3.6 - Government Intervention Flashcards
What is the CMA?
Competition and Markets Authority, they promote competition for the benefit of consumers and investigate legal breaches
What is ‘surrogate competition’?
if there is no competition, the CMA will create a sense of it
Controlling mergers
In the UK, mergers are investigated if they will lessen competition by becoming a monopoly (CR1>25%) - higher prices and less choice. However, the CMA suffers from regulatory capture and asymmetric information
Controlling monopolies
they might exploit consumers, be X-inefficient and offer high prices and less choice
Methods to control mergers/monopolies
- price regulation
- profit regulation
- quality standards
- performance targets
Methods to promote competition and contestability
- promotion of small businesses
- deregulation
- competitive tendering
protecting suppliers and employees
- restrictions on monopsony power
- privatisation and nationalisation
- workers rights
- natural monopoly
Privatisation
sale of governments assets to private investors
Advantages of privatisation
- encourages increased competition and efficiency
- lower prices, higher quality
- managers held more accountable
- In LR and SR it reduces public sector net cash requirement (PSNCR) and raises revenue
decreased government intervention - workers will be more hardworking - rewards
Privatisation disadvantages
- natural monopolies are better under government control
- key industries should be state-run
- externalities and inequality
- negatively affects public sector net cash requirement (PSNCR) - gov no longer gets firms profit
Nationalisation
Private sector company is bought under state control, owned and managed by government
Nationalisation advantages
- private sector only invests in SR, investment is needed in LR - state-run
- natural monopolies better to be under government control
- gov considers externalities
- minimum level of service to low income earners
- key strategic industries
Nationalisation disadvantages
- suffer from principal-agent problem and moral hazard
- X-inefficient
- will become a monopoly, bad for consumers
- influenced by government decisions, who might not have enough money to invest
- post WW2 - increased nationalisation
Government intervention impacts (AN)
- governments able to prevent monopolies and limit their profits. Ensure consumers pay fair prices, get quality services and more choice. High regulations could force firms out -> less choice
- they can increase efficiency by increasing competition and contestability. Regulating prices -> costs low -> prevent X-inefficiency. However, too much regulation will increase AC and inefficiency
- if a government runs a business, they should reduce prices and increase quality and benefit consumers. they should be allocatively efficient in the public sector and maximise social welfare. However, they might have no incentive to be efficient (no compensation)
- governments intervention tends to be limited because of political power of large firms and industries, who can lobby the government and set up pressure groups
Government intervention limits (EV)
- regulatory capture
- asymmetric information