4/5 Cognitive Biases & Individual Differences Flashcards
Confirmation Trap
gathering additional facts or support to influence your choice of which facts to gather and where to look. Looking for information that will confirm our preferred answer or choice and to neglect to search for evidence that might prove us wrong
2 facts about fact gathering
we are over confident and confirmation trap
how to solve fact gathering
think of ways you could be wrong
4 ways of thinking about consequences
- reduce the number of consequences
- self vs. others
- consequences as risks
- Consequences over time: Escalation of Commitment
Illusion of Optimism
overestimating the likelihood of good future events and underestimating bad future events
Illusion of Control
the general belief that we are in charge of what happens, and we can control events. We also think bad things are less likely to happen
Illusion of Superiority
people tend to think of themselves as more ethical, fair, honest than most people
Implicit Association Test (IAT)
a new research tool that can help understand the potential (often negative) role of the unconscious in a certain type of ethical thinking.
Ethical Judgement
making a decision about what is the right think to do.
Individual Differences
- Ethical Decision-Making Style
- Locus of Control
- Cognitive Moral Development
- Machiavellians
- Moral Disengagement
Idealism
person’s concern for the welfare of others
Realism
the person’s emphasis on ethical principles dependent on the situation rather than being a applicable to all situations.
Kholberg’s Moral Reasoning Theory
a cognitive development theory that focuses primarily on how people think about/decide what course of action is ethically right.
Level 1: Pre-conventional
individuals are very self-centered and views ethical rules as imposed from outside the self.
Level 1 - Stage 1
Obedience and punishment orientation: obedience to authority for own sake, stick to rules to avoid punishment