3.4.1. Biostats Cohort Studies Flashcards
What study design is best for identifying people, measuring risk factors, then following forward to see if they develop disease?
Cohort study
What particular study was to identify common factors or characteristics that contribute to CVD by following its development over a long period of time in a large group of participants who had not yet developed overt CVD symptoms or suffered a heart attack or stroke.
Framingham study
The Framingham study measures what?
incidence of the CVD
Factors that the Framingham study believed to contribute to CVD (exposures) are?
elevated cholesterol, smoking, habitual alcohol use, lower physical activity, increased thyroid function, high blood hemoglobin or hematocrit, high body weight, diabetes mellitis, gout, age (higher), sex (male), hypertension
exposure -> outcome over time is what type of study
prospective cohort
exposure and outcome have both occurred. What type of study can you do?
Historical or retrospective cohort. You can do this when incidence for a disease is low over a given time. For example, development of virus (outcome), take a serum, then look back at records to see if they were obese (exposure).
State advantages/disadvantages for historical cohort.
- Cheaper and faster
- efficient with disease of long latency
- Data may be inadequate
Advantages/disadvantages to prospective cohort.
- More expensive and time consuming.
- Not efficient for diseases with long latent period
- Better exposure and confounder data
- Less vulnerable to bias.
- Rare exposures are good with what study? 2. Rare diseases are good with what study?
- Historical cohort - used to identify special risk factors/exposures
- case control
Rare exposures are utilized with special cohorts. What groups are best utilized in these types of studies?
- occupational groups. i.e. identifying a occupational hazard
- groups with unusual dietary or lifestyle factors
- groups undergoing particular medical treatments
When are general cohorts best used?
With common exposures in groups such as occupation (nurse health study), geographic location (Framingham heart study) -> selected for ease of data collection.
Restrictions in selecting unexposed for cohort
must be free of disease of interest at the time and must have had the opportunity for both exposure and disease
Discuss morbidity ratio
Used in the early days of the Framingham heart study (1950’s) as a means to determine relative risk essentially. = observed case/ expected case x 100
Define relative risk
= incidence in exposed/ incidence in unexposed. CI must not include 1.
Define risk difference
= incidence in exposed- incidence in unexposed. CI must not include 0