3.4.1. Biostats Cohort Studies Flashcards

1
Q

What study design is best for identifying people, measuring risk factors, then following forward to see if they develop disease?

A

Cohort study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What particular study was to identify common factors or characteristics that contribute to CVD by following its development over a long period of time in a large group of participants who had not yet developed overt CVD symptoms or suffered a heart attack or stroke.

A

Framingham study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The Framingham study measures what?

A

incidence of the CVD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Factors that the Framingham study believed to contribute to CVD (exposures) are?

A

elevated cholesterol, smoking, habitual alcohol use, lower physical activity, increased thyroid function, high blood hemoglobin or hematocrit, high body weight, diabetes mellitis, gout, age (higher), sex (male), hypertension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

exposure -> outcome over time is what type of study

A

prospective cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

exposure and outcome have both occurred. What type of study can you do?

A

Historical or retrospective cohort. You can do this when incidence for a disease is low over a given time. For example, development of virus (outcome), take a serum, then look back at records to see if they were obese (exposure).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

State advantages/disadvantages for historical cohort.

A
  1. Cheaper and faster
  2. efficient with disease of long latency
  3. Data may be inadequate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Advantages/disadvantages to prospective cohort.

A
  1. More expensive and time consuming.
  2. Not efficient for diseases with long latent period
  3. Better exposure and confounder data
  4. Less vulnerable to bias.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. Rare exposures are good with what study? 2. Rare diseases are good with what study?
A
  1. Historical cohort - used to identify special risk factors/exposures
  2. case control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Rare exposures are utilized with special cohorts. What groups are best utilized in these types of studies?

A
  1. occupational groups. i.e. identifying a occupational hazard
  2. groups with unusual dietary or lifestyle factors
  3. groups undergoing particular medical treatments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When are general cohorts best used?

A

With common exposures in groups such as occupation (nurse health study), geographic location (Framingham heart study) -> selected for ease of data collection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Restrictions in selecting unexposed for cohort

A

must be free of disease of interest at the time and must have had the opportunity for both exposure and disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Discuss morbidity ratio

A

Used in the early days of the Framingham heart study (1950’s) as a means to determine relative risk essentially. = observed case/ expected case x 100

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define relative risk

A

= incidence in exposed/ incidence in unexposed. CI must not include 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define risk difference

A

= incidence in exposed- incidence in unexposed. CI must not include 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a risk factor?

A

It means there is a statistical association. It does not imply causal association. It only means there is a risk. It does not mean high blood pressure causes HBP, for example.

17
Q

Temporality

A

Cause must proceed the effect. If there is an expected delay between cause and effect, that delay must occur before the effect.

18
Q

consistency

A

association observed in different populations and circumstances

19
Q

strength of association

A

large relative risk or ARR

20
Q

dose response

A

more exposure leads to higher rate of disease

21
Q

plausibility

A

consistent with biological models

22
Q

reversibility

A

if exposure is reduced, disease rate falls

23
Q

specificity

A

one cause leads to one effect

24
Q

analogy

A

cause-effect relationship established for similar exposure or disease

25
Q

What test can measure temporality

A

Cohort and randomized controlled trials