4 - Characteristics of the Opportunity Set Under Risk Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Frequency Distributions

What are the two measures to capture the relevant information about a frequency function?

A

Frequency Distribution:

  1. A frequency distribution is an overview of:
    1. all distinct values in some variable and
    2. the number of times they occur.
  2. Optionally, a frequency distribution may contain relative frequencies:
    1. frequencies relative to (divided by) the total number of values.
    2. Relative frequencies are often shown as percentages or proportions.
  3. Relative frequencies provide easy insight into frequency distributions. Besides, they facilitate comparisons. For example,
    1. “67.5% of males and 63.2% of females graduated” is much easier to interpret than“79 out of 117 males and 120 out of 190 females graduated”.

Relative Frequencies and Probability

  1. A special type of relative frequency is a probability.
  2. A probability is a relative frequency over infinite trials.
  3. So stating that “a coin flip has a 50% probability of landing heads up” technically means that if we’d flip the coin an infinite number of times, 50% -a relative frequency- of those flips will land heads up.

Two Measures:

  1. one to measure the average value and
  2. one to measure dispersion around the average value
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the central tendency of a frequency distribution?

A

In MPT = Expected Return

  • To calculate the EV for a single discrete random variable, you must multiply the value of the variable by the probability of that value occurring. Take, for example, a normal six-sided die. Once you roll the die, it has an equal one-sixth chance of landing on one, two, three, four, five or six. Given this information, the calculation is straightforward:

(1/6 * 1) + (1/6 * 2) + (1/6 * 3) + (1/6 * 4) + (1/6 * 5) + (1/6 * 6) = 3.5

  • If you were to roll a six-sided die an infinite amount of times, you see the average value equals 3.5.

Symmetrical distributions:

  1. When a distribution is symmetrical, the mode, median and mean are all in the middle of the distribution.
  2. There are three main measures of central tendency: the mode, the median and the mean.
    1. Each of these measures describes a different indication of the typical or central value in the distribution.
  3. Every measure of skewness equals zero for a symmetric distribution.

Skewed Distributions:

  1. When a distribution is skewed the mode remains the most commonly occurring value, the median remains the middle value in the distribution, but the mean is generally ‘pulled’ in the direction of the tails. In a skewed distribution, the median is often a preferred measure of central tendency, as the mean is not usually in the middle of the distribution.

Positive Skew:

  1. A distribution is said to be positively or right skewed when the tail on the right side of the distribution is longer than the left side. In a positively skewed distribution it is common for the mean to be ‘pulled’ toward the right tail of the distribution. Although there are exceptions to this rule, generally, most of the values, including the median value, tend to be less than the mean value
    1. Example:
      1. Retirement Age Frequency Distribution
        1. 51-53: 4
        2. 54-56: 19
        3. 57-59: 11
        4. 60-62: 7
        5. 63-65: 3
        6. 66-68: 2
      2. Mode = 54
      3. Median = 56
      4. Mean = 57.2
      5. NOTE – Highest point is on left middle of distribution but more data sets are on the right side making it longer and shorter

Negative Skew

  1. A distribution is said to be negatively or left skewed when the tail on the left side of the distribution is longer than the right side. In a negatively skewed distribution, it is common for the mean to be ‘pulled’ toward the left tail of the distribution. Although there are exceptions to this rule, generally, most of the values, including the median value, tend to be greater than the mean value.
  2. Example:
    1. Retirement Age Frequency Distribution
      1. 51-53: 1
      2. 54-56: 3
      3. 57-59: 6
      4. 60-62: 10
      5. 63-65: 18
      6. 66-68: 4
    2. Mode = 65
    3. Median = 63
    4. Mean = 61.8
    5. NOTE – Highest point is on right middle of distribution but more data sets are on the left side making it longer and shorter

Outliers:

  • are extreme, or atypical data values that are notable different from the rest of the data
  • It is important to detect outliers within a distribution, because they can alter the results of the data analysis. The mean is more sensitive to the existence of outliers than the median or mode.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. Population Mean?
  2. Sample Mean?
  3. Arithmetic Mean?
  4. What is the problem with arithemetic mean

Example 1

  1. The following are the annual returns on a given asset realized between 2005 and 2015.
    1. 12%
    2. 13%
    3. 11.5%
    4. 14%
    5. 9.5%
    6. 17%
    7. 16.1%
    8. 13%
    9. 11%
    10. 14%
A
  1. The population mean is the summation of all the observed values in the population divided by the total number of observations, N.
  2. The population mean defers from the sample mean, which is based on a few observed values ‘n’ that are chosen from the population
  3. The population mean and the sample mean are both arithmetic means. The arithmetic mean for any data set is unique and is computed using all the data values. Among all the measures of central tendency, it is the only measure for which the sum of the deviations from the mean is zero
  4. A commonly-sighted demerit of the arithmetic mean is that it’s not resistant to the effects of extreme observations, or what we call ‘outsider values.’ For instance, consider the following data set: {1 3 4 5 34}
    1. The arithmetic mean is 9.4, which is greater than most of the values. This is due to the last extreme observation i.e. 34.

Example 1

  1. Population Mean
    1. (0.12 + 0.13 + 0.115 + 0.14 + 0.098 + 0.17 + 0.161 + 0.13 + 0.11 + 0.14)/10
    2. = 0.1314 or 13.14%
  2. Sample Mean
    1. (0.13 + 0.11 + 0.14)/3
    2. = 0.1267 or 12.67%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Weighted Mean = ΣXiWi

Example 1

A portfolio consists of 30% ordinary shares, 25% T-bills and 45% preference shares with returns of 7%, 4%, and 6% respectively. Compute the portfolio return

A

The weighted mean takes into account the weight of every observation. It recognizes that different observations may have disproportionate effects on the arithmetic mean.

Example 1

The return of any portfolio is always the weighted average of the returns of individual assets. Thus:

  1. Portfolio return = (0.07 * 0.3) + (0.04 * 0.25) + (0.06 * 0.45) = 5.8%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Geometric Mean

How do you handle non-negative values?

Example

An ordinary share from a certain company registered the following rates of return over a 6-year period:

  • -4% 2% 8% 12% 14% 15%

Compute the compound annual rate of return for the period

A

It’s a measure of central tendency, mainly used to measure growth rates. We define it as the nth root of the product of n observations i.e.

GM = (((1+RerturnX1) * (1+RerturnX2) * (1+RerturnX3) * (1+RerturnX4) 1/4 -1) x 100

The formula above only works when we have non-negative values. To solve this problem especially when dealing with percentage returns, we add 1 to every value and then subtract 1 from the final result.

Example - Geometric Mean

  • GM = (1 + .04 * 1 + .02 * 1 + .12 * 1 + 0.14 * 1 + .15)<span>1/6</span> - 1
  • GM = ((0.96 * 1.02* 1.08 * 1.12 * 1.14 * 1.15)1/6 - 1) * 100=
  • (1.0761 – 1) * 100 =
  • 7.61%

Example Arithmetic Mean

  • (-4 + 2 + 8 + 12 + 14 + 15) / 6 =
  • 7.833%

TAKE AWAYS

  1. The geometric mean is most appropriate for series that exhibit serial correlation. This is especially true for investment portfolios.
  2. Most returns in finance are correlated, including yields on bonds, stock returns, and market risk premiums. The longer the time horizon, the more critical compounding becomes, and the more appropriate the use of geometric mean.
  3. For volatile numbers, the geometric average provides a far more accurate measurement of the true return by taking into account year-over-year compounding.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Geometric Mean is always ______ than the Arithmetic Mean

A

the geometric mean is always less than the arithmetic mean and the gap between the two widens as the variability of values increases

Arithmetic Mean

  • In the world of finance, the arithmetic mean is not usually an appropriate method for calculating an average. Consider investment returns, for example. Suppose you’ve invested your savings in the financial markets for five years. If your portfolio returns each year were 90%, 10%, 20%, 30% and -90%, what would your average return be during this period?
  • With the arithmetic average, the average return would be 12%, which appears at first glance to be impressive—but it’s not entirely accurate.

Geometric Mean

  • The formula appears to be quite intense, but on paper, it’s not that complex. Returning to our example, let’s calculate the geometric average: Our returns were 90%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and -90%, so we plug them into the formula as:
    • (1.9 * 1.1 * 1.2 * 1.3 * 0.1)^1/5 - 1
    • =.7992 - 1
    • =-0.2008
    • =20.08%
  • The result gives a geometric average annual return of -20.08%. The result using the geometric average is a lot worse than the 12% arithmetic average we calculated earlier, and unfortunately, it’s also the number that represents reality in this case.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Expected Value - Probability Weighted Value

A

In a probability distribution, the weighted average of possible values of a random variable, with weights given by their respective theoretical probabilities, is known as the expected value

MPT = Uses Probability Weighted Average for Expected Value

= R1P1 + R2P2 + … + RnPn

NOTE - No dividing by the total numbers; summation only; the “N” is taken care of in each probability applied to each return!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Variance - With Same Probabilities

Variance - With Unequal Probabilities

A

The arithmetic average of the squared deviations away from the mean.

For well-diversified equity portfolios, symmetrical distribution is a reasonable assumption, so the variance is an appropriate measure of downside risk.

  1. Variance = [(Each Annual Return - Average Return)2] / Total Number of Returns

Variance with Unequal Probabilities: The summation of:

  1. Variance = [Probability of Annual Return (Each Annual Return - Average Return

Steps:

  1. Work out the mean of the set
  2. For each number, subtract the Mean and Square the Result
  3. Then work out the mean of those squared differences
  4. For Standard Dev, take the square root of that and we are done!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Semi-Variance

A

Measures downside risk relative to a benchmark given by expected return. It is equal to the average of the squared deviations below the mean.

Semivariance =

(1/n) x Summation of (Average - rt)2

Where:

  • n = total number of observations below the mean
  • rt = the observed value
  • Average = mean or target value of the dataset

Semivariance is a useful tool in portfolio or asset analysis because it provides a measure for downside risk.

While standard deviation and variance provide measures of volatility, semivariance only looks at the negative fluctuations of an asset. Semivariance can be used to calculate the average loss that a portfolio could incur because it neutralizes all values above the mean, or above an investor’s target return.

For risk-averse investors, determining optimal portfolio allocations by minimizing semivariance could reduce the likelihood of a large decline in the portfolio’s value

If returns on an asset are symmetrical, semivariance is proportional to the variance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Value at Risk Measure

A

Value at Risk Measure:

  • widely used by banks to measure their exposure to adverse events and to measure the least expected loss that will be expected with a certain probability.

Three Components:

  1. Time Period = a day, month, or year
  2. Confidence Level = typically either 95% or 99%
  3. Loss Amount = typically expressed in dollar or percentage terms

Example

  • If 5% of the outcomes are below -30%, and if the decision maker is concerned about how poor the outcomes are 5% of the time, then -30%

This metric is most commonly used by investment and commercial banks to determine the extent and occurrence ratio of potential losses in their institutional portfolios.

Using a firm-wide VaR assessment allows for the determination of the cumulative risks from aggregated positions held by different trading desks and departments within the institution. Using the data provided by VaR modeling, financial institutions can determine whether they have sufficient capital reserves in place to cover losses or whether higher-than-acceptable risks require them to reduce concentrated holdings.

PROBLEMS:

  1. There is no standard protocol for the statistics used to determine asset, portfolio or firm-wide risk
    1. For example, statistics pulled arbitrarily from a period of low volatility may understate the potential for risk events to occur and the magnitude of those events
    2. Risk may be further understated using normal distribution probabilities, which rarely account for extreme or black-swan events
      2.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the three methods of measuring VaR?

A
  1. Historical Method
    1. If we calculate each daily return, we produce a rich data set of more than 1,400 points
    2. Let’s put them in a histogram that compares the frequency of return “buckets.”
    3. For example, at the highest point of the histogram (the highest bar), there were more than 250 days when the daily return was between 0% and 1%. At the far right, you can barely see a tiny bar at 13%; it represents the one single day (in Jan 2000) within a period of five-plus years when the daily return for the QQQ was a stunning 12.4%
    4. Notice the red bars that compose the “left tail” of the histogram. These are the lowest 5% of daily returns (since the returns are ordered from left to right, the worst are always the “left tail”). The red bars run from daily losses of 4% to 8%. Because these are the worst 5% of all daily returns, we can say with 95% confidence that the worst daily loss will not exceed 4%.
    5. That is VAR in a nutshell. Let’s re-phrase the statistic into both percentage and dollar terms:
      1. With 95% confidence, we expect that our worst daily loss will not exceed 4%.
      2. If we invest $100, we are 95% confident that our worst daily loss will not exceed $4 ($100 x -4%).
    6. You can see that VAR indeed allows for an outcome that is worse than a return of -4%. It does not express absolute certainty but instead makes a probabilistic estimate. If we want to increase our confidence, we need only to “move to the left” on the same histogram, to where the first two red bars, at -8% and -7% represent the worst 1% of daily returns:
      1. With 99% confidence, we expect that the worst daily loss will not exceed 7%.
      2. Or, if we invest $100, we are 99% confident that our worst daily loss will not exceed $7.
  2. The Variance-Covariance Method
    1. This method assumes that stock returns are normally distributed. In other words, it requires that we estimate only two factors - an expected (or average) return and a standard deviation - which allow us to plot a normal distribution curve.
    2. The idea behind the variance-covariance is similar to the ideas behind the historical method - except that we use the familiar curve instead of actual data. The advantage of the normal curve is that we automatically know where the worst 5% and 1% lie on the curve.
    3. They are a function of our desired confidence and the standard deviation
    4. The blue curve above is based on the actual daily standard deviation of the QQQ, which is 2.64%. The average daily return happened to be fairly close to zero, so we will assume an average return of zero for illustrative purposes.
  3. Monte Carlo Simulation
    1. The third method involves developing a model for future stock price returns and running multiple hypothetical trials through the model. A Monte Carlo simulationrefers to any method that randomly generates trials, but by itself does not tell us anything about the underlying methodology.
    2. For most users, a Monte Carlo simulation amounts to a “black box” generator of random, probablistic outcomes. Without going into further details, we ran a Monte Carlo simulation on the QQQ based on its historical trading pattern. In our simulation, 100 trials were conducted. If we ran it again, we would get a different result–although it is highly likely that the differences would be narrow. Here is the result arranged into a histogram (please note that while the previous graphs have shown daily returns, this graph displays monthly returns):
    3. To summarize, we ran 100 hypothetical trials of monthly returns for the QQQ. Among them, two outcomes were between -15% and -20%; and three were between -20% and 25%. That means the worst five outcomes (that is, the worst 5%) were less than -15%. The Monte Carlo simulation therefore leads to the following VAR-type conclusion: with 95% confidence, we do not expect to lose more than 15% during any given month.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

If returns are symmetrical, what metrics can be used?

A
  1. In cases where distribution of returns is symmetrical, the ordering of portfolios in mean-variance space will be the same as the ordering of porfolios in mean semivariance space or mean and any of the other measures of downside risk discussed earlier.
  2. If returns on an asset are symmetrical, the semivariance is proportional to the variance. Thus, in most of the portfolio literature, the variance, or equivalently the standard deviation, is used as a measure of dispersion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The very essence of Modern Portfolio Theory:

How does variance change for a combination of assets vs. single asset?

A

The risk of a combination of assets is very different from a simple average of the risk of the individual assets. Most dramatically, the variance of a combination of two assets may be less than the variance of either of the assets themselves.

Remember, the risk of a combination of assets is very different from a simple average of the risk of individual assets. Most dramatically, the variance of a combination of two assets may be less than the variance of either asset by itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Condition of Market / Return of A2 / Return of A3 / Combination of A2 and A3

Good / $1.16 / $1.01 / $1.10

Average / $1.10 / $1.10 / $1.10

Poor / $1.04 / $1.19 / $1.10

Suppose the investor invests $0.60 in A2 and $0.40 in A3, what is the return in each condition of the market?

A

Good=

  1. $0.696 + $0.404 = $1.10

Average

  1. $0.66 + $0.44 = $1.10

Poor =

  1. $0.624 + $0.476 = $1.10

When assets have their good and bad outcomes at different times (assets 2 and 3), investment in these assets can radically reduce the dispersion obtained by investing in one of the assets by itself. In our example, the good and bad outcomes are always negatively correlated at -1, then the dispersion is reduced to 0.

NOTE - If the good outcomes of an asset are not always associated with the bad outcomes of a second asset, but the general tendency is in this direction, then the reduction in dispersion still occurs, but the dispersion will not drop all the way to zero, as it did in our example.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Asset 4 has three Possible Returns which depends on rainfall. Therefore, if the rainfall is plentiful, we can have good-, average-, or poor-security markets. Plentiful rainfall does not change the likelihood of any particular market condition occurring.

Asset 4 returns (rainful):

  1. Plentiful = 16%
  2. Average = 10%
  3. Poor = 4%

Asset 2 returns (market conditions):

  1. Good = 16%
  2. Average = 10%
  3. Poor = 4%

Consider an investor with $1,00 who invests $0.50 in each asset. Because we have assumed that each possible level of rainfall is equally likely as each possible condition of the market, there are nine equally likely outcomes.

A

Ordering them from highest to lowest, we have:

  1. $1.16
  2. $1.13
  3. $1.13
  4. $1.10
  5. $1.10
  6. $1.10
  7. $1.07
  8. $1.07
  9. $1.04

NOTE = The mean is the same as an investment in Asset 2 by itself, however, the dispersion around the mean is less! Now, instead of a 1/3 chance of $1.16 and $1.04, there is a 1/9 probability of $1.16 and $1.04. Less dispersion.

NOTE = With independent returns, extreme observations can still occur, they just occur less frequently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Condition of Market / Return of A2 / Return of A5 / Combination of A2 and A5

Good / $1.16 / $1.16 / $1.16

Average / $1.10 / $1.10 / $1.10

Poor / $1.04 / $1.04 / $1.04

A

The result is the same and holding a portfolio.

17
Q

Three Securities - Monthly Returns in percent (2011). What are the returns of 1/2 in MSFT and 1/2 in Dell; 1/2 MSFT and 1/2 in GE; 1/2 in Dell and 1/2 in GE?

  1. MSFT / DE / GE
    1. -0.66% / -2.88% / 10.11%
    2. -3.55% / 20.29% / 4.57%
    3. -4.48% / -8.34% / -4.16%
    4. 2.09% / 6.62% / 2.00%
    5. -2.89% / 3.94% / -3.96%
    6. 3.96% / 3.67% / -3.21%
    7. 5.38% / -2.58% / -5.04%
    8. -2.34% / -8.47% / -8.93%
    9. -6.43% / -4.88% / -5.76%
    10. 6.99% / 11.81% / 9.79%
    11. -3.19% / -0.32% / -4.79%
    12. 1.49% / -7.17% / 13.64%
  2. Averages
    1. MSFT = -0.30%
    2. DE = 0.98%
    3. GE = 0.35%
  3. Standard Dev
    1. MSFT = 4.24%
    2. DE = 8.76%
    3. GE = 7.46%
  4. Correlation Coefficient = Covariance of (rxry) / (Standard Dev rx)(Standard Dev ry)
    1. Microsoft and Dell = ?
    2. Microsoft and GE = ?
    3. Dell and GE = ?
A

1/2 MSFT + 1/2 DE

  1. -1.77%
  2. 8.37%
  3. -6.41%
  4. 4.35%
  5. 0.52%
  6. 3.81%
  7. 1.40%
  8. -5.40%
  9. -5.65%
  10. 9.40%
  11. -1.75%
  12. -2.84%
  • Average = 0.34%
  • Standard Dev = 5.30%
  • Correlation Coefficient = 0.24

1/2 MSFT + 1/2 GE

  1. 4.73%
  2. 0.51%
  3. -4.32%
  4. 2.04%
  5. -3.43%
  6. 0.38%
  7. 0.17%
  8. -5.63%
  9. -6.10%
  10. 8.39%
  11. -3.99%
  12. 7.56%
  • Average = 0.03%
  • Standard Dev = 4.95%
  • Correlation Coefficient = 0.39

1/2 DE + 1/2 GE

  1. 3.62%
  2. 12.43%
  3. -6.25%
  4. 4.31%
  5. -0.01%
  6. 0.23%
  7. -3.81%
  8. -8.70%
  9. -5.32%
  10. 10.80%
  11. -2.55%
  12. 3.23%
  • Average = 0.66%
  • Standard Dev = 6.55%
  • Correlation Coefficient = 0.30
18
Q

Expected Return on Portfolio = Weighted average of the expected returns on the individual asset

Expected Value of the Sum of Various Returns = the sum expected value

Expected value of a constant times a return = a constant time the expected return

Illustration of the Example

  • Consider the investment in assets 2 and assets 3 discussed earlier.
  • No matter what occurs, we have a return of 10%
  • $.6 was invested in Asset 2 and $.4 in Asset 4
  • Find the Expected Return on the Portfolio
A
  1. Expected Return on the Portfolio
    1. Rp = (0.60 / 1.00)(0.10) + (0.40/1.00)(0.10) = 0.10

Note - The expected return is the summation of the weighted returns on each individual asset

19
Q

The Variance of the Portfolio is simply the expected value of the squared deviation of the return on the portfolio from the mean return on the portfolio.

A

Variance - Variance is much more difficult than the summation of weighted expected returns because Squared Deviations are part of it…Thus, you have to deal with “Foil”

  • The summation of the squared weighted variance of each asset and 2 multiplied by the weights of each par of assets and the covariance of each pair of assets. Two Security Portfolio:
  • σ<span>2</span>P = X12 * σ12 + X22 * σ22 +2X1X<span>2</span> _(_R1j - Average of R1)(R2j - Average of R2)
  • VARIANCE OF A TWO SECURITY PORTFOLIO:
    • (Weight of AssetA2 x Standard DevA2 + Weight of AssetB2 x Standard DevB2 + (2 x Weight of AssetA x Weight of AssetB x Standard DevA x Standard DevB x Correlation Coefficient of AB)
  • VARIANCE OF A THREE SECURITY PORTFOLIO:
    • Need to add bolded terms:
    • σ2 = (Weight of AssetA2 x Standard DevA2 + Weight of AssetB2 x Standard DevB2 + Weight of AssetC2 x Standard Devc<strong>2</strong> + (2 x Weight of AssetA x Weight of AssetB x Standard DevA x Standard DevB x Correlation Coefficient of AB) + (2 x Weight of AssetA x Weight of AssetC x Standard DevA x Standard DevC x Correlation Coefficient of AC)+(2 x Weight of AssetB x Weight of AssetC x Standard DevB x Standard DevC x Correlation Coefficient of BC)
20
Q

Calculating Covariance between Securities 1 & 2 and between Securities 1 and 3

Table of Returns:

Condition of Market / Return of A1 / Return of A2 / Return of A3

Good = 15 / 16 / 1

Average = 9 / 10 / 10

Poor = 3 / 4 / 19

  1. Example 1
    1. Find the Variance, Covariance, and Correlation Coefficient of A1 and A2
  2. Example 2
    1. Find the Variance, Covariance, and Correlation Coefficient of A1 and A3
A

AS THE NUMBER OF SECURITIES REACHES INFINITY, THE VARIANCE OF THE PORTFOLIO WILL CONVERGE TO THE COVARAINCE

  • For example, in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which is used to calculate the expected return of an asset, the covariance between a security and the market is used in the formula for one of the model’s key variables, beta.

Covariance =

  1. To determine the variance of a portfolio, part of the equation will include the covariance, i.e.:
    1. 2X1X2(R1j - Average of R1)(R2j - Average of R2​)

Example 1 = Covariance Between A1 and A2

Cov(X,Y) = ΣE((X-μ)(Y-ν)) / n

  1. (15 - 9)(16-10) + (9-9)(10-10) + (3-9)(4-10) =
  2. 36 + 0 + 36 = 72
  3. 72 / 3 = 24

Variance =

  1. [(15-9)2 + (9-9)2 + (3-9)2 ] / 3
  2. Variance = 24

Correlation Coefficient

  1. Covariance (A1,A2) / (Standard Dev of A1)(Standard Dev of A2)
  2. = 24 / (24)1/2(24)1/2
  3. = 24/ (4.899)(4.899)
  4. = 1

Example 2

Covariance

  1. (15 - 9)(1 - 10) + (9-9)(10-10) + (3-9)(19-10) = -108
  2. -108/3= 72
  3. Covariance = -36

Correlation Coefficient

  1. =-36 / (24)1/2(54)1/2
  2. =-36/-36
  3. Correlation Coefficient = -1

Notice what the Covariance Does: a measure of the returns on assets moving in relation to one another.

  1. It is the product of TWO deviations:
    1. It will be positive when the good outcomes for each stock occur together (i.e. two positive numbers multiplied together)
    2. It will be positive when the bad outcomes for each stock occur together (i.e. two negative numbers multiplied together)
    3. When one number is positive and one number is negative, the outcomes don’t move together and are negative
21
Q

Variance of Portfolio where 0.60 is put in Asset 2 with a Variance of 24 and 0.40 is put in Asset 3 with a Variance of 54. The covariance between these two is -36.

A

Variance of Portfolio = [(PortionA2 x σA2) + [(PortionB2 x σB2) + 2(PortionA x Portion B x σAB)

(0.60/1.00)2(24) + (0.40/1.00)2(54) + 2(0.60/1.00)(0.40/1.00)(-36) = 0

The Variance = 0

Makes sense, the Correlation Coefficient is -1; when this situation occurs, a portfolio can always be constructed with zero risk.

22
Q

Does a Covariance of 0 indicate that there will be more risk or less risk as compared to holding either asset individually

EXAMPLE - Covariance and Coefficient

Obtain the prices for two different figures:

  • ABC Corp + S&P 500

ABC Corp

  1. 2013 = 68
  2. 2014 = 102
  3. 2015 = 110
  4. 2016 = 112
  5. 2017 = 154

S&P 500

  1. 2013 = 1692
  2. 2014 = 1978
  3. 2015 = 1884
  4. 2016 = 2151
  5. 2017 = 2519
A

When the Covariance and Correlation Coefficient is zero, a portfolio can be found that has a lower variance than either of the assets by themselves

It is useful to standardize the Covariance, by turning it into the Correlation Coefficient. Divide the covariance between two assets by the product of the standard deviation of each asset produces a variable with the same properties as the covariance, but with a range of -1 + 1

Correlation Coefficient =

  1. Covariance of AB / (Stand Dev of A)(Stand Dev of B)
  2. Þ<span>AB</span> = σAB / (σA)(σA)

Covariance

  1. First Step = Obtain the Average of Each Asset:
    1. ABC Corp. = 109.20
    2. S&P 500 = 2,044.80
  2. Second Step = Find the difference between each value and mean price:
    1. Subtract each data point (year) from the average for each security
    2. Multiply the difference between ABC and S&P 500 for the year 2013, and then do the same for 2014 - 2017.
    3. Add up the product for each year and divide it by the total number of years OR the total number of years subtracted by 1.
    4. =(-352.80)(-41.20) + (-66.80)(-7.20)+(-160.80)(0.80)+(106.20)(2.80)+(474.20)(44.80)
    5. =36,429.20 / 5
    6. = 7,285.84
  3. Third Step = Find the Standard Deviation of ABC and S&P 500
    1. Work out the mean of the numbers
      1. ABC = 109.20
      2. S&P 500 = 2,044.80
    2. For each number, subtract the mean and square the result and add them together
      1. We did this already above
      2. ABC Corp
        1. = (-41.20)2 + (-7.20)2 + (.80)2 + (2.80)2 + (44.80)2
        2. = 3,764.80 / 5
        3. Variance = 752.96
        4. = (752.96)^1/2
        5. Standard Dev =27.44
      3. S&P
        1. = (-352.80)2 + (-66.80)2 +(-160.80)2 +(106.20)2 +(474.20)2
        2. =390,930.80 / 5
        3. Variance = 78,186.16
        4. Standard Dev = 279.62
  4. Fourth Step - Divide the Correlation by the Product of the Standard Devs
    1. 7,285.84 / (27.44)(279.62)
  5. Correlation Coefficient
    1. = 0.9496

The coefficient indicates that the prices of the S&P 500 and ABC have a high positive correlated. This means that their respective prices tend to move in the same direction. Therefore, adding ABC to his portfolio would, in fact, increase the level of systematic risk.

23
Q

Variance for Multi-Asset Portfolio

A

First Part = The sum of:

  • the weight squared multiplied by the variance (which is a square) of each asset

Second Part = Covariance Terms:

  • With three assets, 2 multiplied by the weights of each pair of asset multiplied by the covariance between each pair of assets (pairs of assets = (1 and 2), (1 and 3), and (2 and 3)
  • With four assets, 2 multiplied by the weights of each pair of asset multiplied by the covariance between each pair of assets (1 and 2), (1 and 3), (1 and 4), (2 and 3), (2 and 4), (3 and 4)
  • Each covariance term is multiplied by 2 times the product of the proportions invested in each asset

Third Part = Add together the

24
Q

What is the lesson to be learned about the size of the portfolio?

What is the limitation?

A

As number of holdings becomes extremely large, the variance of the portfolio approaches zero.

GENERAL RESULT

  • If we have enough independent assets, the variance of a portfolio of these assets approaches zero.
  • While this is the general rule, most markets have a correlation coefficient and covariance between assets that are positive…THUS THE PORTFOLIO CANNOT BE MADE TO GO TO ZERO
25
Q

When we have a portfolio of assets and add individual securities, what happens to:

  1. The Variance of the Portfolio
  2. The Covariance of the Portfolio

What is the conclusion:

A

(1) The contribution to the portfolio variance of the variance of individual securities goes to zero as the total number of securities gets very large
(2) The contribution of the covariance terms approaches the average covariance as N gets very large.

Conclusion - The individual risk of securities can be diversified away, but the contribution to the total risk caused by the covariance terms cannot be diversified away.

26
Q

The Average Variance of the NYSE was 46.619

The Average Covariance of the NYSE was 7.058

What happens to the Expected Portfolio Variance when securities are added

A

The Expected Portfolio Variance will reduce until the average covariance is hit:

Effect of Diversification

  1. Number of Securities / Expected Portfolio Variance
    1. 1 Security / 46.619 Expected Portfolio Variance
    2. 2 Securities / 26.839 Expected Portfolio Variance
    3. 4 Securities / 16.948 Expected Portfolio Variance
    4. 6 Securities / 13.651 Expected Portfolio Variance
    5. 12 Securities / 10.354 Expected Portfolio Variance
    6. 20 Securities / 9.036 Expected Portfolio Variance
    7. 40 Securities / 8.047 Expected Portfolio Variance
    8. 100 Securities / 7.453 Expected Portfolio Variance
    9. 1000 Securities / 7.097 Expected Portfolio Variance
    10. Infinity / 7.058 Expected Portfolio Variance
27
Q

Percentage of Risk on an Individual Security that can be eliminated by holding a random portfolio of stocks within Selected National Markets and among National Markets (1975)

Why are some countries able to reduce more risk than others?

A

U.S. = 73%

United Kingdom = 65.5%

France = 67.3%

Germany = 56.2%

Italy = 60.0%

  1. Because securities have a high covariance, the stocks move together and its harder to reduce away risk.

Belgium = 80.0%

  1. Because securities have relatively low covariances, diversification is more effective at removing risk.

Switzerland = 56.0%

Netherlands = 76.1%

International Stocks = 89.3%

28
Q

Example

Two Indexes:

  1. Stock Index = Value-Weighted Index of the 20% of stocks on NYSE with largest market value
    1. Value weighting means that the weight of the portfolio each stock represents is the market value of that stock (price times number of shares) divided by the aggregate market value of all shares in the index.
    2. Largest market values are weighted more heavily
  2. Bond Index = Index of Corporate Bond Returns

Historica Data - (Let their correlation coefficient be Þ

  1. Average Return of Stocks = 11.8%
  2. Average Return of Bonds = 6.4%
  3. Standard Deviation of Stocks = 20.3%
  4. Standard Deviation of Bonds = 8.4%
  5. þSB = 0.01
A

Proportion of Stocks / Proportion of Bonds / Mean Return / Standard Dev

  1. 1.0 / 0.0 / 11.8 / 20.3
  2. 0.9 / 0.1 / 11.26 / 18.29
  3. 0.8 / 0.2 / 10.72 / 16.33
  4. 0.7 / 0.3 / 10.18 / 14.43
  5. 0.6 / 0.4 / 9.64 / 12.63
  6. 0.5 / 0.5 / 9.1 / 10.98
  7. 0.4 / 0.6 / 8.56 / 9.56
  8. 0.3 / 0.7 / 8.02 / 8.47
  9. 0.2 / 0.8 / 7.48 / 7.85
  10. 0.1 / 0.9 / 6.94 / 7.83
  11. 0.0 / 1.0 / 6.40 / 8.40

CONCLUSIONS =

  1. Expected Return varies linearly from 11.8 to 6.4
  2. Risk does not decrease linearly!
29
Q

Example

Two Indexes:

  1. Domestic Index
  2. International Index

Historical Data

  1. Average Return of Stocks in US = 11.8%
  2. Average Return of Int’l Stocks = 9.2%
  3. Standard Deviation of Stocks in US = 20.3%
  4. Standard Deviation of Int’l Stocks = 18.4%
  5. ÞUS, INT = .66
A

Proportion of Stocks / Proportion of Bonds / Mean Return / Standard Dev

  1. 0 / 0.0 / 11.8 / 20.3
  2. 9 / 0.1 / 11.54 / 18.36
  3. 8 / 0.2 / 11.28 / 16.65
  4. 7 / 0.3 / 11.02 / 15.24
  5. 6 / 0.4 / 10.76 / 14.23
  6. 5 / 0.5 / 10.50 / 13.70
  7. 4 / 0.6 / 10.24 / 13.70
  8. 3 / 0.7 / 9.98 / 14.25
  9. 2 / 0.8 / 9.72 / 15.27
  10. 1 / 0.9 / 9.46 / 16.68
  11. 0 / 1.0 / 9.20 / 18.40

Powerful demonstration of the effect of diversification.

30
Q

Assume that you are considering selecting assets from among the following four candidates:

  1. 1st Asset: Condition / Return / Probability
    1. Good Condition / 16 / 1/4
    2. Average / 12 / 1/2
    3. Poor / 8 / 1/4
  2. 2nd Asset: Condition / Return / Probability
    1. Good Condition / 4 / 1/4
    2. Average / 6 / 1/2
    3. Poor / 8 / 1/4
  3. 3rd Asset: Condition / Return / Probability
    1. Good Condition / 20 / 1/4
    2. Average / 14 / 1/2
    3. Poor / 8 / 1/4
  4. 4th Asset: Condition / Return / Probability
    1. Plentiful / 16 / 1/3
    2. Average / 12 / 1/3
    3. Light / 8 / 1/3

Assume that there is no relationship between the amount of rainfall and the condition of the stock market

Solve for the expected return and the standard deviation of return for Asset 1 and Asset 4, separately.

A

(1) Expected Return of Asset 1

  • (1/4)(16) + (1/2)(12) + (1/4)(8) =
  • 4 + 6 + 2 = 12
  • 12%

(1) Expected Return of Asset 4

  • (1/3)(16) + (1/3)(12) + (1/3)(8) =
  • (0.533) + (0.04) + (0.0266) =
  • 12%

(1) Standard deviation of return for each separate investment

  • ((16% - 12%)2 x 0.25) + ((12% - 12%)2 x 0.5) + ((8% - 12%)2 x 0.25)1/2
  • (4 + 0 + 4)1/2
  • 2.83%

(1) Standard deviation of return for each separate investment

  • ((16% - 12%)2 x 1/3) + ((12% - 12%)2 x 1/3) + ((8% - 12%)2 x 1/3)1/2
  • (5.3333 + 0 + 5.3333)1/2
  • 3.27%
31
Q

Assume that you are considering selecting assets from among the following four candidates:

  1. 1st Asset: Condition / Return / Probability
    1. Good Condition / 16 / 1/4
    2. Average / 12 / 1/2
    3. Poor / 8 / 1/4
    4. Expected Return = 12%
    5. Standard Deviation = 2.83%
  2. 2nd Asset: Condition / Return / Probability
    1. Good Condition / 4 / 1/4
    2. Average / 6 / 1/2
    3. Poor / 8 / 1/4
    4. Expected Return = 6%
    5. Standard Deviation = 1.41%
  3. 3rd Asset: Condition / Return / Probability
    1. Good Condition / 20 / 1/4
    2. Average / 14 / 1/2
    3. Poor / 8 / 1/4
    4. Expected Return = 14%
    5. Standard Deviation = 4.24%
  4. 4th Asset: Condition / Return / Probability
    1. Plentiful / 16 / 1/3
    2. Average / 12 / 1/3
    3. Light / 8 / 1/3
    4. Expected Return = 12%
    5. Standard Deviation = 3.27%

Assume that there is no relationship between the amount of rainfall and the condition of the stock market

Solve for the correlation coefficient and the covariance between each pair of investments

A

Solve for Covariance:

Recall - that covariance is the sum of the deviations (from the mean) of the two assets multiplied together. Additionally, we multiply each deviation component with the associated probability

  1. Covariance of return between asset 1 and asset 2
    1. = [(16% - 12%) x (4% - 6%) x 0.25] + [(12% - 12%) x ((6% - 6%) x 0.5) + ((8% - 12%) x (8% - 8%) x 0.25)
    2. = (4% x (-2%) x 0.25) + (0% x 0% x 0.5) + (-4% x 2% x 0.25)
    3. = -4%
    4. Covariance = -4%
  2. Covariance between Asset __ and Asset 4
    1. Covariance = 0
    2. Assumption which states that there is no relationship between rainfall and market conditions result in the covariance between each asset with asset 4 to be zero!
  3. The Covariance of an Asset with itself is the variance of the asset
    1. Asset 1 = (2.83%)2
      1. 8
    2. Asset 2 = (1.41%)2
      1. = 2
    3. Asset 3 = (4.24%)2
      1. = 18
    4. Asset 4 = (3.27%)2
      1. = 10.7

The covariance of all possible pairs:

  1. Asset 1 and Asset 2
    1. Covariance = - 4
  2. Asset 1 and Asset 3
    1. Covariance = 12
  3. Asset 1 and Asset 4
    1. Covariance = 0
  4. Asset 2 and Asset 3
    1. Covariance = - 6
  5. Asset 2 and Asset 4
    1. Covariance = 0
  6. Asset 3 and Asset 4
    1. Covariance = 0

Correlation Coefficient

  1. Asset 1 and Asset 2
      • 4 / 2.83 x 1.41
    1. = -1.0024
    2. The perfectly negative correlation between asset 1 and asset 2
  2. Correlation with itself = 1 (obviously)
  3. Correlation of the following
  4. Asset 1 and Asset 3
    1. 1
  5. Asset 1 and Asset 4
    1. 0
  6. Asset 2 and Asset 3
    1. -1
  7. Asset 2 and Asset 4
    1. 0
  8. Asset 3 and Asset 4
    1. 0
32
Q

50% and 50% of Asset 1 and Asset - Solve for Expected Return and Variance

Assume that you are considering selecting assets from among the following four candidates:

1st Asset: Condition / Return / Probability

  • Good Condition / 16 / 1/4
  • Average / 12 / 1/2
  • Poor / 8 / 1/4
  • Standard Dev = 2.83%

2nd Asset: Condition / Return / Probability

  • Good Condition / 4 / 1/4
  • Average / 6 / 1/2
  • Poor / 8 / 1/4
  • Standard Dev = 1.41%

3rd Asset: Condition / Return / Probability

  • Good Condition / 20 / 1/4
  • Average / 14 / 1/2
  • Poor / 8 / 1/4
  • Standard Dev = 4.24%

4th Asset: Condition / Return / Probability

  • Plentiful / 16 / 1/3
  • Average / 12 / 1/3
  • Light / 8 / 1/3
  • Standard Dev = 3.27%

Portfolio A = 50% Asset 1 and 50% Asset 2

Portfolio B = 50% Asset 1 and 50% Asset 3

Portfolio C = 50% Asset 1 and 50% Asset 4

Portfolio D = 50% Asset 2 and 50% Asset 3

Portfolio E = 50% Asset 3 and 50% Asset 4

Portfolio F = 1/3 Asset 1 and 1/3 Asset 2 and 1/3 Asset 3

Portfolio G = 1/3 Asset 2 and 1/3 Asset 3 and 1/3 Asset 4

Portfolio H = 1/3 Asset 1 and 1/3 Asset 3 and 1/3 Asset 4

Portfolio I = 1/4 Asset 1 and 1/4 Asset 2 and 1/4 Asset 3 and 1/4 Asset 4

A

Expected Returns and variance of each portfolio:

  • In this objective, we are given nine portfolios and asked to calculate the expected return and variance of each portfolio
  • The expected return of a portfolio is equal to the sum of the mean return of each individual asset multiplied by the proportion of the asset in the portfolio.
  • Expected return for portfolio A is calculated below:
    • Return of A = (1/2 x 12%) + (1/2 x 6%)
    • =(6%) + (3%)
    • = 9%
  • Expected Return on Nine Portfolios
    • A = 9%
    • B = 13%
    • C = 12%
    • D = 10%
    • E = 13%
    • F = 10.67%
    • G = 10.67%
    • H = 12.67%
    • I = 11%

Calculate the Variance of Each Portfolio

  1. [(1/2)2 x 8 + (1/2)2 x 2] + 2[(1/2)(1/2) x (-4)]
  2. [(1/4) x 8 + (/4) x 2] + (-2)
  3. 2.5 - 2
  4. 0.5

Summary of Nine Portfolios:

Portfolio / Variance / Standard Deviation

  1. A / 0.5 / 0.707
  2. B / 12.5 / 3.536
  3. C / 4.6 / 2.145
  4. D / 2 / 1.414
  5. E / 7 / 2.646
  6. F / 3.6 / 1.897
  7. G / 2 / 1.414
  8. H / 6.7 / 2.588
  9. I / 2.7 / 1.643
33
Q

See Excel Questions

A

See Exel Questions

34
Q

What is the formula to compute a standard deviation of a two security portfolio?

A
  1. Standard Deviation of Portfolio =
  2. σ = (Weight of AssetA2 x Standard DevA2 + Weight of AssetB2 x Standard DevB2 + Weight of AssetC2 x Standard DevC2 + (2 x Weight of AssetA x Weight of AssetB x Standard DevA x Standard DevB x Correlation Coefficient of AB)^(1/2)
35
Q

If we have an average variance of a return for individual security of 50 and the average covariance is 10, what is the expected variance of an equally weighted portfolio of 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 securities?

A

The variance of an Equally Weighted Portfolio?

  1. σ2 = (1/N)(Average Variance Across all Securities - Average Covariance across all pairs of securities) + Average Covariance across all pairs of securities
  2. σ2 = (1/N)(50 - 10) + 10
  3. σ2 = 40/N + 10
  4. Number of Securities = 5
    1. σ2 = 40/5 + 10
    2. σ2 = 18
  5. Number of Securities = 10
    1. σ2 = 40/10 + 10
    2. σ2 = 14
  6. Number of Securities = 20
    1. σ2 = 40/20 + 10
    2. σ2 = 12
  7. Number of Securities = 50
    1. σ2 = 40/50 + 10
    2. σ2 = 10.8
  8. Number of Securities = 100
    1. σ2 = 40/100 + 10
    2. σ2 = 10.4
36
Q

The average covariance across all pairs of securities is given as 10. The average variance is given as 50.

In Problem 3, how many securities need to be helf before the risk of a portfolio is only 10% more than the minimum… and what is the minimum amount of risk?

A

FIRST!

  • You need to recognize that as N approaches infinity, the variance of the portoflio will converse to the covariance of 10. THIS IS THE MINIMUM RISK LEVEL

What is the number of 40 securities in the portfolio for the risk to be 10% higher than the minimum risk portfolio?

  • 11 = 40 / N + 10
  • 1 = 40 / N
  • N = 40
  • 40 Securities set the variance of a portfolio at 11%
37
Q

For Italy data and Belgium data of Table 4.9, what is the ratio of the difference between the average variance minus average covariance and the average covariance? If the average variance of a single security is 50, what is the expected variance of a portfolio of 5, 20, and 100 securities?

A