3.4 Flashcards
pros of short termism
Quick Results: Short-term decisions can lead to immediate results, which can be beneficial for addressing urgent issues or taking advantage of immediate opportunities.
Flexibility: Focusing on the short term allows businesses to be more agile and adapt quickly to changes in the market or environment.
cons of short termism
Sustainability Issues: Short-term decisions might prioritize quick gains over sustainable growth, leading to potential problems down the line.
Employee Morale: Constant pressure to meet short-term targets can lead to employee burnout, decreased morale, and higher turnover rates.
pros of long termism
Strategic Planning: Long-termism encourages thorough planning and development of comprehensive strategies that can lead to significant competitive advantages.
Innovation Encouragement: Investing in research and development is often part of long-term planning, fostering innovation and keeping the business ahead in its industry.
cons of long termism
Delayed Results: Long-term decisions may take a considerable amount of time to show benefits, which can be challenging in fast-paced markets requiring quick responses.
Higher Initial Costs: Investing in long-term projects, such as new technologies or infrastructure, often requires significant upfront costs without immediate returns.
pros of evidence based decision making
Accuracy: Decisions are based on reliable data and facts, leading to more accurate and effective outcomes.
Objectivity: Reduces personal biases and emotions, making the decision process more objective and fair.
Improved Performance: Using evidence can lead to better performance and efficiency, as decisions are grounded in proven information.
cons of evidence based decision making
Time-Consuming: Gathering and analyzing evidence can take a lot of time and resources, which might delay the decision-making process.
pros of subjective based decision making
Flexibility: Allows for more flexibility and adaptability in unique or rapidly changing situations where data may not be available.
Personal Insight: Leveraging personal experience and intuition can be valuable, especially in fields where data is scarce or not applicable.
cons of subjective based decision making
Bias: Subjective decisions are prone to personal biases, emotions, and prejudices, which can lead to unfair or suboptimal outcomes.
Over-Reliance on Experience: Heavy reliance on personal experience might ignore new information or innovative approaches that could be beneficial.
what is power culture?
In a power culture decision-making is carried out by one or a small number of powerful individuals usually at the top of the business hierarchy
Few rules exist to determine decision-making procedure
A competitive atmosphere between workers vying for power
pros of power culture
Quick Decision-Making: Power cultures are typically centralized, with decisions made quickly by a few key individuals. This can lead to swift responses to opportunities and threats, giving the business a competitive edge.
Clear Leadership: There is a strong, clear direction from the top, which can provide a unified vision and purpose for the organization. Employees know who is in charge and what is expected of them, which can reduce confusion and streamline operations.
cons of power culture
Limited Employee Autonomy: With power concentrated at the top, employees may have little input or autonomy in their roles. This can lead to decreased motivation, creativity, and job satisfaction, as employees might feel undervalued and disengaged.
Risk of Overdependence: The success of the organization can become overly dependent on the capabilities and decisions of a few individuals. If these key leaders make poor decisions or leave the company, it can lead to significant disruptions and challenges for the business.
what is role culture
In a role culture key decisions are made by those with specific job roles
Power lies with those with particular job titles rather than those with desirable skills
There is usually a very clear hierarchical structure
Employees are expected to adhere to rules and understand their place in the hierarchy
pros of role culture
Clear Structure: Role culture provides a clear organizational structure with defined roles and responsibilities. This clarity helps employees understand their duties and how their work contributes to the overall goals of the organization.
Consistency and Efficiency: With standardized procedures and clear guidelines, role culture ensures consistency in operations. This can lead to increased efficiency as employees follow established processes to complete tasks.
cons of role culture
Inflexibility: Role culture can be rigid, making it difficult to adapt to changes or respond quickly to new opportunities and challenges. This inflexibility can hinder innovation and responsiveness in a dynamic business environment.
Lack of Motivation: The focus on defined roles and adherence to procedures can lead to a lack of autonomy for employees. This can result in decreased motivation and job satisfaction, as employees may feel restricted and undervalued in their positions.
what is task culture?
In a task culture decisions are made by teams made up of employees with specific skills
Power lies with those with task-related skills (e.g. a finance specialist may make decisions related to funding within the group)