4: Com and action Flashcards
pointing as social actions
- Pointing gestures have a referential and a social element (Tomasello, 2008)
- Talk also has a referential and a social element (e.g., ‘do you have a pen?’)
- People use talk to implement social actions (this idea was introduced in speech act theory; Austin, 1962)
Recipients make sense of someone’s turn by asking themselves ‘what is this doing’?
Actions are sequentially organised (Sacks, Schegloff, & Jefferson, 1974; Schegloff & Sacks, 1973)
- Speakers’ turns come one after the other (because of the ‘one at a time’ rule examined last week)
- Recipients make sense of someone’s turn by relating it to the just previous turn
There is a social expectation that a speaker addresses what has come just before their turn
Actions done through talk form joint activities
Usually, people do not use talk for isolated actions
People use talk to engage with others in joint activities
(Clark, 1996; Levinson, 1992; Schegloff, 2007)
Sequences of action
Sequence = a type of joint activity formed by interconnected actions done by different speakers
initiating action –> Responsive action
starting a sequence: initiating action
REQUEST SEQUENCE: a request invites fulfilment
OFFER SEQUENCE: an offer of information invites acknowledgement and perhaps gratitude
DIRECTIVE SEQUENCE: a directive invites compliance (telling someone what to do)
NOTICING/SHARING SEQUENCE: a sharing invites appreciation
QUESTION-ANSWER SEQUENCE: a yes/no question invites a yes/no response
Sequences in great ape communication (Rossano 2013)
old and young monkey make eye contact - establishes participation framework
wrist-bent gesture implements an action (a carry request)
the request introduces the expectation of a fulfilment (being carried)
Pika et al 2018 - average timing of response
0.2 seconds
suggests evolutionary basis to how we communicate
summary
sequence of 2 actions: initiating and responsive action
first action introduces the expectation of a second action that is collaborative*
*(which collaborate at 2 levels: Structure and stance, aka alignment and affiliation) (Stivers, 2008)
have organised participation frameworks
Different ways of responding to an initiating action
(expanded on in w9)
conversation has rules
can evade a question or answer a different question (politicians)
if the recipient doesn’t respond, person A can pursue an answer
Application: Drew 1992: US assault trial
attorneys use yes/no responses to restrain the victim’s responses
now recognised as a harmful practice leading to 2ndary victimisation
focus is on how victims work to evade the contraints of questions through transformative answers
Missing/ delayed responses
Last week, we learned that silences are made sense of in the context of the one at a time rule for turn taking.
What was missing there is the basis for how silences are treated in the way they are. How they are interpreted depends on their position. The silences we consider here acquire meaning because they follow an initiating action. They thus embody lack of or delaying of a response that is normatively due.
silences have a communicative action
A’s response to silence
with B’s hesitation, A anticipates there might be a decline of the request, so produces a question that may make it easier to decline
Summary: on-time vs delayed-responses
- Rule: people should respond on-time (due to pressure from the rules of participation seen in Week 3)
- Delays and hesitations in responding are therefore a source of meaning: people ask themselves, ‘what is this doing?’
- Delays are sometimes understood as forecasting a response that does not fulfil the project embodied in the initiating action (e.g., declining an invitation)
- So, conversational rules are a source of meaning
Sequence expansions: (schegloff 2007)
- Sequences of actions composed of an initiating and responding action implement projects (something that the initiator is trying to accomplish)
- People use practices to maximise the chances that the project is successful
- We refer to these as sequence expansions
These demonstrate that people track one another’s inferable intentions
Type of sequence expansion 3
pre-expansion (before initiating action)
insert expansion (in between iniating and responding action)
Post-expansion (after responding action)