3 midterm (anthropological and sociological approaches 2) Flashcards
Marx’s bias is that what
theology and philosophy are a product of “inverted consciousness”
what is “inverted consciousness”
that is, reality for them is constituted by ideas, not as it actually is: by material and social forces
what is Feuerbach’s stance on Alienation
religion confuses the idea of God with Human reality (= alienation).
what is Feuerbach’s stance on reconciliation
True knowledge consists in placing Humanity in the place of God (= reconciliation)
what is marx’s stance on Alienation
religion legitimates a class struggle between the ruling class (bourgeois) and the working class (proletariat) by being resigned to an otherworldly state of affairs (= alienation)
what is marx’s stance on reconciliation
True knowledge consists in a changed state of affairs, overthrowing the capitalist economic system that uses religion to reinforce the capitalist status quo (= reconciliation):
marx’s stance as compared to feuerbch’s stance marks the shift from classical theology and philosophy to what
classical anthropology and sociology, from philosophy and theology as the means by which religion is to be explained. It also marks the culminating movement of the process from transcendence to immanence
This background explains why early sociology and anthropology felt that a scientific explanation of religion should focus on what
the human, not the divine—in some cases: the human as “divine”
• the importance of material (“empirical”) explanations of religion, not speculation (i.e. philosophy and theology)
This background also explains why early sociology and anthropology adopted a pejorative attitude toward religion… what is another phrase/label for this
“the criticism of religion”
what is the bridge from transcendence to immanence
Hegal
Freuerbach
Marx
give an overview of hegal
Hegal tries to show that we can not get the full perspective, when we dive up the universe we are alienated from who we are.
give an overview of marx
eliminate the class struggle (tale away the religion and the bourgeoisie has nothing over proletariates
what ar the different approaches
evolutionist
functionalist
interpretive
structuralist
who is included in evolutionist
Durkheim, Tylor, Müller, Frazer
who is included in Functionalist
Durkheim, Malinowski, Radcliffe-Brown, Evans-Pritchard
who is included in Interpretive
Geertz
who is included in Structuralist
Lévi-Strauss, Turner
early anthropology inherited the critical spirit of who
Feuerbach and Marx
early anthropology inherited the critical spirit of Feuerbach and Marx toward religion wedding it to the view that religion, especially primal forms, were what
“somehow retarded on the path of cultural progress (and even mental development)”
early thinkers were what
evolutionists
Early theorists were thus enamored by a quest for what
for the origins of religion
what was the basic assumption of the anthropologists
By di•scLéovi-eSrtirnaugssr,eTluigrnioenr inprimalform,wecould track developments in terms of stages of ascendancy, supremacy.