance Director, Managing Director).

Non-executive directors:
Officers of the company but not employees.
Do not engage in the day-to-day running of the company, instead offering independent guidance and advice to the board and protecting the interests of shareholders.

Both types of directors are subject to the same duties under CA 2006.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are alternate directors?

A
  • An alternate director is a person who acts as a substitute for an absent director, typically appointed by the board or fellow directors.
  • The Model Articles (MA) do not provide for alternate directors, but some companies include provisions for this in their articles.
  • The alternate director possesses the same voting powers as the absent director.
  • It is generally accepted that CA 2006 applies to alternate directors, including the duties of directors.

The use of these directors is increasingly rare due to the ability to now conduct Board Meetings online.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a company secretary and what are their main duties?

A

A company secretary is responsible for:
- Keeping company records up-to-date.
- Producing minutes of board and general meetings.
- Ensuring that filings are made at Companies House.

Private companies are not required to have a company secretary under s 270(1) CA 2006, unless stated in their articles.
Public companies must appoint a company secretary (s 271 CA 2006).

A public company’s secretary must possess the necessary knowledge, experience, and qualifications (s 273(2) CA 2006), such as being a solicitor or chartered accountant. It is for the directors to ensure that the company secretary has the requisite qualifications.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How is the appointment of directors dealt with by companies and the Model Articles (MA)?

A

The Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) does not provide a specific procedure for the appointment of directors; this is governed by the Articles of the company.

The Model Articles (MA) allow for two methods of appointing directors:
- By ordinary resolution of the shareholders (MA 17(1)(a)).
- By a decision of the directors (MA 17(1)(b)).
It is more common for the board of directors to appoint new directors under MA 17(1)(b), as this is simpler to implement.

The Articles of a company may include custom provisions for the appointment of directors, so it is essential to review them before advising on this matter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the service contracts of directors?

A

An executive director is an employee of the company and must be provided with a written contract of employment (service contract), which outlines:
- Duties
- Remuneration package
- Notice provisions

Directors are not automatically entitled to payment for their services. The board determines remuneration, subject to the company’s Articles.

The company must keep directors’ service contracts (or memoranda of their terms) at its registered office for inspection by the members (s 228 CA 2006).

Under Article 19 MA, the terms of a director’s service contract, including remuneration, are for the board to decide.

Shareholder approval is required for long-term service contracts under s 188 CA 2006.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How is the disclosure of the identity of directors and the secretary dealt with?

A

The CA 2006 requires certain information about directors and the secretary to be disclosed publicly or to the members.

Every company must:
- Maintain a register of directors (s 162(1) CA 2006) and the secretary (s 275(1) CA 2006).
- Notify the Registrar of Companies (Companies House) of changes to directors (s 167 CA 2006) and the secretary (s 276 CA 2006).
The register must be kept at the company’s registered office and be available for inspection.

Certain details must be filed with Companies House using appropriate forms (e.g., AP01 for the appointment of a director).
The information is available to the public for inspection (s 1085(1) CA 2006).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the provisions for privacy for officers of the company?

A

The CA 2006 allows more confidentiality for directors and the secretary compared to previous legislation.

Section 163(1) CA 2006 specifies that the register of directors must include:
- Name and any former names
- Service address
- Country or state of residence
- Nationality
- Business occupation (if any)
- Date of birth

For secretaries, s 277(1) CA 2006 requires:
- Name and any former names
- Address (which can be a service address, such as the company’s registered office or residential address if there are no issues with privacy for the secretary).
- Directors still need to provide their residential address (s 165 CA 2006), but this is kept on a separate, secure register not available for public inspection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What disclosure is required in annual accounts regarding directors?

A

Section 412 CA 2006 governs the disclosure of information about directors’ remuneration in a company’s annual accounts. This includes:
- Salaries, bonus payments, and pension entitlements.
- Compensation for loss of office.

Details of payments made to persons connected with directors or companies controlled by directors must also be disclosed.

Section 413 CA 2006 requires information on advances, credits, and guarantees provided by the company to directors to be disclosed, applying to any person who was a director during the relevant financial year.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How can shareholders remove a director?

A

Section 168(1) CA 2006 allows shareholders to remove a director by passing an ordinary resolution.
A special notice (28 days) is required for such a resolution under s 168(2) CA 2006.
The board of directors cannot remove a director unless the Articles specifically permit it.
Directors who are also shareholders may vote on their own removal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the ways in which a director may vacate their office?

A

A director can vacate their office through:
- Resignation: A director may resign by giving notice, as provided for in MA 18(f).

Automatic termination under MA 18 occurs if:
- The director becomes disqualified.
- The director becomes bankrupt or subject to an individual voluntary arrangement.
- A medical practitioner certifies that the director is physically or mentally incapable of performing their duties for more than three months.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the Company Directors Disqualification Act (CDDA) and what does it provide for?

A

The Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 (CDDA) governs the disqualification of directors.

  • Courts can issue disqualification orders preventing individuals from acting as directors, liquidators, or in any other role in company management without court permission.
  • Disqualification is imposed to protect the public and can last for up to 15 years.
  • Grounds for disqualification include fraudulent or wrongful trading and persistent breaches of company law.
  • Acting in violation of a disqualification order is a criminal offence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is retirement by rotation and the requirements for reappointment?

A

The model articles for public companies require directors to retire and be reappointed by the members every three years.

All directors of listed companies are subject to annual re-election.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are the Companies House filing requirements when a director leaves office?

A

When a director leaves office, the company must update its register of directors and notify Companies House by filing form TM01 (Termination of appointment of director).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Why are directors subject to extensive duties?

A

Directors are responsible for the day-to-day management of the company (MA 3).
To protect shareholders and creditors from directors exploiting or abusing their powers for personal gain, directors are subject to extensive duties.
Whenever directors make decisions, they must consider all the duties to which they are subject.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Who are the general duties of directors owed to?

A
  • The general duties of directors are owed to the company, not to shareholders directly.
  • A breach of duty by a director is a wrong done to the company, making the company the claimant in any proceedings in the event of a breach by director.
  • When a company faces financial difficulty, the directors’ duties shift towards protecting creditors.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Provide an overview of the general duties of directors as set out in ss170-177 CA 2006.

A

The general duties of directors, codified in CA 2006, are drawn from common law and equity.

Sections 170-177 CA 2006 set out the statutory general duties:
- s 171: Duty to act within powers
- s 172: Duty to promote the success of the company for the benefit of members as a whole
- s173: Duty to exercise independent judgment
- s 174: Duty to exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence
- s 175: Duty to avoid conflicts of interest
- s 176: Duty not to accept benefits from third parties
- s 177: Duty to declare any interest in a proposed transaction

These duties apply to all types of directors and are interpreted according to the common law rules and equitable principles (s 170(4) CA 2006).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What does the duty to act within powers under s171 CA 2006 entail?

A

Section 171 outlines two separate duties:

  1. Duty to act within the company’s constitution:
    The constitution includes the company’s articles of association and decisions taken in accordance with those articles (s 257 CA 2006).
    A breach occurs if a director acts without authority (e.g., committing the company to borrow more than allowed without shareholder approval).
  2. Duty to exercise powers for the purposes for which they are conferred:
    Directors must not use their powers for improper purposes, such as personal gain.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is the duty to promote the success of the company under s172 CA 2006?

A

Section 172 CA 2006 codifies the duty for directors to act in a way they believe, in good faith, will most likely promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole.

The government interprets ‘success’ for commercial companies as a ‘long-term increase in value’.

Directors must also consider non-exhaustive factors such as the long-term consequences of decisions, employees’ interests, relationships with suppliers, customers, and others, environmental impacts, and maintaining high business standards when making decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What are the factors listed under the duty to promote the success of the company in s172 CA 2006?

A

In fulfilling their duty to promote the success of the company, directors must have regard to the following factors (non-exhaustive) under s 172(1) CA 2006:
- Long-term consequences of decisions
- Employees’ interests
- Relationships with suppliers, customers, and others
- Impact on the community and environment
- Reputation for high business standards
- Need to act fairly between members of the company

29
Q

What is meant by ‘enlightened shareholder value’, and can you provide an example?

A

Enlightened shareholder value is a ‘middle way’ approach, balancing maximising shareholder profits with considering the interests of other stakeholders.

Example: Directors of WYZ plc are deciding on installing a new oil pipeline. They must consider environmental impacts, as required by s 172(1)(d) CA 2006. However, if promoting the success of the company outweighs the environmental concerns, they may proceed with the project, provided no other stakeholder factors are in conflict.

30
Q

What does compliance with s172 CA 2006 entail?

A
  • Following s 172 CA 2006, directors must document their consideration of the relevant factors in board minutes, especially for significant decisions.
  • Despite fears of increased litigation or excessive record-keeping, companies have adopted a common-sense approach to complying with this duty.

As of January 2019, certain companies, including publicly listed companies, are required to include a s 172 statement in their annual accounts, explaining how they have met the duty.

31
Q

What is the duty to exercise independent judgment under s173 CA 2006?

A

Section 173 CA 2006 requires directors to exercise their powers independently without fettering their discretion, except as allowed by the company’s constitution or prior agreements.
- While directors can rely on advice, they must make their own decisions, ensuring they consider the company’s interests.
- Directors cannot simply follow others’ views without exercising their independent judgment.

32
Q

What is the duty to exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence under s174 CA 2006?

A

The level of care, skill and diligence which a director must exercise is assessed objectively and subjectively.

The duty under s174 CA 2006 requires directors to exercise the care, skill, and diligence that would be expected from:
1. A reasonably diligent person with the general knowledge, skill, and experience that is objectively expected of someone in their role.
2. The general knowledge, skill, and experience specific to that director.

The standard of care may therefore be subjectively raised if a director possesses special knowledge or skills.

33
Q

What is the duty to avoid conflicts of interest under Section 175 CA 2006?

A
  • The duty requires a director to avoid situations where they have, or could have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or may conflict, with the interests of the company.
  • This duty is broadly drafted and specifically applies to the exploitation of any property, information, or opportunity. The fact that the company itself could not have exploited the opportunity is irrelevant.

Example: A director of Company A is offered a directorship at Company B, a competitor. This poses a potential conflict, and the director should seek board approval from both companies or decline the offer.

34
Q

When is the duty to avoid conflicts of interest not infringed under Section 175 CA 2006?

A

The duty is not infringed if:
- The situation cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict.
- The conflict arises from a transaction or arrangement with the company, e.g., a transaction between the director and the company (s 175(3)).
- The conflict has been authorised by the directors (s 175(4)(b)).

Example (s 175(3) exception): A director of Company A is also a director of Company B, following board approval. If Company B later sells an asset to Company A, this is an exception under s 175(3). The director must disclose their interest under s 177, but the transaction is not prohibited.

35
Q

What is the duty not to accept benefits from third parties under Section 176 CA 2006?

A
  • A director must not accept any benefit from a third party that is conferred due to their role as a director or in relation to actions taken (or not taken) as a director.
  • The duty is not breached if the benefit cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict of interest (s 176(4)).

Example: A director accepting a bribe or making a profit at the company’s expense would breach this duty. This conflict of interest is clear and impermissible.

Note: Unlike the duty under s 175, this duty cannot be authorised by the directors. However, shareholders may approve the benefit in advance or ratify it under s 239.

36
Q

What is the duty to declare an interest in a proposed transaction under Section 177 CA 2006?

A
  • A director must declare the nature and extent of any direct or indirect interest in a proposed transaction with the company.
  • This is required for transparency and applies even if the interest is indirect (e.g., through a family member or another entity).

Example: A director of Company A is also a shareholder in Company B, which is entering into a contract with Company A. The director must disclose their interest before Company A signs the contract, even if they are not directly involved in the transaction.

37
Q

What are the procedural matters relating to s 177 CA 2006 regarding disclosing interest?

A
  • The declaration must be made before the company enters into the transaction (s 177(4)).
  • The declaration can be made at a board meeting or in writing (s 177(2)).
  • A one-off general notice can be given if the director is always to be considered interested in transactions with a specific party (s 185).
  • If the declaration is made in writing, it must be sent to all directors either electronically or in paper form (s 184).

Best practice: The director should declare the interest at the first board meeting (BM1) for clarity and documentation.

38
Q

When does a director not need to make a declaration under s 177 CA 2006?

A

A declaration is not required when:
- The director is unaware of the interest or transaction (although a director is treated as aware if they ought to have known).
- The interest cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict.
- The other directors already know or ought to know of the interest.
- The conflict arises from the director’s service contract and has been considered by the board.

Note: In practice, directors are likely to continue making declarations even if other directors are aware to ensure transparency.

39
Q

What does Section 177 CA 2006 and MA 14 cover?

A

MA 14 prohibits a director with an interest in a transaction from voting or counting in the quorum for board resolutions relating to that transaction.

However, this can be relaxed in certain circumstances:
- If the company disapplies MA 14(1) by ordinary resolution.
- If the interest cannot reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict.
If the conflict arises from a permitted cause under MA 14(4).
- Alternatively, the company can amend its articles to allow interested directors to vote and count in the quorum for such matters under s 21 CA 2006.

40
Q

What are the remedies for breach of directors’ duties under Section 178 CA 2006?

A

Directors owe their duties to the company, not to individual shareholders. If directors breach their duties, the company can bring a claim against them.

Remedies for breach include:
- Injunction.
- Setting aside the transaction.
- Restitution or account of profits.
- Restoration of company property.
- Damages (for breach of the duty of care, skill, and diligence under s 174).

Note: These remedies apply as they would for breaches of fiduciary duties under common law and equity.

41
Q

What is shareholder approval in advance under Section 180 CA 2006?

A

Shareholders may approve a director’s proposed action in advance, even if it would otherwise breach their duties under ss 171-177 CA 2006. However, shareholders cannot approve unlawful acts.

Conditions: The directors must fully disclose the relevant facts, allowing shareholders to make an informed decision.

42
Q

What is ratification for breach of duty, and what are the exceptions to this?

A

Shareholders can ratify a director’s breach of duty by ordinary resolution under s 239 CA 2006, provided there is full disclosure and the director does not vote on their own breach.

Ratification applies to:
- Negligence.
- Default.
- Breach of duty.
- Breach of trust.

Exceptions: Unlawful acts and breaches related to insolvency cannot be ratified. Once a company is insolvent, directors owe their duties to creditors, not shareholders.

43
Q

What are the three types of transactions between a company and directors that require shareholder approval under CA 2006?

A

The three types of transactions between a company and its directors (or those connected to them) regulated by the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) and requiring shareholder approval are:
- Directors’ long-term service contracts (ss 188–189 CA 2006).
- Substantial property transactions (ss 190–196 CA 2006).
- Loans, quasi-loans, and credit transactions (ss 197–214 CA 2006).

Reason for shareholder approval: These transactions pose a real risk of conflict between directors’ interests and those of the shareholders. Shareholder approval ensures transparency and accountability, preventing directors from prioritising personal interests over the company’s well-being.

If directors proceed with such transactions without obtaining shareholder approval, they would be in breach of their general duties under sections 171–177 CA 2006, alongside breaching specific regulatory requirements.

44
Q

What is the requirement for shareholder approval regarding directors’ long-term service contracts under s 188 CA 2006?

A

Section 188(2)(a) CA 2006 requires shareholder approval by ordinary resolution for any director’s service contract that guarantees a term exceeding two years.

This “guaranteed term” applies to:
- A period during which the contract is to continue, other than at the company’s instance (i.e., a contractual term of more than two years or where the director controls the duration) (s 188(3)(a)(i)).
- A period in which the company either cannot terminate the contract or can only terminate in specific circumstances (s 188(3)(a)(ii)).
- The notice period the company must give to terminate the contract (s 188(3)(b)).

Example: A director’s contract with a minimum two-year notice period from the company requires shareholder approval.
If the director is also a director of a holding company, shareholder approval must be obtained from the holding company’s shareholders (s 188(2)(b)).

45
Q

What are the consequences of non-compliance with s 188 CA 2006 in relation to directors’ long-term service contracts?

A

If a company agrees to a provision in a director’s service contract that breaches s 188 CA 2006, the following consequences apply under s 189 CA 2006:
- The provision will be void to the extent of the contravention.
- The contract will be deemed to include a term allowing the company to terminate it at any time by giving reasonable notice.

Example: If a director’s contract guarantees employment for 18 months with a nine-month notice period to terminate, this aggregate period exceeds two years, triggering the need for shareholder approval. Failure to comply would result in the contract being void in this respect, and the company could terminate the contract with reasonable notice.

46
Q

What is the exception under s 188(6)(b) CA 2006 regarding shareholder approval?

A

Under s 188(6)(b) CA 2006, shareholder approval is not required for directors’ service contracts in companies that are wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Example: HoldCo Plc owns 100% of the shares in Subsidiary Ltd. If Subsidiary Ltd enters into a new service contract with a guaranteed term of more than two years for one of its directors, approval from the shareholders (i.e., the single SH being HoldCo Plc) is not required, as Subsidiary Ltd is a wholly-owned subsidiary.

47
Q

What disclosures are required under Section 188 CA 2006 regarding directors’ service contracts?

A

While a director is not required to disclose their interest in the service contract under s 177(6)(c) CA 2006, it is still common practice for directors to declare such interests for transparency (s 177(1)).

Additionally:
- The director cannot vote or count in the quorum on any board resolution regarding their own service contract (MA 14(1)).
- Members’ inspection rights: Under s 228 CA 2006, companies must keep copies of all directors’ service contracts (or memoranda of their terms if unwritten) for at least one year after the contract’s termination or expiry. Members have the right to inspect these documents or request copies under s 229 CA 2006.

48
Q

What are the procedural issues related to Section 188 CA 2006 when seeking shareholder approval?

A

Section 188(5)(b) CA 2006 specifies that when seeking shareholder approval via a general meeting (GM), the company must provide a memorandum of the proposed contract for inspection by members:
- At the company’s registered office for at least 15 days before the GM and at the GM itself.

At the GM itself.
- Notice period: A minimum of 15 days’ notice is required for the GM, even under short notice procedures, unless a written resolution is used.
- If a written resolution is being used (s 188(5)(a)), the memorandum of the proposed contract must be sent to every eligible member alongside or before the proposed resolution.

49
Q

What is a substantial property transaction, and which act governs this?

A

A substantial property transaction (SPT) is defined under sections 190–196 of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006).

It refers to a transaction where a director, or a person connected to them, acquires or disposes of a substantial non-cash asset to or from the company. Such transactions are allowed but must be approved by the company’s shareholders through an ordinary resolution.

Key point: Shareholder approval must be obtained either before the transaction is entered into or after, provided the transaction is conditional on approval.

50
Q

What is a substantial non-cash asset?

A

A substantial non-cash asset is any property other than cash, as defined in section 1163 CA 2006.

The definition of “substantial” under s 191 CA 2006 is:
- Assets worth £5,000 or less are not considered substantial.
- Assets worth more than £100,000 are automatically deemed substantial.
- Assets worth between £5,000 and £100,000 are substantial only if they exceed 10% of the company’s net asset value (NAV), which is determined from its most recent statutory accounts.

Example: A property worth £109,000 would be classified as a substantial non-cash asset.

51
Q

What are connected persons under s 252–254 CA 2006?

A

Connected persons are individuals or entities associated with a director, as defined under sections 252–254 CA 2006.
They include:
- Immediate family members, such as spouses, civil partners, parents, and children (but NOT siblings or grandparents).
- Companies in which the director and their connected persons hold at least 20% of the shares.
- Business partners of the director or connected persons.
- Trustees of trusts where the director or connected persons are beneficiaries.

Example: If a director’s wife purchases property from the company, she would be considered a connected person, requiring shareholder approval for the transaction.

52
Q

What is the requirement for holding company SPT’s under s 190(2) CA 2006?

A

Section 190(2) CA 2006 states that if the transaction involves a company and a director of its holding company (or a connected person), approval is required not only from the company but also from the shareholders of the holding company through an ordinary resolution.

Example: Imagine Company A is a holding company, and Company B is its subsidiary. A director of Company A (or a connected person) wants to sell a piece of land to Company B. Under Section 190(2), this transaction would need:
Approval from Company B (the subsidiary);
Approval from the shareholders of Company A (the holding company) via an ordinary resolution.

53
Q

What are the exceptions to approval for substantial property transactions under s 190(4)(b) and s 192 CA 2006?

A

There are two main exceptions where shareholder approval is not required for SPTs:
- Under s 190(4)(b), if the company is a wholly-owned subsidiary, approval from shareholders is not necessary.
- Under s 192 CA 2006, specific transactions, such as those between the company and a director acting in their capacity as a shareholder, are exempt from the requirement for approval.

Example: A director selling their shares back to the company would not require approval, as it falls within the s 192 exception.

54
Q

What are the remedies if a substantial property transaction is entered into without shareholder approval under s 195 CA 2006?

A

If an SPT is entered into without obtaining shareholder approval, the transaction is voidable by the company under s 195(2) CA 2006 unless:

  • Restitution (a remedy that aims to restore to an innocent party the gains that someone else has obtained from them) is no longer possible.
  • The company has been indemnified for the loss suffered.
  • Avoidance would affect rights acquired in good faith by a third party.

Liability: Directors involved are required to account for any profits and indemnify the company for any losses incurred due to the unauthorised transaction.

Remedy: The transaction may still be affirmed by shareholders within a reasonable period, removing its voidable status under s 196 CA 2006.

55
Q

What are the defences available under s 195 CA 2006 for directors involved in an unauthorised substantial property transaction?

A

Under s 195(6) CA 2006, a director is not liable for an unauthorised SPT if they can demonstrate they took all reasonable steps to ensure compliance with s 190 CA 2006.

Additionally, under s 195(7) CA 2006, any director or connected person involved may not be liable if they had no knowledge of the circumstances constituting the contravention.

56
Q

What obligations do directors have regarding disclosure and participation in board decisions for substantial property transactions (s190 and s177 CA 2006)?

A
  • Under s 177(1) CA 2006, a director must disclose the nature and extent of their interest in a proposed substantial property transaction to the board, if they have one.
  • While s 177(6)(b) CA 2006 allows for an exception if all other directors are aware of the interest, it is common practice for directors to still declare the interest to document it in the board minutes.

Voting restriction: Under MA 14(1), a director with an interest in the transaction cannot vote on or count towards the quorum for board resolutions approving the contract.

57
Q

When is shareholder approval required for a substantial property transaction?

A

For the approval requirement under Section 190 to apply, the transaction must involve a director (or a connected person) having an interest in the transaction.

If the transaction does not involve a director or someone connected to the director (such as family members or business associates), Section 190 does not apply, and shareholder approval is not required.

58
Q

What types of loans and transactions are subject to shareholder approval by ordinary resolution under the Companies Act 2006?

A

Shareholder approval by ordinary resolution is required for loans, quasi-loans, credit transactions, guarantees, and the provision of security for loans. These transactions must comply with specific provisions under the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006).

59
Q

Explain the types of transactions that require shareholder approval: loans, quasi-loans, credit transactions, guarantees, or the provision of security.

A

Loans (s 197 CA 2006): A loan involves the company lending money directly to a director. For example, a company lends £50,000 to a director for personal training costs.

Quasi-loans (s 198 CA 2006): A quasi-loan occurs when the company pays a third party on behalf of a director with the expectation that the director will reimburse the company. For example, the company pays off a director’s credit card bill, with the director agreeing to repay later.

Credit transactions (s 201 CA 2006): A credit transaction is where the company supplies goods or services to a director in the normal course of their business on credit terms, such as a building company constructing an extension on a director’s house, with the director paying for it at a later date.

Guarantees or security (s 197 CA 2006): A guarantee or security involves the company guaranteeing or securing a loan made to a director by a third party. For instance, a director borrows £100,000 from a bank, and the company guarantees the repayment.

60
Q

Which companies are restricted by these provisions regarding loans and credit transactions to directors?

A

The restrictions under the CA 2006 apply differently to private companies and public companies, including private companies associated with public companies:

Private companies (not associated with a public company): These companies are subject to fewer restrictions. They only require shareholder approval for loans to directors or the directors of the holding company, and guarantees or securities related to such loans.

Public companies and private companies associated with public companies: These companies are more heavily regulated. They need shareholder approval for loans, quasi-loans, credit transactions, and the provision of guarantees or security for directors, as well as transactions with persons connected to the directors.

The definition of “associated companies” includes subsidiaries of public companies or companies that are subsidiaries of the same corporate body.

61
Q

What types of transactions require shareholder approval for all companies under s 197 CA 2006?

A

Under s 197 CA 2006, all companies (whether public, private, or associated with a plc) must obtain shareholder approval by ordinary resolution for the following types of transactions:
- Loans to directors: For example, a company lending £50,000 to a director for training expenses.
- Guarantees or security for loans to directors: For instance, a company providing security over its assets for a director’s bank loan.

These requirements ensure that shareholders are informed and approve financial assistance provided to directors.

62
Q

What types of transactions require shareholder approval for public companies and private companies associated with public companies?

A

Public companies and private companies associated with public companies must obtain shareholder approval by way of OR for the following types of transactions, in addition to those mentioned under s 197:

Quasi-loans (s 198): For example, the company pays off a director’s bill with the understanding that the director will repay the company later.

Credit transactions (s 201): For instance, the company provides goods or services to a director, with payment to be made at a later date.

Loans and transactions involving connected persons (s 200): This includes loans, quasi-loans, or credit transactions made to individuals connected to the director, such as spouses or children.

63
Q

What are the exceptions to the requirement for shareholder approval in relation to loans?

A

The CA 2006 provides several exceptions where shareholder approval is not required, as outlined in ss 204-209. These include:

  • Expenditure on company business (s 204): Loans up to £50,000 for company-related expenses.
  • Loans for defending proceedings (s 205): Loans to directors to cover legal defence costs.
  • Loans for regulatory actions or investigations (s 206).
  • Minor and business transactions (s 207): Loans up to £10,000 and credit transactions up to £15,000.
  • Intra-group transactions (s 208).
  • Loans by money lending companies (s 209): Where the loan is made as part of the company’s ordinary business.
64
Q

What defences are available when a company enters into an unauthorised transaction with a director or connected person?

A

The CA 2006 provides several defences, including:

Director’s defence (s 213(6)): A director will not be liable if they can show that they took all reasonable steps to ensure the company complied with the approval requirements.

Connected person’s defence (s 213(7)): A connected person (or relevant director) can avoid liability if they had no knowledge of the circumstances constituting the contravention.

65
Q

When does the holding company and wholly-owned subsidiary exemption apply in relation to loans to directors?

A

Holding Company
As with s 190 CA 2006, if the transaction is between a company and a director of the company’s holding company or a person connected to a director of the holding company, the holding company will also need to approve the transaction by OR.

Wholly-owned subsidiary Exemption
As with both ss 188 and 190 CA 2006 approval is not required by the members of any company which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of another company.

66
Q

What disclosures must a director make under s 177 CA 2006 regarding loans and related transactions with the company?

A

Under s 177(1) CA 2006, a director must disclose the nature and extent of their interest in any proposed transaction or arrangement involving loans, quasi-loans, or credit transactions with the company. Even if other directors are aware of the interest, it is best practice for the director to formally declare their interest, which should be documented in the board minutes.

Board participation restrictions: Directors with an interest in the transaction cannot vote on or count towards the quorum for board decisions related to the transaction under MA 14(1).

67
Q

What procedural issues arise under ss 197-201 CA 2006 regarding loans and transactions with directors?

A

When shareholder approval is required for a transaction under ss 197-201 CA 2006, certain procedural requirements must be followed:

  • Memorandum of the transaction: A memorandum outlining the proposed transaction must be available for inspection at the company’s registered office for at least 15 days before the meeting and at the meeting itself.
  • Notice of the meeting: At least 15 days’ notice of the general meeting must be given to shareholders unless the written resolution procedure is used.

Written resolution procedure: This method speeds up the process of approving a loan/related transaction. When it is used, a memorandum of the proposed transaction must be sent to all eligible members at the time the written resolution is distributed.

These procedural rules ensure transparency and give shareholders time to review the transaction before making a decision.

68
Q

Summary of transactions between companies and their directors

A

CA 2006 regulates various transactions between companies and directors, eg:
- Directors’ long-term service contracts (ss 188 – 189)
- Substantial property transactions (ss 190 – 196)
- Loans, quasi-loans and credit transactions (ss 197 – 214).

All of these transactions require the approval of shareholders by way of ordinary resolution unless any of the exceptions apply.

Exception: Note that if a company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of another company, it is exempt from the requirement to obtain shareholder approval.

Remedy: The remedies for breach of the requirements of shareholder approval differ depending on which transaction is involved.

If a company wishes to seek approval for one of these transactions it will need to follow the procedural requirements.