3.4.5 - Economies and Diseconomies of Scale Flashcards
What are economies of scale?
As an output increases, long-run average cost falls.
What are diseconomies of scale?
As an output increases, long-run average cost rises.
How can a firm benefit from economies of scale?
By increasing in size (up to a certain point).
Draw an LRAC (long-run average cost) curve.
Why is the short-run ATC curve U-shaped?
It is assumed under labour becomes more productive when added to fixed capital to a certain point, eventually becoming less productive due to the law of diminishing returns.
Why is the long-run AC curve U-shaped?
Economies and diseconomies of scale.
What point on an LRAC curve to all firms aspire to?
The turning point.
What types of scales are shown on the left side of a LRAC curve?
Economies of scale.
What types of scales are shown on the right side of an LRAC curve?
Diseconomies of scale.
Explain this graph.
There are a number of SRATC curves lying along the LRAC curve. Each of the SRATC curves demonstrates a different firm size. Firms can move from SRATC1 to SRATC2 in the long run. The LRAC curve forms a tangent with all of the SRATC curves.
What are internal economies and diseconomies of scale?
Changes in long-run average costs of production resulting from changes in the size or scale of a firm or plant.
What is an external economy of scale?
A fall in long-run average costs of production as a result of growth of the market / industry of which the firm is a part.
What is an external diseconomy of scale?
A rise in long-run average costs of production as a result of growth of the market / industry of which the firm is a part.
What is the difference between internal and external diseconomies of scale?
Internal scales only take into account the changes within each individual firm.
External scales take into account the changes within the market on the whole.
What are the types of internal economy of scales?
Technical
Managerial
Marketing
Financial / Capital-Raising
Risk-Bearing
Economies of Scope
What is a technical economy of scale?
Changes to the ‘productive process’ as the scale of production and level of output increase.
What is the ‘productive process’?
The method of employing each of the factors of production to provide goods and services to consumers.
What can techincal economies of scale be caused by?
Indivisibilities
Spreading of research / development costs
Volume Economies
Economies of massed resources
Economies of vertically linked processes
What is indivisibility?
There is a certain size below which capital / land cannot be used efficiently.
i.e. if you have a building that is 5m2, you cannot reasonably make any cars at that size, but if you have a building size of 50m2, you could make a few cars with the added space.
How does spreading research and development costs lead to technical economies of scale?
Within large plants, R&D costs can be spread over a longer production run, reducing long-run unit costs. The output is increased, as a firm can produce more units of a product, and the average costs are reduced as R&D leads to improved efficiency in the long-run.
What is a production run?
The most cost-efficient quantity of units to produce at a time.
How do volume economies lead to technical economies of scale?
Increasing the employment of capital goods leads to an increase in costs, but for many capital goods, the increase in costs is less rapid than the increase in capacity. For this reason, larger plants can employ more capital goods and therefore, their output increases, but their overall costs do not increase as rapidly, increasing their overall profit.
How do economies of massed resources lead to technical economies of scale?
Operating with identical capital goods means fewer spare parts must be kept than if there were many different capital goods.
Less spare parts means that there is increased productivity as each worker can become specialised to the specific capital good, increasing quantity faster than AC.
How do economies of vertically linked resources lead to technical economies of scale?
Many products involve a large number of related tasks and processes.
The initial purchase of raw materials, to the production of those materials etc.
If these tasks can become linked within a single plant, there can be a saving in time, transport costs and energy.
How do technical economies of scale lead to reduced overall average costs?
Employing more people, allows those people to specialise, increasing productivity. While the total cost increases, the supply increases faster than the total cost, so the average costs fall.
If more capital goods are employed, their initial cost will be quite high, but in the long-run, the productivity gained from more capital goods causes supply to rise faster than costs, causing average costs to fall.
The land they have employed can be used more efficiently as a firm gets larger, so the plant becomes more efficient, leading to a greater supply rise than costs, therefore average costs fall.
AC = TC / Q
How do managerial economies of scale lead to reduced average costs?
As a firm increases in scale, the firm is, therefore, able to benefit from specialisation and division of labour, namely, the employment of specialist managers. These managers will be able to monitor the productivity of their particular labour force, boosting productivity if needs be. The managers will also be able to apply their specialist abilities to boost their personal productivity.
Despite the hefty price to employ these specialist managers, the productivity will increase massively, so the quantity supplied will increase faster than total costs, causing average costs to fall.
How do marketing economies of scale lead to reduced average costs?
A larger firm can buy marketing products in bulk, reducing the average cost, as they can negotiate better unit prices due to bulk-buying, and are therefore able to spread their marketing costs over a larger range of outputs, meaning the total costs rise slower than the quantity, bringing down average costs.
How do financial or capital-raising economies of scale lead to reduced average costs?
As a firm increases in scale, they can negotiate better interest rates from the bank as the firm is more reputable and profitable than smaller firms, so banks are less cautious about lending money to the larger firms, as it is (almost) a given that they will return all the money due to their status as a lower risk firm.
Despite total costs rising, these costs will be able to be spread across a wider range of outputs, leading to average costs falling.
How do risk-bearing economies of scale lead to reduced average costs?
As a firm gets larger, they can diversify their outputs, sources of supply, sources of finance etc., therefore spreading their risks over a larger range of outputs.
These economies of diversification can make the firm less vulnerable to sudden changes in demand that would severely harm a smaller firm.
Diversification increases total costs, but as the quantity supplied increases faster than the total costs, average costs fall.
How do economies of scope lead to reduced average costs?
Diversifying a firm makes it cheaper to produce a range of products than to produce each one of the products on its own. This causes total costs to rise as more specialist goods are required, but overall quantity supplied increases faster, leading to a decrease in average costs.
What are the causes for internal diseconomies of scale?
Control Failure
Communication Failure
Coordination Failure
Motivational Failure
How do control failures lead to diseconomies of scale?
As a business increases in size past a certain point, it becomes increasingly difficult for managers to control the workforce. This can lead to a delegation of managerial functions to people with a lack of appropriate experience.
Along with this, an increase in the workforce to manager ratio can lead to workers becoming less productive as they know that managers are less likely to look at their work with a fine-tooth comb.
Their mistakes lead to an increase in total costs, which rise faster than supply, so average costs increase.
How do communication failures lead to diseconomies of scale?
Within a large organisation, there may be too many layers of management between the top managers and ordinary production workers, so staff can begin to feel unappreciated.
The time that it takes to spread messages throughout the firm is completely wasted, so this also causes a reduction in productivity.
This leads to reducing productivity as the unit costs begin to rise faster than supply does.
What does this graph depict, contrasting to the symmetrical U-shape LRAC graph?
There is a horizontal line between Q1 and Q2 that demonstrates that the exhaustion of the benefits of economy to scale does not immediately lead to diseconomies of scale.
What does this graph depict, contrasting to the symmetrical U-shape LRAC graph?
No firms benefit or suffer from economies / diseconomies of scale.
What does this graph depict, contrasting to the symmetrical U-shape LRAC graph?
Demonstrates the economies of small-scale production.
Diseconomies of scale set in much sooner comparatively to the symmetrical U-shape LRAC curve.
What does this graph depict, contrasting to the symmetrical U-shape LRAC graph?
Large-scale production, with diseconomies of scale setting in only when substantial economies of scale have been achieved comparatively to the U-shape LRAC curve.
What is the Δ% input that is covered in red?
100%
What is the output that is covered in red?
12000.
What is the labour that is covered in red?
510 TL (row 3)
80 + x TL (row 4)
80 + x = 4/3(510)
x = 600
What are the returns to scale for each row?
Increasing
Increasing
Constant
Decreasing
