3.4.5 Monopoly Flashcards
Characteristics of a monopoly
o Profit maximisation (in both the short run and the long run)
o Sole seller in a market (a pure monopoly)
o High barriers to entry
o Price maker
o Price discrimination
Monopoly power in the UK
In the UK, when one firm dominates the market with more than 25% market share,
the firm has monopoly power.
- e.g, Google dominates the search engine
market, with 90% share.
Factors influencing monopoly power
- barriers to entry
- the number of competitors
- advertising
- the degree of product differentiation
Types of barriers to entry
- economies of scale
- limit pricing
- owning a resource
- sunk costs
- brand loyalty
- set up costs
Types of barriers to entry: economies of scale
As firms grow larger, the AC falls because of economies of scale. = existing
large firms have a cost advantage over new entrants to the market, which maintains their monopoly power.
- It deters new firms from entering the market, because they are not able to compete with
existing firms.
Types of barriers to entry: limit pricing
This involves the existing firm setting the price of their good below the production costs of new entrants, to make sure new firms cannot enter profitably
- designed to protect monopoly power and supernormal profit
Types of barriers to entry: owning a resource
- Early entrants to a market can establish their monopoly power by gaining control of a resource.
- e.g, BT owns the network of cables = difficult for new firm to enter the market.
Types of barriers to entry: sunk costs
- If unrecoverable costs, e.g advertising, are high in an industry = deter new firms from entering the market since because if they are unable to compete, they do not get the value of the costs back.
Types of barriers to entry (brand loyalty)
: If consumers are very loyal to a brand, which can be
increased with advertising, it is difficult for new firms to gain market
share.
Types of barriers to entry: set up costs
: If consumers are very loyal to a brand, which can be
increased with advertising, it is difficult for new firms to gain market
share.
Monopoly graph
Since the firm is the sole supplier in the market, the firm’s cost and revenue curve is
the same as the industry’s cost and revenue curve. Firms are price makers in a
monopoly.
P>MC in the diagram, due to profit maximisation which occurs at MC = MR, so there
is allocative inefficiency in a monopoly.
AR > AC, so there are supernormal profits
Price discrimination is an monopoly
Price discrimination occurs in a monopoly and is when the monopolist decides to charge different groups of consumers different prices for the same g/s to a degree.
- Examples of third degree price discrimination to rail passengers might be higher prices at peak times on trains or adults and students paying different prices.
Price discrimination is an monopoly
occurs in a monopoly, when the monopolist decides to charge
different groups of consumers different prices, for the same good or service. This is
not for cost reasons.
Elasticity and monopolies
The diagram shows the different price elasticities in a market, which might mean the
monopolist charges different prices. A market with an elastic demand curve (the
second graph) will have a lower price, while a market with an inelastic demand curve
will have a higher price (first graph). The third graph shows the firm’s costs and
revenues. The area of supernormal profit is represented by the yellow shaded
rectangle.
Third degree price discrimination
when different groups of consumers are charged a different price for the same good or service. For example, the higher price at peak times on trains is a form of third degree price discrimination, because generally, a different group of consumers (usuallycommuters) use trains at peak times, than off-peak times. Similarly, adults,students and children pay different prices to see the same film at a cinema. It costs the cinema the same to show the film, but the consumers have been
divided into groups based on age.
Costs of price discrimination on consumers
- a loss of consumer surplus.
-Since P > MC,= a loss of allocative efficiency = strengthens the monopoly power of firms = could result in higher prices in the long run for consumers
Costs of price discrimination to producers
If it is used as a predatory pricing method, the firm could face investigation by the Competition and
Markets Authority.
- It might cost the firm to divide the market, which limits the benefits the could gain.
What are the benefits of price discrimination to consumers?
- Consumers could benefit from a net welfare gain as a result of cross subsidisation, if they
receive a lower price. - Some consumers, who were previously excluded by high prices, might now be able to benefit from the g/s.
E.g, drug companies might charge consumers with higher incomes more for the same drugs, so that the less well-off can also access the drugs at a lower price. This can yield positive externalities
Benefits of price discrimination to producers
The higher supernormal profits, which result from price discrimination = help stimulate investment.
- If more profits are made in one market, a different market which makes losses could be cross
subsidised, especially if it yields social benefits.
-This will limit or prevent job losses, which might result from the closure of the loss-making market.
Disadvantages of monopolies
- higher prices
- decline in consumer surplus
- inefficient
- diseconomies of scale
- monopsony power
- gain political power
Disadvantages of monopolies (higher prices)
- Monopolies face inelastic demand and so can increase prices – giving consumers no alternative
- e.g in the 1980s, Microsoft had a monopoly on PC software and charged a high price for Microsoft Office.
Disadvantages of monopolies (decline in consumer surplus)
Consumers pay higher prices and fewer consumers can afford to buy. This also leads to allocative inefficiency because the price is greater than marginal cost.
Disadvantages of monopolies (inefficient//0
Monopolies have fewer incentives to be efficient. With no competition, a monopoly can make profit without much effort, therefore it can encourage x-inefficiency (organisational slack)
Disadvantages of monopolies (diseconomies of scale)
A big firm may become inefficient because it is harder to coordinate and communicate in a big firm.
Disadvantages of monopolies (monopsony power)
Monopolies often have monopsony power in paying a lower price to suppliers. For example, farmers have complained about the monopsony power of large supermarkets – which means they receive a very low price for products. A monopoly may also have the power to pay lower wages to its workers.
Disadvantages of monopolies (gain in political power)
Monopoly diagram
https://www.economicshelp.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/monopoly-diagram.png.webp
Inefficiency of monopoly
Monopolies set the price of Pm – which is higher than Pc (allocative inefficiency)
Monopolies produce at Qm (which is productive inefficient – not the lowest point on AC curve)
Monopolies lead to deadweight welfare loss of blue triangle
Advantages of monopolies
- economies of scale
- innovation
Advantages of monopolies (economies of scale)
- In an industry with high fixed costs, a single firm can gain lower long-run average costs – through exploiting economies of scale.
- This is particularly important for firms operating in a natural monopoly (e.g. rail infrastructure, gas network).
Economies of scale graph
https://www.economicshelp.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/economies-of-scale-growth-in-firm.png
Disadvantages of monopolies (innovation)
Without patents and monopoly power, drug companies would be unwilling to invest so much in drug research. The monopoly power of patent provides an incentive for firms to develop new technology and knowledge, that can benefit society. Also, monopolies make supernormal profit and this supernormal profit can be used to fund investment which leads to improved technology and dynamic efficiency.
E.g, large tech monopolies, such as Google and Apple have invested significantly in new technological developments.
Disadvantages of monopolies (innovation) evaluation
this can also have downsides with drug companies able to charge excessively high prices for life-saving drugs. It also gives drug companies an incentive to push pharmaceutical treatments rather than much cheaper solutions to promoting good health and avoiding the poor health in the first place.