3.6 Government Intervention Flashcards
examples of how firms privatise
- sale of state owned shared in companies
- contracting out of services previously provided by the state
- selling of individual state assets
- deregulation
what are the aims of privatisation
- improve efficiency - x-efficiency
- improve quality & range of services
- lower prices - competition
- widening of share ownership
- revenue raising
- global competition
how is privatisation successful
- rasing gov rev
- loss making firms start to make profit
- state owned firms are no longer such a burden
arguments for privatisation
- private companies have a profit incentive to cut costs and be more efficient and raise productivity
- government gains rev from sale of assets
- state monopoly is replaced by multiple firms leading to lower prices
- create shareholder democracy
- reduce the public sector net cash requirement
successfulness of privatisation in the energy sector (UK)
- real prices fell in the 1990s
- major price rise since 2008 - believed to be due to tacit collusion
- customer intertia = loss of welfare
successfulness of privatisation in the water sector
- bills risen significantly since 1989
- OFWAT reduced customer’s bills due to large efficiency improvements
- OFWAT prevented water providers from raising prices by 18% in 2004 due to supposed efficiency gains
successfulness of privatisation in the rail sector
- regulated rail fares rose in real terms since 1997
- standard of service worsened
- recently = improvements to track infrastructure as investment has begun to pay off
- lots of gov investment
arguments against privatisation
- social objectives hold less importance
- some activities are better run by the state as they are strategic parts of the economy
- gov loses out on dividends from future profits
- shares are often bought by large institutions
define nationalisation
the transfer of a major branch of industry or commerce from private to state ownership or control
arguments for state ownership
- target social objectives
- charge lower prices - not focused on profit max
- natural monopolies = economies of scale
- used to hit macroeconomic aims
arguments against state ownership
- absence of shareholder pressure = diseconomies of scale
- x-inefficiency
- lack an incentive to innovate
- losses of state-owned firms are absorbed by taxpayers = budget deficits
- suffer from the principal-agent problem and moral hazard
3 duties of regulators
- make the firm act as if they were in a competitive market
- once there is a competition the regulator has to consider price
- they will seek to reduce the barriers to entry and exit
what is price capping
regulators can set price controls to force monopolists to charge a price below profit maximising price
how do regulators determine the price cap
RPI - X + K
RPI = the retail price index (measure of inflatikon)
X = the efficiency gains that the regulator has determined can reasonably be achieved by the firm
K = the additional capital spending that a firm has agreed with the regulator is necessary
advantages of price capping
- firms are allowed to keep any profits they make if they improve efficiency to a greater level
- X or K factor is in place for 5 years, firms can plan ahead and know that they will not be penalised for making further efficiency gains