3.1- The Constitution Flashcards
How has the constitution in the UK developed
It has not, as many countries have, undergone radical and sudden change. IT has instead evolved gradually and since the 17th century, without dramatic breaks.
Elements of its power can be traced back more than a thousand years ago, where the crown ruled, but required the landowning nobility to commit to their views.
From the 13th century parliament developed with Nobels and other interests groups that met to advise the monarch, pass laws and give consent for taxation. IT had an upper house and elected commons. The commons increasing demand to be heard and representative aspect led to its increased power. the power began to shift towards the commons due to civil wars. By the 19th century Britain was governed on the basis of a constitutional monarch who acted on ministers advice. THEY WERE ACCOUNTABLE AS THE SUPREME LAW making body. Voting rights were extended and the commons grew more powerful.
Along with this the judiciary was understood to have a need to be independent o apolitical ideas and judges became important in their upholding of the law.
Outline the 6 main acts of parliament, that developed the Uk constitution.
- The Magna Carta- 1215
An arrangement between king John and Barrons who had rebelled due to abuses of power. Mainly nobility based- much repealed. Mainly symbolic. It stated the idea that no one should be deprived liberty or property without due process of law.
The Bill of rights- 1689-
- Passed by parliament due to the rule of James II who was driven away in the glorious revolution.. William III affirmed the rights of parliament when they accepted the throne. It included provisions for regular parliaments, free elections and freedom of speech within parliament
Act of settlement 1701-
- Motivated by a desire to exclude James II and heirs from throne. Their catholic religion was assorted with tyranny- it determined the right of parliament to determine the line of succession.
Acts of Union 1707-
United Scotland and England, who had a shared monarch since 1603, but had two separate parliaments. Combine under Westminster- basis for Uk government, until Blair
Parliament acts of 1911 and 1949-
- Reduced power of lords to interfere with commons. Provoked by lords rejecting peoples budget. 1911 affirmed that the Lords could not delay money bills. For non money bills it was limited to two years. This was then reduced in 1949.to a year
European communities act 1972
Passed by Heaths government, took Britain into the EEC. EU law is supreme- may be repealed.
What is the nature of the UK constitution
It is un-codified- there is no single legal code or document in which its key ideas are gathered together, Rather it draws from a variety of sources.
It is un-entrenched, so it can be changed with relative ease. There is no special legal procedure and all laws have the same status on a legal level. For example the US amendments need a two thirds majority and three quarter state support to become law
It is unitary- ITs authority its located at the centre and run in a similar way. It has been modified through devolution.
What three ways can parliament be said to be sovereign
- Legislation passed by parliament cannot be struck down by a higher body. the supreme court can interpret, but not overturn
- No parliament can bind its successor . Any law can be repealed or amended. For example in 2003 the labour government overturned section 28 of the local government act.
Parliament can make law on any subject. For example in the 1960s legalising abortion, homosexuality and abolishing the death penalty.
What is the rule of law
The main way in which liberties of citizens are protected. Respect for the rule of law is important as it acts as a check on sovereignty. Under the rule of law:
- Everyone is entitled to a fair train and no one should be imprisoned without fair trial.
- All citizens should obey the law and are equal under it
- Public officials are not above the law
- The judiciary must be independent, as a body.
What are the 5 sources of the UK constitution and examples of them
Statute law
- Body of Law passed by parliament. Not all are constitutional, just those that affect the nature of the political system and citizens rights.IT is underpinned with the idea of parliamentary sovereignty- the 1998 Scotland act, government of Wales act and northern Ireland act devolved the body. For example of the 1707 united Scotland. Representation of the peoples acts- 1968.
Common law
- Legal principals laid down by judges in their rulings in court cases, which provide precedents for later judgements. Important in cases where it’s not clear how law should be applied. this is seen in the idea of innocent till proven guilty- Habeas corpus- is a common law protection against unlawful imprisonment that was made a statute in 1679.Girl who was cryogenically frozen. When statute doesn’t apply. A president that is binding on lower courts. A man and woman had been divorced many years ago, she had helped build the business. HE was told to pay the upkeep of a child, but she did not know the full amount he was eating, and she demanded that the payment should be increased- he argued there was no obligation. HE had to pay back to the women- a president has been set.
Conventions-
Customs and practices that do not have legal force, but are generally accepted. Can be challenged or change- mostly aren’t. The principal established in 2003 with draw was that except in emergency, the government will not order military action without prior parliamentary approval. Understanding- if looses vote of confidence, it must hold an election. The prime minister’s roll is entirely conventional. Royal assent
Authoritative works-
Explanations of the workings of a political system, back legal guidance.Erskine May’s Parliamentary practice in 1844 and updated since explains the rules of parliamentary acts. This was seen when Bercow called upon the text saying an act “may not be brought forward again during the same session” and that it was a “strong and longstanding convention” dating back to 1604.
Treaties- including European Union law
Agreements with other Eu members which the UK governments have signed. Treaty of Maastricht transformed the European community into a union.
What was the pressure from the labour opposition for constitutional reform and how did it develop, in the 1990s
Blair wanted to use reform to modernise British institutions. Old labour had started this in extended the vote to 18 year olds in 1969 and attempting to devolve Scotland and Wales in 1979. It was not its main focus. New labour was more open to the pressure of pressure groups- Such as Chapter 88 (later unlock democracy) who wanted more open democracy and guarantees of citizens rights. He thought he may need support from the Lib Dems.
Conservative governments had refused to allow for these reforms and ergo pressure started to build up- especially in Scotland. Poll tax allowed for this as well as sleaze.
What 5 key areas did Labour reform (1997-200)
- House of Lords
- Electoral
- Devolution
- Human rights act
- Creation of a Supreme Court
How did new labour reform the house of Lords
When labour took office the Lords were mainly hereditary.
The government ended the right fo all but 92 to hold these seats - most supported conservatives and it modernised the appearance. Most were now appointed life peers, appointed on the grounds of merit and expertise in many different fields. No party now had a majority A House of lords appointments commission nominated a proportion of peers who were not from any party, however party leaders still made nominations. It still lacks democratic legitimacy.
What did New labour reform in the electoral sector
Various forms of PR are introduced, for example in the Scottish Parliament, Welsh assembles, Northern Ireland parliament and European parliament.
A report was don eon FPTP in Westminster, chaired by Roy Jenkins, no action was taken. Labour had no interest, as it benefited them.
What did New labour reform in terms of devolution
Devolved bodies were created for Scotland, Wales and NI following referendums. They helped limit nationalist support and create peace and harmony. The welsh assembly had less support.
They had no answer on the West Lothian question- Scottish MPs can vote on English matters, but not vice versa. The Barnett formula also caused issues it determines relative levels of public spending, Scotland, Wales and NI were gaining more per head than the other areas- 97% of average in England compared to 121% and 116% in NI and Scotland respectively.
An North east assembly was but to public vote in 2004, but was decimated 78% to 22%
How did the human rights act add to reforms
The act, that was incorporated the European court of human rights principals into state law. It protected citizens rights and all future legislation has to be compatible with the ECHR. Judges could not strike down laws, but could highlight it for amendment.
Its limitations were seen in the governments conflict with article 5, that gave people the rights to security and liberty, in cases of suspected terrorism. The introduction of control orders, which allow the authorities to limit freedom of movement of such people, highlighted the unentrenched nature of the act.
How did the creation of the Supreme Court add to Labours reforms
The 2005 constitutional reform act led to the establishment of the supreme court, as the highest court of appeal- for Civil cases and (apart from in Scotland) criminal cases. Before it was the Law lords who has done this. IT was an example of separations of power. IT was a physical and subsequently metaphorical separation of power.
Where did the 2010-15 coalition disagree in terms of house of lords and common boundary reforms.
Plans for a mainly democratic house of Lords was dropped after a rebellion of 91 tory MPs. The Lib Dems responded by refusing to vote for a. reduction of MPs to 600 from 650- it would have mainly benefited the conservatives. They later tried to put it through and failed
Where did the 2010-15 coalition disagree in terms of electoral reform
A referendum was help in 2011, where the tories favoured FPTP and Lib Dems AV- a preferential, but not proportional voting system. 68% rejected it.
This was a major disappointment for the Lib Dems, they wanted STV, but compromised to it.